STRUCTURAL AND REACTIVITY INSIGHTS INTO SULFATED α-1 LINKED LIGNIN DERIVATIVES: A DFT-BASED COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Source abstract
Abstract
This work aims to study the structure, charge distribution, and vibrational characteristics of α-1 lignin and α-1 lignin sulfate molecules based on density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of theory. The addition of a sulfur group to the α-1 molecule resulted in the formation of the α-1 lignin sulfate molecule, and the geometry of the O-H bond changed. Based on the APT (Atomic Polar Tensor) and Mulliken charge distribution, the charge of the α-1 lignin sulfate molecule was significantly different from that of α-1 lignin, indicating that it had a larger polarization, which was important in intermolecular interactions. In addition, the molecular electropotential (MEP) map showed that the α-1 lignin sulfate molecule has a large number of nucleophilic and electrophilic sites that are active in hydrogen (H)-bonding. The α-1 molecule is highly reactive, as indicated by the small HOMO-LUMO energy gap. Based on the global reactivity properties, the α-1 molecule is more nucleophilic than α-1 lignin sulfate, which indicates its chemical stability. The presence of vibrations of the O-H, C-H, N-H, C=C, and S-O functional groups in these molecules was theoretically calculated, which was in agreement with the experimental results (scaled at 0.9608). In general, the α-1 lignin sulfate molecule has strong polarizability, structure, and reactivity, which may be used in materials science and biological sensors in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis · Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 J. Zakzeski, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, A. L. Jongerius and B. M. Weckhuysen, Chem. Rev., 110, 3552 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900354u10.1021/cr900354u ↗
2. 2 C. G. Boeriu, D. Bravo, R. J. A. Gosselink and J. E. G. Dam, Ind. Crop. Prod., 20, 205 (2004)10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.022 ↗
3. 3 A. Sand and J. Tuteja (Eds.), "Lignin - Chemistry, Structure, and Application", IntechOpen, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.10226310.5772/intechopen.102263 ↗
4. 4 A. Vishtal and A. Kraslawski, BioResources, 6, 3547 (2011)10.15376/biores.6.3.vishtal ↗
5. 5 Yu. N. Malyar, A. S. Kazachenko, N. Yu. Vasilyeva, O. Yu. Fetisova, V. S. Borovkova et al., Catal. Today, 399, 397 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2021.07.03310.1016/j.cattod.2021.07.033 ↗
6. 6 T. Tang, J. Fei, Y. Zheng, J. Xu, H. He et al., ChemistrySelect, 8, e202204941 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20220494110.1002/slct.202204941 ↗
7. 7 T. Aro and P. Fatehi, ChemSusChem, 10, 1861 (2017)10.1002/cssc.201700082 ↗
8. 8 J. Ruwoldt, "Emulsion Stabilization with Lignosulfonates", IntechOpen, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.10733610.5772/intechopen.107336 ↗
9. 9 C. W. Lahive, P. C. J. Kamer, C. S. Lancefield and P. J. Deuss, ChemSusChem, 13, 4238 (2020)10.1002/cssc.202000989 ↗
10. 10 L. Yang, K. Seshan and Y. Li, Catal. Today, 298, 276 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.03010.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.030 ↗
11. 11 O. P. Taran, A. V. Miroshnikova, S. V. Baryshnikov, A. S. Kazachenko, A. M. Skripnikov et al., Catalysts, 12, 1384 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1211138410.3390/catal12111384 ↗
12. 12 K. P. Zois and D. Tzeli, Atoms, 12, 65 (2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms1212006510.3390/atoms12120065 ↗
13. 13 A. S. Kazachenko, F. Akman, N. Y. Vasilieva, N. Issaoui, Y. N. Malyar et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 1602 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2303160210.3390/ijms23031602 ↗
14. 14 V. Mehmeti and M. Sadiku, Computation, 10, 68 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/computation1005006810.3390/computation10050068 ↗
