journal article·2021-05-14Open access

Improved Li+ Transport in Polyacetal Electrolytes: Conductivity and Current Fraction in a Series of Polymers

Rachel L. Snyder, Youngwoo Choo, Kevin W. Gao, David M. Halat, Brooks A. Abel, Siddharth Sundararaman, David Prendergast, Jeffrey A. Reimer, Nitash P. Balsara, Geoffrey W. Coates

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 6· Issue 5

Abstract

Polymer electrolytes mitigate safety concerns surrounding flammable liquid electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries. Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) electrolytes demonstrate viable conductivity values (∼1 × 10–3 S/cm) at elevated temperatures (>70 °C) but a relatively low Li+ current fraction (≤0.2) because strong Li+ coordination inhibits cation mobility. We have developed a series of polyacetal electrolytes by systematically varying methylene oxide (MO) and ethylene oxide (EO) units in the polymer backbone. These materials maintain high oxygen-to-carbon ratios like PEO but offer improved ion transport, revealing trends of decreasing conductivity and increasing current fraction with respect to polymer composition. In particular, the increasing current fraction measured via the Bruce–Vincent method suggests that MO units improve Li+ mobility relative to anion mobility. We calculate an overall efficacy (product of conductivity and current fraction) for each polymer/salt composition and identify two polymers—P(EO-MO) and P(EO-2MO)—that outperform PEO at high and low salt concentrations, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States

Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

The Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · National Science Foundation

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja309143810.1021/ja3091438 ↗
2. 10.1073/pnas.182167211710.1073/pnas.1821672117 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr030203g10.1021/cr030203g ↗
4. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.10122010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101220 ↗
5. 10.1039/C6CS00491A10.1039/C6CS00491A ↗
6. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.10310.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 ↗
7. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
8. 10.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-810.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-8 ↗
9. 10.1557/mrs2000.1610.1557/mrs2000.16 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.1990002060310.1002/adma.19900020603 ↗
11. 10.1039/C9ME00038K10.1039/C9ME00038K ↗
12. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c0078810.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00788 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma052277v10.1021/ma052277v ↗
14. 10.1021/acscentsci.5b0019510.1021/acscentsci.5b00195 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00744-110.1016/S0013-4686(00)00744-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/0013-4686(92)80117-510.1016/0013-4686(92)80117-5 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0045010.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00450 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41560-019-0349-710.1038/s41560-019-0349-7 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0282310.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02823 ↗
20. 10.1126/sciadv.aat538310.1126/sciadv.aat5383 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0270610.1021/acs.macromol.7b02706 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0015910.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00159 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.09.02110.1016/j.ssi.2011.09.021 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.02010.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.020 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b0031710.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00317 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0059410.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00594 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.510968410.1063/1.5109684 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.004 ↗