COMPARISON OF PROPERTIES OF CELLULOSE NANOMATERIALS OBTAINED FROM SUNFLOWER STALKS
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the usability of sunflower stalks, which is one of the most significant agricultural residues in Turkey, in the production of cellulose nanomaterials (CNMs). Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were produced by using a grinding method and acid hydrolysis, respectively. The average width and length of CNCs were found as 13.91 ± 3.09 nm and 60.44 ± 21.06 nm, respectively. Besides, the average width of CNFs was determined as 15.03 ± 3.68 nm. The crystallinity index of CNFs and CNCs was determined as 82.64% and 83.09%, respectively. Although the main thermal degradation stage of CNCs started at higher temperature than that of CNFs, the latter were more stable than CNCs at high temperatures. Furthermore, the chemical bonds in the raw material, bleached fiber, CNCs and CNFs were investigated with FTIR analysis. Consequently, it was seen that sunflower stalks can be a suitable raw material for the production of CNMs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kastamonu University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Industrial Engineering, 37150, Kastamonu, Turkey
References (91)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 M. Jonoobi, R. Oladi, Y. Davoudpour, K. Oksman, A. Dufresne et al., Cellulose, 22, 935 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0551-010.1007/s10570-015-0551-0 ↗
2. 2 S. Mansouri, R. Khiari, F. Bettaieb, A. A. El-Gendy and F. Mhenni, J. Polym. Environ., 23, 190 (2015), https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10924-014-0691-610.1007/s10924-014-0691-6 ↗
3. 3 N. Olaru, L. Olaru, A. Stoleriu and D. Timpu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 67, 481 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980118)67:3<481::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19980118)67:3<481::aid-app11>3.0.co;2-z ↗
4. 4 R. Khiari, E. Mauret, M. N. Belgacem and F. Mhemmi, BioResources, 6, 265 (2011)10.15376/biores.6.1.265-281 ↗
5. 5 F. Kallel, F. Bettaieb, R. Khiari, A. García, J. Bras et al., Ind. Crop. Prod., 87, 287 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.06010.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.060 ↗
6. 6 D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H.-P. Fink and A. Bohn, Angew. Chem. Int., 44, 3358 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
7. 7 C. Yan, J. Wang, W. Kang, M. Cui, X. Wang et al., Adv. Mater., 26, 2022 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130474210.1002/adma.201304742 ↗
8. 8 N. Lin and A. Dufresne, Eur. Polym. J., 59, 302 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.02510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025 ↗
9. 9 Z. Shi, X. Gao, M. W. Ullah, S. Li, Q. Wang et al., Biomaterials, 111, 40 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.020 ↗
10. 10 M. Ul-Islam, M. W. Ullah, S. Khan, T. Kamal, S. Ul-Islam et al., Recent Pat. Nanotechnol., 10, 169 (2016), https://doi.org/10.2174/187221051066616042914491610.2174/1872210510666160429144916 ↗
11. 11 A. Jasim, M. W. Ullah, Z. Shi, X. Lin and G. Yang, Carbohyd. Polym., 163, 62 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.056 ↗
12. 12 W. Czaja, A. Krystynowicz, S. Bielecki and R. M. Brown, Biomaterials, 27, 145 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.03510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.035 ↗
13. 13 R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen and J. Youngblood, Chem. Soc. Rev., 40, 3941 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108B10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
14. 14 N. Shah, M. Ul-Islam, W. A. Khattak and J. K. Park, Carbohyd. Polym., 98, 1585 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.01810.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.018 ↗
15. 15 ISO/TS 20477. Nanotechnologies – Standard terms and their definition for cellulose nanomaterial (2017), https://www.iso.org/standard/68153.html10.3403/30323185u ↗
16. 16 S. H. Osong, S. Norgren and P. Engstrand, Cellulose, 23, 93 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0798-510.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 ↗
17. 17 K. Kekäläinen, H. Liimatainen and J. Niinimäki, Cellulose, 21, 3691 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0363-710.1007/s10570-014-0363-7 ↗
18. 18 K. Kekäläinen, H. Liimatainen, M. Illikainen, T. C. Maloney and J. Niinimäki, Cellulose, 21, 1163 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0210-x10.1007/s10570-014-0210-x ↗
