journal article·2025-07-11

Deciphering the Controversial Role of Sacrificial Agents in Photocatalytic H2O2 Production: Promoters or Source of Artifacts?

Jingya Xin, Jingfan Shao, Xiaohan Yu, Wei Huang, Yanguang Li

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 10· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Photocatalytic H 2 O 2 synthesis holds great promise for sustainable H 2 O 2 production. While extensive efforts have focused on optimizing catalysts and reaction conditions to enhance H 2 O 2 yields, the accuracy of H 2 O 2 quantification─a fundamental prerequisite for reliable performance evaluation─remains underexplored. Conventional colorimetric methods can be compromised by the widespread use of organic sacrificial agents due to their intrinsic redox activity and optical absorption properties. Herein, we systematically investigate the interference effects of common sacrificial agents and their oxidation products on H 2 O 2 quantification across several established colorimetric assays. Our results reveal that quantification inaccuracies arise from a combination of factors, including pre-existing H 2 O 2 contamination, spectral overlap, unintended redox reactions, and self-sensitization effects. Drawing from these findings, we propose practical guidelines for selecting compatible sacrificial agents, detection methods, and excitation wavelengths to minimize analytical artifacts and enable accurate evaluation of photocatalytic H 2 O 2 production.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM)

Soochow University

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Negative Carbon Technologies

Funding

Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/cssc.20160089510.1002/cssc.201600895 ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20050377910.1002/anie.200503779 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.10081910.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100819 ↗
4. 10.1002/cctc.20180143510.1002/cctc.201801435 ↗
5. 10.1039/D0CS00458H10.1039/D0CS00458H ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20240074010.1002/aenm.202400740 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mattod.2023.10.00510.1016/j.mattod.2023.10.005 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12274-021-3882-110.1007/s12274-021-3882-1 ↗
9. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0021710.1021/acscatal.8b00217 ↗
10. 10.1039/D4EE01808G10.1039/D4EE01808G ↗
11. 10.1039/D1CS01164B10.1039/D1CS01164B ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.00910.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.009 ↗
13. 10.1039/D3NR00260H10.1039/D3NR00260H ↗
14. 10.1039/D0SE01322F10.1039/D0SE01322F ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0019710.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00197 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41560-019-0456-510.1038/s41560-019-0456-5 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0201010.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02010 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20230948010.1002/anie.202309480 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20230434910.1002/anie.202304349 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20240576310.1002/anie.202405763 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-025-55894-y10.1038/s41467-025-55894-y ↗
22. 10.1039/D3TA03966H10.1039/D3TA03966H ↗
23. 10.1038/s41929-023-00980-x10.1038/s41929-023-00980-x ↗
24. 10.1021/ac60103a04210.1021/ac60103a042 ↗
25. 10.1002/ppap.20210006210.1002/ppap.202100062 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13055610.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130556 ↗
27. 10.1021/ac60267a01610.1021/ac60267a016 ↗
28. 10.1016/0891-5849(95)00020-X10.1016/0891-5849(95)00020-X ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-024-52405-310.1038/s41467-024-52405-3 ↗
30. 10.1039/C9RA06490G10.1039/C9RA06490G ↗
31. 10.3762/bjoc.16.7610.3762/bjoc.16.76 ↗
32. 10.1002/cctc.20180028410.1002/cctc.201800284 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20230308610.1002/anie.202303086 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20230898010.1002/anie.202308980 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja00023a03210.1021/ja00023a032 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0016110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161 ↗