Effect of Microstructure on the Cycling Behavior of Li–In Alloy Anodes for Solid-State Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Indium–lithium alloys operating in the two-phase region of indium metal and the InLi intermetallic are the counter and reference electrodes of choice in two-electrode solid-state batteries. At high current densities on both charge and discharge, they offer low polarization, good accessible capacity, and good cycle life. By synthesizing a phase pure InLi intermetallic and measuring its diffusion and mechanical properties, it is clear that the electrochemical performance is attributable to measured fast diffusion kinetics in the InLi intermetallic, D Li 298K = 5.5 × 10 –7 cm 2 s –1 . The indium metal phase is essentially ion-blocking, so the performance is tied to the microstructure, which evolves with cycling. A simple two-layer microstructure is proposed, based on the fundamental understanding established, which maximizes performance. Despite the limitations of indium-based alloys in commercial applications, the lessons learned can be extended to other fast-conducting lithium intermetallics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom
The Faraday Institution, Quad One, Didcot OX11 0RA, United Kingdom
Funding
Faraday Institution
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. 10.1088/2515-7655/ab95f410.1088/2515-7655/ab95f4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.01810.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.018 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41563-021-00967-810.1038/s41563-021-00967-8 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41563-019-0438-910.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0421610.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04216 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.10118310.1016/j.mtener.2022.101183 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-023-36401-710.1038/s41467-023-36401-7 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20230133810.1002/aenm.202301338 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41560-023-01208-910.1038/s41560-023-01208-9 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20220193910.1002/aenm.202201939 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253710.1021/acsami.9b02537 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41586-023-05970-410.1038/s41586-023-05970-4 ↗
14. 10.1002/batt.20180014910.1002/batt.201800149 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16651710.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166517 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-021-27311-710.1038/s41467-021-27311-7 ↗
17. 10.1557/s43578-021-00186-610.1557/s43578-021-00186-6 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11661-999-0051-710.1007/s11661-999-0051-7 ↗
19. Aspinall, J. Lithium magnesium alloys: a framework for investigating lithium alloy anodes for solid state batteries. Research Square, 2023, Version 1.10.21203/rs.3.rs-2688902/v1 ↗
20. 10.1016/0921-5093(88)90055-X10.1016/0921-5093(88)90055-X ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0788010.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07880 ↗
22. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1402040710.3390/ma14020407 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.01610.1016/j.joule.2022.05.016 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0067610.1021/acs.chemmater.3c00676 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.06510.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.065 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.11110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.111 ↗
28. 10.1149/1945-7111/accb6f10.1149/1945-7111/accb6f ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.10084010.1016/j.mtener.2021.100840 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
31. 10.1149/2.0601902jes10.1149/2.0601902jes ↗