19. 19 K. Uetani and H. Yano, Biomacromolecules, 12, 348 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101103p10.1021/bm101103p ↗
20. 20 L. Wågberg, G. Decher, M. Norgren, T. Lindström, M. Ankerfors et al., Langmuir, 24, 784 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1021/la702481v10.1021/la702481v ↗
21. 21 M. Henriksson, G. Henriksson, L. A. Berglund and T. Lindström, Eur. Polym. J., 43, 3434 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 ↗
22. 22 M. A. Hubbe, O. J. Rojas, L. A. Lucia and M. Sain, BioResources, 3, 929 (2008)
23. 23 A. García, A. Gandini, J. Labidi, N. Belgacem and J. Bras, Ind. Crop. Prod., 93, 26 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.00410.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.004 ↗
24. 24 J. Huang, X. Ma, G. Yang and A. Dufresne, in “Nanocellulose: From Fundamentals to Advanced Materials”, edited by J. Huang, A. Dufresne and N. Lin, Wiley-WCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2019, pp. 1-1510.1002/9783527807437.ch1 ↗
25. 25 A. Demirel, Master’s Thesis, Ahi Evran University, Institute of Science, Kırşehir, 2004
26. 26 V. Marechal and L. Rigal, Ind. Crop. Prod., 10, 185 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00023-010.1016/S0926-6690(99)00023-0 ↗
27. 27 TAPPI Test Method T257, Sampling and preparing wood for analysis, (2014), https://www.techstreet.com/standards/tappi-t257-sp-14?product_id=1877258
28. 28 TAPPI Test Method T204, Solvent extractives of wood and pulp, (2007), https://www.tappi.org/content/sarg/t204.pdf
29. 29 L. E. Wise, M. Murphy and A. A. D’Adieco, Pap. Trade J., 122, 35 (1946)
30. 30 TAPPI Test Method T203, Alpha-, beta- and gamma-cellulose in pulp, (2009), https://imisrise.tappi.org/TAPPI/Products/01/T/0104T203.aspx
31. 31 TAPPI Test Method T222, Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp, (2002), https://imisrise.tappi.org/TAPPI/Products/01/T/0104T222.aspx
32. 32 TAPPI Test Method T211, Ash in wood, pulp, paper and paperboard: combustion at 525°C, (2007), https://www.tappi.org/content/sarg/t211.pdf
33. 33 TAPPI Test Method T207, Water solubility of wood and pulp, (2008), https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/Standards/TAPPI-T-207-2008-1062596_SAIG_TAPPI_TAPPI_2471555/
34. 34 TAPPI Test Method T212, One percent sodium hydroxide solubility of wood and pulp, (2012), https://imisrise.tappi.org/TAPPI/Products/01/T/0104T212.aspx
35. 35 S. Mahesh, P. Kumar and S. A. Ansari, Trop. Plant Res., 2, 108 (2015)
36. 36 F. Gu, W. Wang, Z. Cai, F. Xue, Y. Jin et al., Cellulose, 25, 2861 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1765-810.1007/s10570-018-1765-8 ↗
37. 37 TAPPI Test Method T248, Laboratory beating of pulp (PFI mill method), (2015), https://imisrise.tappi.org/TAPPI/Products/01/T/0104T248.aspx
38. 38 TAPPI Test Method T227, Freeness of Pulp (Canadian Standard Method), (2017), https://imisrise.tappi.org/TAPPI/Products/01/T/0104T227.aspx
39. 39 V. F. Korolovych, V. Cherpak, D. Nepal, A. Ng, N. R. Shaikh et al., Polymer, 145, 334 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.06410.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.064 ↗
40. 40 K. Kriechbaum, P. Munier, V. Apostolopoulou-Kalkavoura and N. Lavoine, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 6, 11959 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0227810.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02278 ↗
41. 41 X. M. Dong, J. F. Revol and D. G. Gray, Cellulose, 5, 19 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100926051193910.1023/A:1009260511939 ↗
42. 42 N. Reddy and Y. Yang, Polymer, 46, 5494 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.07310.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.073 ↗
43. 43 S. Ateş, İ. Deniz, H. Kırcı, C. Atik and O. T. Okan, Turk. J. Agric. For., 39, 144 (2015), https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1403-4110.3906/tar-1403-41 ↗
44. 44 Ş. Bostancı, Thesis of Associate Professor, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, Trabzon (1980)
45. 45 J. Desmaisons, E. Boutonnet, M. Rueff, A. Dufresne and J. Bras, Carbohyd. Polym., 174, 318 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.03210.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.032 ↗
46. 46 K. Pacaphol, K. Seraypheap and D. Aht-Ong, Carbohyd. Polym., 224, 115167 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11516710.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115167 ↗
