SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CELLULOSE AND CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS FROM DEAD SEAGRASS – TOWARDS THE WEALTH FROM WASTE CONCEPT"
Source abstract
Abstract
"The study has demonstrated that decaying seagrass accumulated along the shores is a particularly good source of cellulose and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). The FTIR spectra indicated the presence of O-H and C-H bonds in both the cellulose and CNCs obtained from the seagrass biomass. The Micro-Raman spectra showed maximum peaks at 1277 cm-1 for cellulose and at 1108 cm-1 for CNCs. The XRD spectra of cellulose confirmed its crystallinity, with a maximum peak for both cellulose and CNCs at 22°. The thermal stability of cellulose was lower than that of CNCs, where the latter showed thermal stability ranging between 110-250 °C. Overall, the cellulose and CNCs obtained showed good crystallinity and thermal stability. The particle size of the CNCs was recorded to be 253.2 nm. Also, they have a large surface area to volume ratio, which contributes to their high strength and stiffness. Thus, the cellulose and CNCs produced from decaying seagrass impart economic value to waste biomass, which can be a step towards the implementation of the wealth from the waste concept."
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 L. Pfeifer and B. Classen, Front. Plant Sci., 11, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.58875410.3389/fpls.2020.588754 ↗
2. 2 L. Pfeifer, Polymers (Basel), 13, 4285 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1324428510.3390/polym13244285 ↗
3. 3 S. Singh, K. K. Gaikwad, S. Il Park and Y. S. Lee, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 99, 506 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.00410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.004 ↗
4. 4 H. Xie, H. Du, X. Yang and C. Si, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2018, 7923068 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/792306810.1155/2018/7923068 ↗
5. 5 M. Szymanska-Chargot, M. Chylinska, K. Gdula, A. Koziol and A. Zdunek, Polymers (Basel), 9, 495 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym910049510.3390/polym9100495 ↗
6. 6 N. Rehman, S. Alam, N. U. Amin, I. Mian and H. Ullah, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2018, 8381501 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/838150110.1155/2018/8381501 ↗
7. 7 K. Bogolitsyn, A. Parshina and L. Aleshina, Cellulose, 27, 9787 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03485-z10.1007/s10570-020-03485-z ↗
8. 8 N. Sai Prasanna and J. Mitra, Carbohyd. Polym., 247, 116706 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11670610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116706 ↗
9. 9 M. Martelli-Tosi, M. D. S. Torricillas, M. A. Martins, O. B. G. De Assis and D. R. Tapia-Blácido, J. Nanomater., 2016, 8106814 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/810681410.1155/2016/8106814 ↗
10. 10 N. O. Okamoto-Schalch, S. G. B. Pinho, T. T. de Barros-Alexandrino, G. C. Dacanal, O. B. G. Assis et al., Cellulose, 27, 5855 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03173-y10.1007/s10570-020-03173-y ↗
11. 11 W. Chen, F. Chen, G. Zhang, X. Liu, S. Kong et al., Cellulose, 26, 7027 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02620-910.1007/s10570-019-02620-9 ↗
12. 12 U. P. Agarwal, R. S. Reiner, S. A. Ralph, J. Catchmark, K. Chi et al., Cellulose, 28, 1369 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03590-z10.1007/s10570-020-03590-z ↗
13. 13 R. A. Ilyas, S. M. Sapuan, M. R. Ishak and E. S. Zainudin, Carbohyd. Polym., 202, 186 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.002 ↗
14. 14 G. Mondragon, S. Fernandes, A. Retegi, C. Peña, I. Algar et al., Ind. Crop. Prod., 55, 140 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.02.01410.1016/j.indcrop.2014.02.014 ↗
15. 15 A. Kaushik, M. Singh and G. Verma, Carbohyd. Polym., 82, 337 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.063 ↗
16. 16 A. Khenblouche, D. Bechki, M. Gouamid, K. Charradi, L. Segni et al., Polimeros, 29, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.0521810.1590/0104-1428.05218 ↗
17. 17 A. Moradbak, P. M. Tahir, A. Z. Mohamed, M. M. Abdi, R. L. Razalli et al., Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., 76, 1021 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1244-110.1007/s00107-017-1244-1 ↗
18. 18 Kusmono, R. F. Listyanda, M. W. Wildan and M. N. Ilman, Heliyon, 6, e05486 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e0548610.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05486 ↗
19. 19 R. Radakisnin, M. S. A. Majid, M. R. M. Jamir, M. Jawaid, M. T. H. Sultan et al., Materials (Basel), 13, 4125 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1318412510.3390/ma13184125 ↗
20. 20 T. Sultana, S. Sultana, H. P. Nur and M. W. Khan, J. Compos. Sci., 4, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs403008310.3390/jcs4030083 ↗
21. 21 C. P. Chang, I. C. Wang, K. J. Hung and Y. S. Perng, Taiwan J. For. Sci., 25, 251 (2010), https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.201009.0251
22. 22 Y. Zhao and J. Li, Cellulose, 21, 3427 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0348-610.1007/s10570-014-0348-6 ↗
