journal article·2022-12-09

Efficient MOF-Catalyzed Ortho–Para Hydrogen Conversion for Practical Liquefaction and Energy Storage

Daniil M. Polyukhov, Nikita A. Kudriavykh, Sergey A. Gromilov, Alexey S. Kiryutin, Artem S. Poryvaev, Matvey V. Fedin

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 7· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Parahydrogen, being one of two nuclear spin isomers of molecular hydrogen, is required in a number of applications, including hydrogen liquefaction for energy storage and transportation. Obtaining pure parahydrogen is vital for these tasks, thus requiring approaches for efficient ortho–para (OP) hydrogen conversion. In this work, we for the first time demonstrate the extraordinary potential of metal–organic frameworks (MOF) as OP-conversion catalysts. In particular, the specific conversion rate constant of Ni-MOF-74 is found 145-fold higher than that of industrially used catalysts (e.g., hydrous ferric oxide), thus opening new horizons in hydrogen liquefaction and storage and, ultimately, in the broad use of hydrogen energy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Magnetism in coordination complexes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

International Tomography Center SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/460809a10.1038/460809a ↗
2. Naujokaitytė, G. Clean hydrogen: smoke screen or the future of energy? https://sciencebusiness.net/climate-news/news/clean-hydrogen-smoke-screen-or-future-energy (accessed 08/15/2022).
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0281610.1021/acsenergylett.1c02816 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0102410.1021/acsenergylett.2c01024 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-210.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2 ↗
6. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.13210.1038/nenergy.2017.132 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.110915710.1126/science.1109157 ↗
8. 10.1039/D2EE00099G10.1039/D2EE00099G ↗
9. 10.1002/ceat.20180034510.1002/ceat.201800345 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.116887710.1126/science.1168877 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.crci.2005.05.01010.1016/j.crci.2005.05.010 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja412994k10.1021/ja412994k ↗
13. 10.1039/C8CS00688A10.1039/C8CS00688A ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.10.03810.1016/j.mattod.2018.10.038 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0087410.1021/acsenergylett.9b00874 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0262510.1021/acsenergylett.9b02625 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00610.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.006 ↗
18. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0384310.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03843 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.10410.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.104 ↗
20. 10.1134/S207005041801011710.1134/S2070050418010117 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.10110.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.101 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.15310.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.153 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.11310.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.113 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.10430510.1103/PhysRevB.81.104305 ↗
25. 10.1017/S088571561200086310.1017/S0885715612000863 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja807023q10.1021/ja807023q ↗
27. 10.1039/D0TC00844C10.1039/D0TC00844C ↗
28. Landau L. D. · 2013 · 3
29. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2013.09.00110.1016/j.progsurf.2013.09.001 ↗
30. Atkins P. · 2010
31. Toth J. · 2001
32. 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00586-510.1016/S0926-860X(01)00586-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12335610.1016/j.cej.2019.123356 ↗
34. 10.1080/00268976.2013.79566610.1080/00268976.2013.795666 ↗