Enhanced SOC Estimation for LFP Batteries: A Synergistic Approach Using Coulomb Counting Reset, Machine Learning, and Relaxation
Source abstract
Abstract
State-of-charge (SOC) estimation for lithium–iron phosphate (LFP) batteries is a challenging task due to their path-dependent behavior, flat open circuit voltage (OCV) characteristics, and hysteresis effects. This work proposes a machine-learning-based SOC estimation method designed for onboard applications, addressing the challenges of SOC initialization when using the Coulomb counting method. The proposed approach relies on low sampling frequency measurements during short-term rest periods. Experiments were conducted on LFP 26650 cells across more than 430 working conditions, involving four temperatures, three current rates, four cycling scenarios, with various resting periods at different SOC levels. A comprehensive analysis of SOC estimation errors, including initial value errors, sensor noise, and sampling frequency, is provided. Using relaxation voltage data recorded at intervals as short as 1 min, the SOC resetting estimation solution proposed in this paper achieves mean absolute errors lower than 3.25%, demonstrating its potential for real-world applications. This solution can be readily integrated into existing battery management systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 367 Panama Street, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Department of Energy, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7K, Aalborg 9220, Denmark
College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University, 174 Shazheng St., Chongqing 40044, China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.01810.1016/j.joule.2023.07.018 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.00910.1016/j.joule.2019.11.009 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0007710.1021/acsenergylett.2c00077 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.etran.2023.10030510.1016/j.etran.2023.100305 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10969610.1016/j.est.2023.109696 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41560-023-01355-z10.1038/s41560-023-01355-z ↗
7. 10.1109/MIE.2013.225035110.1109/MIE.2013.2250351 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.00110.1016/j.rser.2017.05.001 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat273010.1038/nmat2730 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41598-019-51474-510.1038/s41598-019-51474-5 ↗
11. Plett G. L. · 2015
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.03210.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23188910.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231889 ↗
14. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac71d210.1149/1945-7111/ac71d2 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41524-024-01197-710.1038/s41524-024-01197-7 ↗
16. Newman J. · 2021
17. 10.1109/TVT.2017.274988210.1109/TVT.2017.2749882 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13523910.1016/j.electacta.2019.135239 ↗
19. 10.1109/TIE.2021.307167910.1109/TIE.2021.3071679 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.04410.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.044 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.05710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.057 ↗
22. 10.3390/en610508810.3390/en6105088 ↗
23. Taborelli, C.; Onori, S. State of charge estimation using extended Kalman filters for battery management system. In 2014 IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference (IEVC) ; IEEE, 2014; pp 1–8.10.1109/IEVC.2014.7056126.10.1109/IEVC.2014.7056126 ↗
24. 10.1002/er.733910.1002/er.7339 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11940310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119403 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14992310.1016/j.cej.2024.149923 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0074310.1021/acsenergylett.1c00743 ↗
28. 10.4271/14-14-01-000310.4271/14-14-01-0003 ↗