Scaling the Electrochemical Conversion of CO2 to CO
Source abstract
Abstract
The key challenges for the industrial electrolysis of CO 2 into CO are the low CO 2 conversion, restricted scale-up, and poor long-term operation. Systematic process design and electrolyzer engineering are essential for addressing these challenges and exploiting the full potential of commercial CO 2 electrolysis. In this study, we employed a bipolar membrane (BPM) in a pressurized electrolyzer with a 25 cm 2 active area to achieve a maximum FE CO of 93% with a cell voltage of 3.5 V and a maximum CO 2 single-pass conversion of 70% without detecting CO 2 crossover. In addition, we upscaled the system active area from 5 to 250 cm 2 and showed that this increase did not result in a loss of performance. In particular, the performance on the pressurized 100 cm 2 electrolyzer established an average FE CO of 85% with a CO 2 single-pass conversion of 60% for over 120 h. This provides practical approaches for transitioning from laboratory-scale to industrial-scale electrolysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Ionic liquids properties and applications · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shell Global Solutions International B.V., Grasweg 31, 1031HW Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Funding
Shell Global Solutions International
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D3EY00159H10.1039/D3EY00159H ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.11052110.1016/j.rser.2020.110521 ↗
3. Energy Technology Perspectives 2017; IEA: 2017; https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2017. Licence: CC BY 4.0, pp 1–441.
4. 10.1039/c3ee41272e10.1039/c3ee41272e ↗
5. 10.1039/D0TA03525D10.1039/D0TA03525D ↗
6. 10.1002/adsu.20200009610.1002/adsu.202000096 ↗
7. 10.1039/C8EE01684D10.1039/C8EE01684D ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.01110.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.011 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.0501815jes10.1149/2.0501815jes ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ccst.2023.10013310.1016/j.ccst.2023.100133 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41565-020-00823-x10.1038/s41565-020-00823-x ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0062010.1021/acsenergylett.3c00620 ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms424210.1038/ncomms4242 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0061410.1021/acs.accounts.1c00614 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0205810.1021/acsenergylett.1c02058 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-022-31295-310.1038/s41467-022-31295-3 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0047510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00475 ↗
18. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac580e10.1149/1945-7111/ac580e ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20230161410.1002/aenm.202301614 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.15910.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.159 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0048910.1021/acsenergylett.3c00489 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.01410.1016/j.joule.2019.11.014 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.10233810.1016/j.jcou.2022.102338 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.447810.1103/PhysRevB.49.4478 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp072646k10.1021/jp072646k ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cplett.2003.11.05410.1016/j.cplett.2003.11.054 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00706-018-2156-410.1007/s00706-018-2156-4 ↗
28. Naumkin A · Sci. J. Biomed Eng. Biomed Sci. · 2018 · 2 · 14
29. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0035210.1021/acs.iecr.2c00352 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0494410.1021/acs.iecr.8b04944 ↗
31. 10.1149/1.205506710.1149/1.2055067 ↗
32. 10.1016/0022-0728(95)03935-A10.1016/0022-0728(95)03935-A ↗
33. 10.1021/ef101212e10.1021/ef101212e ↗
34. 10.1039/c2ee03393c10.1039/c2ee03393c ↗
35. 10.1002/celc.20220023910.1002/celc.202200239 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.10187810.1016/j.jcou.2021.101878 ↗