Evaluating Fire and Smoke Risks with Lithium-Ion Cells, Modules, and Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The study included characterization of the components of fire and smoke during thermal runaway for NMC and LFP cells, modules, and batteries and to determine if the size and volume of fire and smoke released scaleup linearly when one goes from the cell to module and then to a battery configuration for the same cathode chemistry. Thermal runaway tests were conducted in ambient as well as inert environments to characterize gas release with and without combustion. During thermal runaway, the test articles exhibited fire, smoke, or both. Gas analysis exhibited hydrocarbons as well as hydrogen and carbon dioxide that could accumulate above the lower flammability limit (LFL) of the gas mixture if released into an enclosure. The nature of fire and volume of smoke released do not always scale linearly with an increasing number of cells, showing that testing in the relevant configuration and environment is imperative. A good understanding of gases released into a certain enclosed space will help with safer vent and deflagration designs and provide a warning to first responders and firefighters of the expected nature of gases.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrochemical Safety Research Institute
UL Research Institutes
Fire Research and Development in UL Solutions
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.05.01310.1016/j.ensm.2017.05.013 ↗
2. Nam, H.W. Firms angry as gov’t blames battery cell for ESS fires. The Korea Times, February 6, 2020. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2020/12/515_283022.html (accessed September 11, 2021).
3. McKinnon, M. B.; DeCrane, S.; Kerber, S. Four Firefighters Injured In Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage System Explosion - Arizona; Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Fire Safety Research Institute: Columbia, MD, 2020. https://fsri.org/research-update/report-four-firefighters-injured-lithium-ion-battery-energy-storage-system (accessed 2024–06–09).
4. Accident analysis of Beijing Jimei Dahongmen 25 MWh DC solar storage-charging integrated station project; China Electric Power Technology Co., Ltd., Institute of Energy Storage and Novel Electric Technology, 2021. https://www.ctif.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/Accidental%20analysis%20%281%29.pdf (accessed June 9, 2024).
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0193910.1021/acsenergylett.3c01939 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0072410.1021/acsenergylett.3c00724 ↗
7. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac53cc10.1149/1945-7111/ac53cc ↗
8. 10.3390/batteries401000310.3390/batteries4010003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.038 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0242810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02428 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.139189310.1149/1.1391893 ↗
12. 10.1039/c1ee01786a10.1039/c1ee01786a ↗
13. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00488-310.1016/S0378-7753(02)00488-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.051 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22725710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227257 ↗
16. 10.3390/batteries202000910.3390/batteries2020009 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-017-09784-z10.1038/s41598-017-09784-z ↗
18. Maloney, T. Lithium Battery Thermal Runaway Vent Gas Analysis; DOT/FAA/TC-15/59; Federal Aviation Administration, William J. Hughes Technical Center: Atlantic City International Airport, NJ, 2016. https://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/pdf/TC-15-59.pdf (accessed June 9, 2024).
19. 10.1149/1945-7111/abbe5a10.1149/1945-7111/abbe5a ↗
20. 10.3390/batteries602003010.3390/batteries6020030 ↗
21. 10.3390/batteries702002510.3390/batteries7020025 ↗
22. Opert, K.; Gandhi, P.; Chapin, T. J. Fire Hazards from 18650 Li-ion Cells Used in Electronic Items for Aviation. The Ninth Triennial International Fire & Cabin Safety Research Conference, 2019. https://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/2019Conference/files/Battery_IV/GandhiLi-ionCellsElectronicItems/Kelly%20Opert%20-%20OpertFireHazardsLiionCellsAviationPres.pptx (accessed June 9, 2024).
23. Lecocq, A.; Bertana, M.; Truchot, B.; Marlair, G. Comparison of the Fire Consequences of an Electric Vehicle and an Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle. International Conference on Fires In Vehicles - FIVE 2012, Chicago, United States, September 2012; pp 183–194.
24. Bisschop R. · 2019
25. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10077510.1016/j.est.2019.100775 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.pecs.2019.03.00210.1016/j.pecs.2019.03.002 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.F07122if10.1149/2.F07122if ↗
28. 10.1149/1.355770410.1149/1.3557704 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0140010.1021/acsenergylett.2c01400 ↗
30. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab84fa10.1149/1945-7111/ab84fa ↗
31. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Standard for Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage Systems; UL 9540A; 2019. UL 9540A | UL Standards & Engagement | UL Standard (shopulstandards.com; accessed October 4, 2024).
32. National Fire Protection Association. Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting; Standard NFPA 68; 2018. NFPA 68 Standard Development (accessed October 4, 2024).