23. 23 Q. Q. Wang, J. Y. Zhu, R. S. Reiner, S. P. Verrill, U. Baxa et al., Cellulose, 19, 2033 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9765-610.1007/s10570-012-9765-6 ↗
24. 24 M. El Achaby, N. El Miri, A. Aboulkas, M. Zahouily, E. Bilal et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 96, 340 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.04010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.040 ↗
25. 25 V. Hospodarova, E. Singovszka and N. Stevulova, Am. J. Anal. Chem., 9, 303 (2018), https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2018.9602310.4236/ajac.2018.96023 ↗
26. 26 C. Huang, N. Hao, S. Bhagia, M. Li, X. Meng et al., Materialia, 4, 237 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2018.09.00810.1016/j.mtla.2018.09.008 ↗
27. 27 P. L. Bhutiya, N. Misra, M. Abdul Rasheed and S. Zaheer Hasan, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 117, 435 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.21010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.210 ↗
28. 28 A. Ait Benhamou, Cellulose, 28, 4625 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03842-610.1007/s10570-021-03842-6 ↗
29. 29 E. Durmaz and S. Ateş, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 755 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.6310.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.63 ↗
30. 30 E. Hafemann, R. Battisti, D. Bresolin, C. Marangoni and R. A. F. Machado, Waste Biomass Valor., 11, 6595 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-00937-210.1007/s12649-020-00937-2 ↗
31. 31 K. Kavkler and A. Demšar, Spectrochim. Acta - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 78, 740 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2010.12.00610.1016/j.saa.2010.12.006 ↗
32. 32 K. Schenzel, S. Fischer and E. Brendler, Cellulose, 12, 223 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-004-3885-610.1007/s10570-004-3885-6 ↗
33. 33 U. P. Agarwal, in "Handbook of Nanocellulose and Cellulose Nanocomposites", edited by H. Kargarzadeh, I. Ahmad, S. Thomas and A. Dufresne, Wiley-VCH, 2017, vol. 1, p. 609, https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527689972.ch1810.1002/9783527689972.ch18 ↗
34. 34 U. P. Agarwal, R. Sabo, R. S. Reiner, C. M. Clemons and A. W. Rudie, Appl. Spectrosc., 66, 750 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1366/11-0656310.1366/11-06563 ↗
35. 35 W. Li, R. Wang and S. Liu, BioResources, 6, 4271 (2011), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.6.4.4271-428110.15376/biores.6.4.4271-4281 ↗
36. 36 Y. Nishiyama, J. Sugiyama, H. Chanzy and P. Langan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 14300 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja037055w10.1021/ja037055w ↗
37. 37 Q. Lu, L. Tang, F. Lin, S. Wang, Y. Chen et al., Cellulose, 21, 3497 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0376-210.1007/s10570-014-0376-2 ↗
38. 38 A. Adeniyi, D. Gonzalez-Ortiz, C. Pochat-Bohatier, O. Oyewo, B. Sithole et al., Alexandria Eng. J., 59, 4201 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.02510.1016/j.aej.2020.07.025 ↗
39. 39 C. Verma, M. Chhajed, P. Gupta, S. Roy and P. K. Maji, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 175, 242 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.03810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.038 ↗
40. 40 E. Abraham, B. Deepa, L. A. Pothan, M. Jacob, S. Thomas et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 86, 1468 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.03410.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034 ↗
41. 41 C. Trilokesh and K. B. Uppuluri, Sci. Rep., 9, 1 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53412-x10.1038/s41598-019-53412-x ↗
42. 42 F. Luzi, D. Puglia, F. Sarasini, J. Tirillò, G. Maffei et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 209, 328 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.04810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.048 ↗
43. 43 T. Gabriel, A. Belete, G. Hause, R. H. H. Neubert and T. Gebre-Mariam, J. Polym. Environ., 29, 2964 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02089-310.1007/s10924-021-02089-3 ↗
44. 44 A. García, J. Labidi, M. N. Belgacem and J. Bras, Cellulose, 24, 693 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1144-210.1007/s10570-016-1144-2 ↗
45. 45 N. Pandi, S. H. Sonawane and K. Anand Kishore, Ultrason. Sonochem., 70, 105353 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.10535310.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105353 ↗
46. 46 T. Fattahi Meyabadi, F. Dadashian, G. Mir Mohamad Sadeghi and H. Ebrahimi Zanjani Asl, Powder Technol., 261, 232 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.03910.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.039 ↗
47. 47 L. Xing, J. Gu, W. Zhang, D. Tu and C. Hu, Carbohyd. Polym., 192, 184 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.04210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.042 ↗
48. 48 J. Marett, A. Aning and E. J. Foster, Ind. Crop. Prod., 109, 869 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.03910.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.039 ↗
49. 49 A. L. S. Pereira, D. M. do Nascimento, M. de sá M. Souza Filho, J. P. S. Morais, N. F. Vasconcelos et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 112, 165 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.09010.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.090 ↗
50. "