47. 47 M. El Achaby, Z. Kassab, A. Aboulkas, C. Gaillard and A. Barakat, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 106, 681 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.06710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.067 ↗
48. 48 M. El Achaby, N. El Miri, H. Hannache, S. Gmouh, H. Ben Youcef et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 117, 592 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.20110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.201 ↗
49. 49 M. El Achaby, Z. Kassab, A. Barakat and A. Aboulkas, Ind. Crop. Prod., 112, 499 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.04910.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.049 ↗
50. 50 K. Oh, S. Kwon, W. Xu, X. Wang and M. Toivakka, Cellulose, 27, 5003 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(98)00206-710.1007/s10570-020-03121-w ↗
51. 51 S. Josset, P. Orsolini, G. Siqueria, A. Tejado, P. Tingaut et al., Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., 29, 167 (2014)10.3183/npprj-2014-29-01-p167-175 ↗
52. 52 R. A. Ilyas, S. M. Sapuan, M. R. Ishak and E. S. Zainudin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 123, 379 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.12410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.124 ↗
53. 53 P. L. M. Ribeiro, T. V. B. Figueiredo, L. E. Moura and J. I. Druzian, Polym. Adv. Technol., 30, 573 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.449410.1002/pat.4494 ↗
54. 54 J. H. Jordan, M. W. Easson, B. Dien, S. Thompson and B. D. Condon, Cellulose, 26, 5959 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02533-710.1007/s10570-019-02533-7 ↗
55. 55 L. Chen, Q. Wang, K. Hirth, C. Baez, U. P. Agarwal et al., Cellulose, 22, 1753 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0615-110.1007/s10570-015-0615-1 ↗
56. 56 N. Lin and A. Dufresne, Nanoscale, 6, 5384 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR06761K10.1039/C3NR06761K ↗
57. 57 T. Sucharitpong, N. T. Lam and P. Sukyai, Sugar Tech, 22, 328 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00775-010.1007/s12355-019-00775-0 ↗
58. 58 M. Thakur, A. Sharma, V. Ahlawat, M. Bhattacharya and S. Goswami, Mater. Sci. Technol., 3, 328 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.12.00510.1016/j.mset.2019.12.005 ↗
59. 59 F. Debiagi, P. C. S. Faria-Tischer and S. Mali, Cellulose, 27, 1975 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02893-010.1007/s10570-019-02893-0 ↗
60. 60 N. P. Marinho, P. H. G. de Cademartori, S. Nisgoski, V. O. de Andrade Tanobe, U. Klock et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 230, 115579 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11557910.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115579 ↗
61. 61 P. Krishnadev, K. S. Subramanian, G. J. Janavi, S. Ganapathy and A. Lakshmanan, BioResources, 15, 2442 (2020)10.15376/biores.15.2.2442-2458 ↗
62. 62 A. Ramakrishnan, K. Ravishankar and R. Dhamodharan, Cellulose, 26, 3127 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02312-410.1007/s10570-019-02312-4 ↗
63. 63 J. Yan, J. Hu, R. Yang, Z. Zhang and W. Zhao, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 6, 3481 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0376510.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03765 ↗
64. 64 A. K. Bharimalla, P. G. Patil, S. P. Deshmukh and N. Vigneshwaran, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 51, 395 (2017), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT5-6(2017)/p.395-401.pdf
65. 65 A. V. Istomin, T. S. Demina, E. N. Subcheva, T. A. Akopova and A. N. Zelenetskii, Fibre Chem., 48, 199 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10692-016-9767-510.1007/s10692-016-9767-5 ↗
66. 66 T. Zhong, R. Dhandapani, D. Liang, J. Wang, M. P. Wolcott et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 240, 116283 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11628310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116283 ↗
67. 67 L. K. Kian, N. Saba, M. Jawaid, O. Y. Alothman and H. Fouad, Carbohyd. Polym., 241, 116423 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11642310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116423 ↗
68. 68 M. Salari, M. S. Khiabani, R. R. Mokarram, B. Ghanbarzadeh and H. S. Kafil, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 122, 280 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.13610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.136 ↗
