journal article·2022-11-11Open access

Catalytic Proton–Hydroxide Recombination for Forward-Bias Bipolar Membranes

James B. Mitchell, Lihaokun Chen, Kurt Langworthy, Kevin Fabrizio, Shannon W. Boettcher

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 7· Issue 11

Abstract

Bipolar membranes (BPMs) can generate steady-state pH gradients in electrochemical cells, enabling half-reactions to occur in different pH environments, and are thus of broad interest. Forward-bias BPMs further enable new approaches to fuel cells, redox-flow batteries, and CO2 electrolyzers. In forward bias, the gradient in electrochemical potential drives ionic charge carriers toward the bipolar junction where they can recombine. We use a H2-pump electrochemical cell to study H+/OH– recombination at the bipolar junction. We discover that metal-oxide nanoparticles catalyze the recombination reaction in the bipolar junction under forward bias and find evidence that H+/OH– recombination occurs via a surface mechanism on the oxide catalyst. We propose a rate equation to describe the catalytic H+/OH– recombination mechanism, supported by numerical simulations. This work thus elucidates materials-design strategies for recombination catalysts to advance forward-bias BPM technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Oregon Center for Electrochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon97403, United States

Center for Advanced Materials Characterization in Oregon, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon97403, United States

Funding

Office of Naval Research

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11853810.1016/j.memsci.2020.118538 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.05110.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0282910.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02829 ↗
4. 10.1023/A:101688221628710.1023/A:1016882216287 ↗
5. 10.1080/15422119.2015.112895110.1080/15422119.2015.1128951 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cep.2003.11.01010.1016/j.cep.2003.11.010 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0068710.1021/acsaem.0c00687 ↗
8. 10.1002/adsu.20170018710.1002/adsu.201700187 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0207810.1021/acsenergylett.0c02078 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0112710.1021/acsaem.0c01127 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0055710.1021/acsenergylett.6b00557 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11853810.1016/j.memsci.2020.118538 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aaz148710.1126/science.aaz1487 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0114010.1021/acsaem.1c01140 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp903252u10.1021/jp903252u ↗
16. 10.1149/2.1041712jes10.1149/2.1041712jes ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.06.00410.1016/j.electacta.2005.06.004 ↗
18. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c0021710.1021/acscentsci.1c00217 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.1221816jes10.1149/2.1221816jes ↗
20. 10.1149/1945-7111/abf06310.1149/1945-7111/abf063 ↗
21. 10.1021/accountsmr.1c0011310.1021/accountsmr.1c00113 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-020-20131-110.1038/s41467-020-20131-1 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0388510.1021/acs.iecr.7b03885 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-022-31429-710.1038/s41467-022-31429-7 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.0941614jes10.1149/2.0941614jes ↗
26. 10.1063/1.174954110.1063/1.1749541 ↗
27. Langevin P. · Ann. Chim. Phys. · 1903 · 28 · 122
28. 10.1002/bbpc.1955059102010.1002/bbpc.19550591020 ↗
29. 10.1021/j100258a03510.1021/j100258a035 ↗
30. 10.1038/280824a010.1038/280824a0 ↗
31. Bunker, B. C.; Casey, W. H. The Aqueous Chemistry of Oxides; Oxford University Press: New York, 2016; pp 132–162.10.1093/oso/9780199384259.001.0001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11974810.1016/j.memsci.2021.119748 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.01610.1016/j.joule.2021.06.016 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20150089110.1002/adma.201500891 ↗