journal article·2023-05-12Open access

Common Capacity Fade Mechanisms of Metal Foil Alloy Anodes with Different Compositions for Lithium Batteries

Congcheng Wang, Timothy Chen, Yuhgene Liu, Dae Hoon Kang, Diptarka Majumdar, Rajesh Gopalaswamy, Matthew T. McDowell

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Metal foils are attractive anode candidates for replacing graphite in lithium-ion batteries, since metal alloys feature high lithium storage capacity and their direct use as foils could avoid slurry coating during manufacturing. Aluminum foil is highly abundant and low-cost, but aluminum foil anodes have generally shown poor cyclability. Here, we fabricate aluminum alloy foils (aluminum–tin, aluminum–zinc, and aluminum–gallium) and examine their electrochemical behavior to understand how composition and microstructure influence cycling performance of metal foil anodes. We show that the addition of alloy components can increase the cycle life of aluminum foil anodes by up to a factor of 2, and both the composition and microstructure of foils influence the cycling capability. We find an approximate power-law dependence of cycle life on the extent of lithiation per cycle for most aluminum-based foils as well as other metal foil compositions, suggesting a common “electrochemical fatigue” degradation mechanism arising from internal porosity formation during alloying/dealloying that governs the behavior of a wide variety of metal foil-based anodes. This understanding, as well as the improved cyclability of the alloy foils, suggests possible pathways to enhance performance of foil anodes for lithium batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Novelis, Inc., Kennesaw, Georgia 30144, United States

Funding

Novelis · Alfred P. Sloan Foundation · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jz101542210.1021/jz1015422 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.020 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr500207g10.1021/cr500207g ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20130179510.1002/adma.201301795 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.240778310.1149/1.2407783 ↗
6. Kegelman, M. R. Voltaic Cells with Lithium-Aluminum Alloy Anode and Nonaqueous Solvent Electrolyte System. US Patent 3639174A, February 1, 1972.
7. 10.1016/S0022-0728(76)80298-710.1016/S0022-0728(76)80298-7 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.213309810.1149/1.2133098 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00522-X10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00522-X ↗
10. 10.1039/D0TA09762D10.1039/D0TA09762D ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.00910.1016/j.joule.2020.05.009 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0114510.1021/acsenergylett.1c01145 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20160421910.1002/adma.201604219 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-020-15452-010.1038/s41467-020-15452-0 ↗
15. 10.1002/batt.20220036310.1002/batt.202200363 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.11810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.118 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0011903jes10.1149/2.0011903jes ↗
18. 10.1149/1.275298510.1149/1.2752985 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl202088h10.1021/nl202088h ↗
20. 10.1002/cssc.20200202310.1002/cssc.202002023 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0084410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00844 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00510.1016/j.joule.2019.01.005 ↗
23. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0516810.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05168 ↗
24. Okamoto H. · 1990
25. 10.1038/nmat374110.1038/nmat3741 ↗
26. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0724210.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07242 ↗
27. 10.1016/0167-2738(86)90212-210.1016/0167-2738(86)90212-2 ↗
28. Bannantine J. A. · 1990