69. 69 B. H. Patel and P. V. Joshi, J. Package Technol. Res., 4, 95 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-020-00083-z10.1007/s41783-020-00083-z ↗
70. 70 M. A. F. Supian, K. N. M. Amin, S. S. Jamari and S. Mohamad, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 103024 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.10302410.1016/j.jece.2019.103024 ↗
71. 71 F. Hemmati, S. M. Jafari and R. A. Taheri, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 137, 374 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.24110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.241 ↗
72. 72 E. Kamelnia, A. Divsalar, M. Darroudi, P. Yaghmaei and K. Sadri, Ind. Crop. Prod., 139, 111538 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11153810.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111538 ↗
73. 73 D. Ahuja, A. Kaushik and M. Singh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 107, 1294 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.10710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.107 ↗
74. 74 X. Miao, J. Lin, F. Tian, X. Li, F. Bian et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 136, 841 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.056 ↗
75. 75 Z. Wang, Z. Yao, J. Zhou and Y. Zhang, Carbohyd. Polym., 157, 945 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.04410.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.044 ↗
76. 76 S. Maiti, J. Jayaramudu, K. Das, S. M. Reddy, R. Sadiku et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 98, 562 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.02910.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.029 ↗
77. 77 Z. Jahan, M. B. K. Niazi and Ø. W. Gregersen, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 57, 113 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.01410.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.014 ↗
78. 78 S. Kyle, Z. M. Jessop, A. Al-Sabah, K. Hawkins, A. Lewis et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 198, 270 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.09110.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.091 ↗
79. 79 M. L. Foo, K. W. Tan, T. Y. Wu, E. S. Chan and I. M. L. Chew, Chem. Eng. Trans., 60, 97 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1760017
80. 80 K. Xu, C. Liu, K. Kang, Z. Zheng, S. Wang et al., Compos. Sci. Technol., 154, 8 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.022 ↗
81. 81 R. A. Ilyas, S. M. Sapuan and M. R. Ishak, Carbohyd. Polym., 181, 1038 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.04510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.045 ↗
82. 82 H. Khanjanzadeh, R. Behrooz, N. Bahramifar, W. Gindl-Altmutter, M. Bacher et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 106, 1288 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.13610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.060 ↗
83. 83 M. Jonoobi, J. Harun, A. Shakeri, M. Misra and K. Oksman, BioResources, 4, 626 (2009)10.15376/biores.4.2.626-639 ↗
84. 84 Y. Tang, X. Zhang, R. Zhao, D. Guo and J. Zhang, Carbohyd. Polym., 197, 128 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.073 ↗
85. 85 J. Lamaming, R. Hashim, O. Sulaiman, C. P. Leh, T. Sugimoto et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 127, 202 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.043 ↗
86. 86 A. Kumar, Y. S. Negi, V. Choudhary and N. K. Bhardwaj, JMPC, 2, 1 (2014), https://doi.org/10.12691/jmpc-2-1-110.12691/jmpc-2-1-1 ↗
87. 87 Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, R. Li, X. Ren and T. S. Huang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 136, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4710110.1002/app.47101 ↗
88. 88 E. Hafemann, R. Battisti, D. Bresolin, C. Marangoni and R. A. F. Machado, Waste Biomass Valor., 11, 6595 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-00937-210.1007/s12649-020-00937-2 ↗
89. 89 K. Song, X. Zhu, W. Zhu and X. Li, Bioresour. Bioprocess., 6, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-019-0279-z10.1186/s40643-019-0279-z ↗
90. 90 F. I. Ditzel, E. Prestes, B. M. Carvalho, I. M. Demiate and L. A. Pinheiro, Carbohyd. Polym., 157, 1577 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.03610.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.036 ↗
91. 91 E. Fortunati, D. Puglia, M. Monti, L. Peponi, C. Santulli et al., J. Polym. Environ., 21, 319 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0543-110.1007/s10924-012-0543-1 ↗