Intimate Protective Layer via Lithiation Sintering for All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
In the pursuit of safer and more energy-dense battery systems, all-solid-state lithium metal batteries (ASSLMBs) have emerged as an attractive alternative with significant potential to conventional lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, numerous protective layers proposed to passivate the Li metal anodes suffer from low ionic conductivity and high local current density due to interfacial contact loss. Here, we address these challenges by developing an intimate protective layer with high ionic conductivity, synthesized through a pressure-induced lithiation sintering process. During lithiation, nanosized Si (nSi) particles expand and sinter together into a compact layer with intimate contact. This process yields a pore-free nSi-Li layer that integrates seamlessly with the electrolyte layer. The unique morphology of this layer results in reduced overpotential and local current density, enabling stable and reversible 2-dimensional lithium plating and stripping. These findings highlight the importance of morphological effects in protective layers, thus marking a significant step forward in solid-state battery technology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Batteries Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute, 25 Saenari-ro, Seongnam 13509, Republic of Korea
Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
School of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1310.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0021110.1021/acsenergylett.0c00211 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0026210.1021/acsenergylett.4c00262 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm901452z10.1021/cm901452z ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.038 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41560-023-01208-910.1038/s41560-023-01208-9 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0112810.1021/acsenergylett.3c01128 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20170274410.1002/aenm.201702744 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20220104410.1002/aenm.202201044 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41563-023-01792-x10.1038/s41563-023-01792-x ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20220124910.1002/anie.202201249 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10892210.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108922 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-023-01426-110.1038/s41560-023-01426-1 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-020-0604-y10.1038/s41560-020-0604-y ↗
15. 10.1039/C9EE04007B10.1039/C9EE04007B ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20200254510.1002/aenm.202002545 ↗
18. 10.1126/sciadv.aau924510.1126/sciadv.aau9245 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20200274110.1002/adma.202002741 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41586-023-06653-w10.1038/s41586-023-06653-w ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0133410.1021/acsenergylett.2c01334 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.2c2130210.1021/acsami.2c21302 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20220206910.1002/smll.202202069 ↗
24. 10.1002/admi.20200169810.1002/admi.202001698 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20230776810.1002/adma.202307768 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10915010.1016/j.nanoen.2023.109150 ↗
27. 10.1002/cey2.46210.1002/cey2.462 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.01310.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.013 ↗
29. 10.1039/D1EE00754H10.1039/D1EE00754H ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467-021-27311-710.1038/s41467-021-27311-7 ↗
31. 10.1002/batt.20180014910.1002/batt.201800149 ↗
32. 10.5796/electrochemistry.80.73410.5796/electrochemistry.80.734 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0227410.1021/acsenergylett.3c02274 ↗
34. 10.1126/sciadv.abq015310.1126/sciadv.abq0153 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.2c0901310.1021/acsami.2c09013 ↗
36. 10.1002/advs.20227000110.1002/advs.202270001 ↗
37. 10.1002/aenm.20190212510.1002/aenm.201902125 ↗
38. 10.1126/sciadv.abn437210.1126/sciadv.abn4372 ↗
39. 10.1002/aenm.20230376210.1002/aenm.202303762 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41560-023-01231-w10.1038/s41560-023-01231-w ↗
41. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.01610.1016/j.joule.2022.05.016 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0091510.1021/acsenergylett.4c00915 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0179310.1021/acsenergylett.2c01793 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.495468310.1063/1.4954683 ↗
45. 10.1038/nnano.2007.41110.1038/nnano.2007.411 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41560-023-01279-810.1038/s41560-023-01279-8 ↗
47. 10.1126/science.abg721710.1126/science.abg7217 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41563-023-01722-x10.1038/s41563-023-01722-x ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20170570210.1002/adma.201705702 ↗
50. 10.1007/s41918-020-00092-110.1007/s41918-020-00092-1 ↗
51. 10.1126/science.abg599810.1126/science.abg5998 ↗
52. 10.1038/ncomms608810.1038/ncomms6088 ↗
53. 10.1002/eem2.1250110.1002/eem2.12501 ↗
54. 10.1021/cm203419510.1021/cm2034195 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0142710.1021/acsaem.3c01427 ↗
56. Forman, J. C.; Moura, S. J.; Stein, J. L.; Fathy, H. K. Genetic parameter identification of the Doyle-Fuller-Newman model from experimental cycling of a LiFePO4 battery. Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference 29 June–1 July 2011; pp 362369. 10.1109/ACC.2011.599118310.1109/ACC.2011.5991183 ↗
57. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