journal article·2022-03-01Open access

RADIATION SYNTHESIS OF POLY(CHITOSAN/ACRYLAMIDE) HYDROGEL FOR REMOVAL OF NIGROSIN FROM ITS AQUEOUS SOLUTION

Radiation Research of Polymer Chemistry Department, Industrial Irradiation Division, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt, ASHRAF M. ABDEL-GHAFFAR, HUSSEIN EL-SHAHAT ALI, Radiation Chemistry Department, Radiation Research Division, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt, MAYSARA EL-SAYED ABOULFOTOUH, Radiation Research of Polymer Chemistry Department, Industrial Irradiation Division, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt, NAEEM MOHAMED EL-SAWY, Radiation Research of Polymer Chemistry Department, Industrial Irradiation Division, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, P.O. Box 29, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 56· Issue 1-2

Abstract

"Chitosan hydrogels were prepared by gamma radiation grafting of acrylamide (AAm) onto chitosan (CS). The gelation (%) increased as the AAm content was raised up to the CS/AAm ratio of 1/10 wt%. The grafting yield and the grafting ratios of the Poly(CS/AAm) hydrogel were found to be directly proportional to the increase in AAm contents. The swelling behavior was more pronounced with higher AAm content up to 1/15 wt% in the Poly(CS/AAm), and then decreased with further rise of the AAm content to 1/20 wt%, because of the formation of a highly crosslinked hydrogel, with high hydrogen bonding. The prepared Poly(CS/AAm) hydrogels were characterized by using FTIR, TGA and SEM techniques. The analysis confirmed successful preparation of Poly(CS/AAm) with different compositions. The adsorption capacity of the Poly(CS/AAm) hydrogel with the composition of (1:10 wt%) towards Nigrosin acid dye was found to be higher than that of the other hydrogel formulations. This may be due to the fact that the selected Poly(CS/AAm) hydrogel possesses a highly pronounced swelling behavior and a highly crosslinked structure, compared to the other prepared hydrogels. It has been also noted that the adsorption capacity of the 1:10 wt% Poly(CS/AAm) hydrogel enhanced markedly at pH 2, but decreased at higher pH values, namely, from pH 5 to pH 7.4. This can be explained by the protonation of amide groups of acrylamide and amine groups of chitosan occurring at lower pH. The high adsorption properties of the selected Poly(CS/AAm) hydrogel recommend it as a necessary bioremediation solution to face the high level of acid dye pollutants, such as Nigrosin, in industrial effluents."
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 B. Tsai, O. Garcia-Valdez, P. Champagne and M. F. Cunningham, Processes, 5, 12 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3390/pr501001210.3390/pr5010012 ↗
2. 2 S. Dawood and T. K. Sen, J. Chem. Process Eng., 1, 104 (2014), https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/48131
3. 3 G. Crini, Bioresour. Technol., 97, 1061 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.00110.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001 ↗
4. 4 J. O. Gonçalves, J. P. Santos, E. C. Rios, M. M. Crispim, G. L. Dotto et al., J. Mol. Liquids, 225, 265 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.06710.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.067 ↗
5. 5 F. Ullah, M. B. H. Othman, F. Javed, Z. Ahmad and H. Md. Akil, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 57, 414 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.05310.1016/j.msec.2015.07.053 ↗
6. 6 M. M. Nasef and O. Güven, Progress Polym. Sci., 37, 1597 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.004 ↗
7. 7 M. A. Ahmad, N. A. A. Puad and O. S. Bello, Water Res. Ind., 6, 18 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2014.06.00210.1016/j.wri.2014.06.002 ↗
8. 8 A. Khawar, Z. Aslam, S. Javed and A. Abbas, Chem. Eng. Commun., 205, 1 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.146059810.1080/00986445.2018.1460598 ↗
9. 9 M. N. Mahamad, M. A. A. Zaini and Z. A. Zakaria, Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad., 102, 274 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.00910.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.009 ↗
10. 10 M. Samiullah, Z. Aslam, A. G. Rana, A. Abbas and W. Ahmad, Water Air Soil Pollut., 229, 113 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3758-510.1007/s11270-018-3758-5 ↗
11. 11 A. Zahir, Z. Aslam, M. S. Kamal, W. Ahmad, A. Abbas et al., J. Mol. Liquids, 244, 211 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.00610.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.006 ↗
12. 12 R. Saravanan, E. Thirumal, V. K. Gupta, V. Narayanan and A. Stephen, J. Mol. Liquids, 177, 394 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2012.10.01810.1016/j.molliq.2012.10.018 ↗
13. 13 R. Saravanan, N. Karthikeyan, V. K. Gupta, E. Thirumal, P. Thangadurai et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 33, 2235 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.04610.1016/j.msec.2013.01.046 ↗
14. 14 A. Asfaram, M. Ghaedi, S. Agarwal, I. Tyagi and V. Kumar Gupta, RSC Adv., 5, 18438 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15637D10.1039/C4RA15637D ↗
