Preventing Salt Formation in Zero-Gap CO2 Electrolyzers by Quantifying Cation Accumulation
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) efficiently turns CO 2 into a feedstock. However, unfavorable steady-state concentrations of ions in the cathode compartment result in salt formation if unaddressed, which restricts the access of CO 2 and causes cell failure. Here, we systematically show the relationship between salt accumulation and four system parameters including cation species, anolyte concentration, membrane thickness, and operating temperature. To compare each metric, we quantified the cation accumulation rate at predefined operating times. Notably, we show that operating at temperatures above 50 °C with properly humidified CO 2 stream fully avoids salt formation. We further show that combining separate operating conditions is also highly effective, showing operation for >144 h with no measurable salt deposition at 200 mA/cm 2 . Collectively, our work systematically demonstrates that salt formation is a prevalent yet surmountable CO 2 RR challenge that can be overcome by elevated cell temperatures or switching to more soluble alkali cations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials for Energy Conversion and Storage (MECS), Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft 2629 HZ, The Netherlands
Funding
Topconsortium voor Kennis en Innovatie · HyET NoCarbon
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.coche.2023.10090210.1016/j.coche.2023.100902 ↗
2. 10.1039/D0EE03382K10.1039/D0EE03382K ↗
3. 10.1002/ange.20210181810.1002/ange.202101818 ↗
4. 10.1039/C2CS35360A10.1039/C2CS35360A ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0067410.1021/acs.accounts.1c00674 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.00510.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.005 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20230278910.1002/anie.202302789 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8EE03134G10.1039/C8EE03134G ↗
9. 10.1039/D0CS00230E10.1039/D0CS00230E ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.4c1132610.1021/jacs.4c11326 ↗
11. 10.1038/s44160-024-00568-810.1038/s44160-024-00568-8 ↗
12. 10.1002/ange.20240841210.1002/ange.202408412 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aay421710.1126/science.aay4217 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-021-00813-w10.1038/s41560-021-00813-w ↗
15. 10.1039/D2TA09966G10.1039/D2TA09966G ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c2199710.1021/acsami.0c21997 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0188510.1021/acsenergylett.2c01885 ↗
18. 10.1002/cssc.20190254710.1002/cssc.201902547 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.01.01310.1016/j.joule.2023.01.013 ↗
20. 10.1039/D2EE03725D10.1039/D2EE03725D ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0501815jes10.1149/2.0501815jes ↗
22. 10.1039/D3EY00224A10.1039/D3EY00224A ↗
23. 10.1039/D0EE02589E10.1039/D0EE02589E ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.05110.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.05310.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.053 ↗
26. Rumble J. R. · 2022
27. 10.1038/s41467-022-33694-y10.1038/s41467-022-33694-y ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.02.01410.1016/j.jcat.2022.02.014 ↗
29. 10.1002/cssc.20240101310.1002/cssc.202401013 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.joule.2024.02.02710.1016/j.joule.2024.02.027 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12215610.1016/j.memsci.2023.122156 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41929-021-00655-510.1038/s41929-021-00655-5 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.1c1017110.1021/jacs.1c10171 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10052210.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100522 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0063710.1021/acsenergylett.0c00637 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0210210.1021/acsapm.3c02102 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11775110.1016/j.memsci.2019.117751 ↗
38. Merck. Solubility Table of Compounds in Water at Temperature. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/NL/en/support/calculators-and-apps/solubility-table-compounds-water-temperature (accessed August 5, 2024).