15. 15 A. S. Kazachenko, F. Akman, N. Y. Vasilieva, Y. N. Malyar, O. Y. Fetisova et al., Polymers, 14, 3000 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1415300010.3390/polym14153000 ↗
16. 16 F. Akman, A. S. Kazachenko and Y. Malyar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 41 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.0510.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.05 ↗
17. 17 A. S. Kazachenko, F. Akman, U. Holikulov, A. Jumabaev and Yu. N. Malyar, Mendeleev Commun., 36, 260 (2026), https://doi.org/10.71267/mencom.791010.71267/mencom.7910 ↗
18. 18 M. H. Paulson, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 29, 556 (1952), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0263265110.1007/BF02632651 ↗
19. 19 G. Dado and R. Bernhardt, in "Kirk Othmer Encyclyclopedia of Chemical Technology", John Wiley and Sons, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.1921120611140107.a01.pub310.1002/0471238961.1921120611140107.a01.pub3 ↗
20. 20 M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb et al., Gaussian 09, Revision D.1, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT (2009)
21. 21 R. Dennington, T. Keith and J. Millam, GaussView, Version 6, Semichem Inc., Shawnee Mission, KS (2016)
22. 22 A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 98, 7 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
23. 23 C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 37, 785 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
24. 24 A. Jumabaev, H. Hushvaktov, A. Absanov, I. Doroshenko and B. Khudaykulov, J. Low Temp. Phys., 51, 2 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1063/10.003540410.1063/10.0035404 ↗
25. 25 A. Jumabaev, B. Khudaykulov, U. Holikulov, A. Norkulov, J. Subbiah et al., Opt. Mater., 159, 116683 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2025.11668310.1016/j.optmat.2025.116683 ↗
26. 26 S. Yormatov, U. Holikulov and A. Jumabaev, Monatsh Chem., 157, 35 (2026), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-025-03402-910.1007/s00706-025-03402-9 ↗
27. 27 A. Jumabaev, S. J. Koyambo-Konzapa and H. Hushvaktov, J. Mol. Model., 30, 349 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-024-06147-010.1007/s00894-024-06147-0 ↗
28. 28 U. Sherefedin, A. Belay, K. Gudishe, A. Kebede, A. G. Kumela et al., Results Phys., 68, 108083 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2024.10808310.1016/j.rinp.2024.108083 ↗
29. 29 N. A. B. Beigloo, V. H. Rezvan, G. Ebrahimzadeh-Rajaei and A. Shamel, J. Mol. Struct., 1322, 140469 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.14046910.1016/j.molstruc.2024.140469 ↗
30. 30 V. H. Rezvan, Results Chem., 7, 101437 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2024.10143710.1016/j.rechem.2024.101437 ↗
31. 31 B. Khudaykulov, A. Norkulov, U. Holikulov, A. Absanov, I. Doroshenko et al., J. Low Temp. Phys., 51, 2 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1063/10.003540610.1063/10.0035406 ↗
32. 32 E. Taniş, F. Akman and U. Holikulov, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B, 20, 150 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1134/S199079312570152010.1134/S1990793125701520 ↗
33. 33 A. Jumabaev, H. Hushvaktov and A. Absanov, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 88, 1660 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1134/S106287382470802X10.1134/S106287382470802X ↗
34. 34 N. Sundaraganesan, B. Dominic Joshua, M. Rajamoorthy and C. H. Gangadhar, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 45, 969 (2007)
35. 35 J. Coates, in "Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry", edited by R. A. Meyers, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2000, p. 10815
36. 36 M. Jeyavijayan and M. Arivazhagan, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 48, 869 (2010)
37. 37 N. R. Babu, S. Subashchandrabose, M. S. A. Padusha, H. Saleem and Y. Erdoğdu, Spectrochim. Acta A, 120, 314 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.09.08910.1016/j.saa.2013.09.089 ↗
38. "