15. 15 R. Saravanan, M. Mansoob Khan, V. K. Gupta, E. Mosquera, F. Gracia et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 452, 126 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.04.03510.1016/j.jcis.2015.04.035 ↗
16. 16 V. K. Gupta, N. Atar, M. L. Yola, Z. Üstündağ and L. Uzun, Water Res., 48, 210 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.02710.1016/j.watres.2013.09.027 ↗
17. 17 R. Saravanan, V. K. Gupta, E. Mosquera and F. Gracia, J. Mol. Liquids, 198, 409 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2014.07.03010.1016/j.molliq.2014.07.030 ↗
18. 18 R. Saravanan, V. K. Gupta, V. Narayanan and A. Stephen, J. Mol. Liquids, 181, 133 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2013.02.02310.1016/j.molliq.2013.02.023 ↗
19. 19 V. K. Gupta, I. Ali, T. A. Saleh, M. N. Siddiqui and S. Agarwal, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 20, 1261 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0950-910.1007/s11356-012-0950-9 ↗
20. 20 R. Saravanan, V. K. Gupta, V. Narayanan and A. Stephen, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 1910 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.12.02110.1016/j.jtice.2013.12.021 ↗
21. 21 V. K. Gupta, C. K. Jain, I. Ali, S. Chandra and S. Agarwal, Water Res., 36, 2483 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00474-210.1016/S0043-1354(01)00474-2 ↗
22. 22 I. Tahira, Z. Aslama, A. Abbas, M. Monim-ul-Mehboob, S. Ali et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 136, 1209 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.17310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.173 ↗
23. 23 J. Park and Y. Nho, Polymer Korea, 21, 325 (1997), http://journal.polymer-korea.or.kr/journal/archive/view/1614
24. 24 G. Z. Kyzas, J. Fu and K. A. Matis, Materials, 6, 5131 (2013), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma611513110.3390/ma6115131 ↗
25. 25 A. Anitha, S. Sowmya, P. T. S. Kumara, S. Deepth, K. P. Chennazh, et al., Progress Polym. Sci., 39, 1644 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.008 ↗
26. 26 D. Xu, S. Hein, L. S. Loo and K. Wang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 6343 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101987w10.1021/ie101987w ↗
27. 27 D. Kumar, S. Gihar, M. K. Shrivash, P. Kumar and P. P. Kundu, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 163, 2097 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.06010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.060 ↗
28. 28 G. Z. Kyzas and D. N. Bikiaris, Marine Drugs, 13, 312 (2015), https://doi.org/10.3390/md1301031210.3390/md13010312 ↗
29. 29 L. Wojnárovits, Cs. M Földváry and E. Takács, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 79, 848 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.02.00610.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.02.006 ↗
30. 30 K. Hemvichian, A. Chanthawong and P. Suwanmala, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 103, 167 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.05.06410.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.05.064 ↗
31. 31 A. M. Abdel Ghaffar, M. B. El-Arnaouty, A. A. Abdel Baky and S. A. Shama, Des. Monomers Polym., 19, 706 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/15685551.2016.120963010.1080/15685551.2016.1209630 ↗
32. 32 M. B. El-Arnaouty, A. M. Abdel Ghaffar, A. A. Abdel Baky and S. A. Shama, J. Vinyl Addit. Technol., 25, E35 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.2175110.1002/vnl.21751 ↗
33. 33 A. M. Abdel Ghaffar, M. B. El-Arnaouty, A. A. Abdel Baky and S. A. Shama, J. Vinyl Addit. Technol., 26, 362 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.2175110.1002/vnl.21751 ↗
34. 34 A. G. Ibrahim, A. Z. Sayed, H. Abd El-Wahab and M. M. Sayah, Am. J. Polym. Sci. Technol., 5, 55 (2019), https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpst.20190502.1310.11648/j.ajpst.20190502.13 ↗
35. 35 A. M Abdel Ghaffar, F. I A. El-Fadl and N. M El-Sawy, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., in press (2022), https://doi.org/10.1177/089270572092514210.1177/0892705720925142 ↗
36. 36 P. Bonina, Ts. Petrova and N. Manolova, J. Bioactive Compat. Polym., 19, 101 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1177/088391150404264210.1177/0883911504042642 ↗
37. 37 S. Zhao, F. Zhou, L. Li, M. Cao, D. Zuo et al., Composites: Part B, 43, 1570 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.015 ↗
38. 38 Q. Wang, L. Liang, F. Xi, G. Tian, Q. Mao et al., Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, 3469579 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/346957910.1155/2020/3469579 ↗
39. 39 C. B. Paz, R. S. Araújo, L. F. Oton, A. C. Oliveira, J. M. Soares et al., Materials (Basel), 13, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1305110710.3390/ma13051107 ↗
40. 40 E. Kalkan, H. Nadaroglu, N. Celebi, H. Celik and E. Tasgin, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 24, 115 (2015), https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/2379710.15244/pjoes/23797 ↗
41. 41 M. Wawrzkiewicz, B. Podkościelna and P. Podkościelny, Molecules, 25, 5247 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2522524710.3390/molecules25225247 ↗
42. "