journal article·2022-01-14

Pulse Symmetry Impacts the C2 Product Selectivity in Pulsed Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

Rileigh Casebolt DiDomenico, Tobias Hanrath

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 7· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Pulsed electrochemical CO2 reduction has emerged as an attractive approach to direct product selectivity and activity. The versatility of the pulse profile creates opportunities to study fundamental processes and optimize reaction conditions. We examined the effects of applied pulse potential, duration, and shape to understand the interfacial reaction environment with an eye toward optimized C2 product formation. We present an electrochemical analysis to show that upper pulse potentials with positive anodic current (indicative of anion coadsorption) improve reaction stability and enhance C2 selectivity (reaching 76% FE). Interestingly, whereas changing pulse duration had little to no effect on C2 selectivity, we found that pulse symmetry significantly affected selectivity. Notably, symmetric pulses most selectively produce C2 products. We discuss the relationship between pulse symmetry and selectivity in the context of COads coverage and C–C coupling reaction energy landscape as a result of anion coadsorption, increased interfacial charge, and electric field variation effects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Ionic liquids properties and applications · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Robert F. Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States

Funding

Cornell University · Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.06510.1016/j.jece.2018.08.065 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0070510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
3. 10.1002/cssc.20160039410.1002/cssc.201600394 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.01410.1016/j.joule.2021.05.014 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0333610.1021/acscatal.0c03336 ↗
6. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0220110.1021/acscatal.0c02201 ↗
7. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0160610.1021/acscatal.9b01606 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5CP05665A10.1039/C5CP05665A ↗
9. 10.1038/s41929-017-0009-x10.1038/s41929-017-0009-x ↗
10. 10.1002/celc.20160006810.1002/celc.201600068 ↗
11. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0255010.1021/acscatal.5b02550 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0403710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04037 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-020-0594-910.1038/s41560-020-0594-9 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0263010.1021/acscatal.0c02630 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0089610.1021/acscatal.9b00896 ↗
16. 10.1002/celc.20200144510.1002/celc.202001445 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0091815jes10.1149/2.0091815jes ↗
18. 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.10686110.1016/j.elecom.2020.106861 ↗
19. 10.1002/cssc.20180031810.1002/cssc.201800318 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10800-005-9058-y10.1007/s10800-005-9058-y ↗
21. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0085710.1021/acscatal.6b00857 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.0c1766810.1021/acsami.0c17668 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20201718110.1002/anie.202017181 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11544610.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115446 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-020-16998-910.1038/s41467-020-16998-9 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0147810.1021/acscatal.1c01478 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c1079210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10792 ↗
28. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0291510.1021/acscatal.0c02915 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20210411410.1002/anie.202104114 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0106210.1021/acsomega.1c01062 ↗
31. 10.1039/C9EE01341E10.1039/C9EE01341E ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.7b0676510.1021/jacs.7b06765 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.7b1014210.1021/jacs.7b10142 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0581606jes10.1149/2.0581606jes ↗
35. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0229910.1021/acscatal.6b02299 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0142710.1021/acsaem.1c01427 ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20201633210.1002/anie.202016332 ↗
38. 10.1039/C9SE01318K10.1039/C9SE01318K ↗