Enhanced Solar-to-Fuel Efficiency of Ceria-Based Thermochemical Cycles via Integrated Electrochemical Oxygen Pumping
Source abstract
Abstract
The solar thermochemical cycle based on ceria is a promising route for renewable fuel production. The solar-to-fuel efficiency of a thermochemical reactor is highly dependent on the oxygen removal during the reduction step. Conventional nitrogen sweeping (NS) requires high heating load and additional gas separation work, which limit the reactor efficiency. We propose the integration of a high-temperature electrochemical oxygen pump (EOP) for in situ oxygen removal to minimize the heating load and to allow for effective oxygen pumping. A transient model was developed to quantify the reactor performance using EOP or NS schemes. The model predicted that the ceria nonstoichiometric coefficient at the end of the reduction was enhanced by 56.8% when using the EOP scheme compared to the NS scheme. Correspondingly, the solar-to-fuel efficiency enhancement factor was 1.64 at reference conditions. In addition, the EOP scheme showed more uniform temperature and species concentration distributions, leading to a more favorable thermo-mechanical stability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China
SUSTech Energy Institute for Carbon Neutrality, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
Laboratory of Renewable Energy Science and Engineering, EPFL, Station 9, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.solener.2003.12.01210.1016/j.solener.2003.12.012 ↗
2. 10.1039/C8EE00111A10.1039/C8EE00111A ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0075810.1021/acsenergylett.1c00758 ↗
4. 10.1039/c2ee21275g10.1039/c2ee21275g ↗
5. 10.1126/science.119783410.1126/science.1197834 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.123945410.1126/science.1239454 ↗
7. 10.1063/5.005528210.1063/5.0055282 ↗
8. 10.1098/rsta.2010.011410.1098/rsta.2010.0114 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.solener.2005.12.00510.1016/j.solener.2005.12.005 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6EE03776C10.1039/C6EE03776C ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-3697(76)90017-210.1016/0022-3697(76)90017-2 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00318-510.1016/S0167-2738(99)00318-5 ↗
13. 10.1098/rsta.2010.011410.1098/rsta.2010.0114 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.123945410.1126/science.1239454 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03273.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03273.x ↗
16. Haxel G. · 2002
17. 10.1038/s41586-021-04174-y10.1038/s41586-021-04174-y ↗
18. 10.1002/ente.20210022210.1002/ente.202100222 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solener.2016.11.02310.1016/j.solener.2016.11.023 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.00610.1016/j.energy.2015.06.006 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.06310.1016/j.solener.2018.05.063 ↗
22. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.65.25710.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.65.257 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.09.00110.1016/j.snb.2009.09.001 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.493486010.1063/1.4934860 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.009 ↗
26. 10.1016/b978-0-12-420155-2.00005-010.1016/b978-0-12-420155-2.00005-0 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.291315210.1149/1.2913152 ↗