journal article·2021-09-10Open access

Potentiometric MRI of a Superconcentrated Lithium Electrolyte: Testing the Irreversible Thermodynamics Approach

Andrew A. Wang, Anna B. Gunnarsdóttir, Jack Fawdon, Mauro Pasta, Clare P. Grey, Charles W. Monroe

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 6· Issue 9

Abstract

:EMC responds to galvanostatic polarization and open-circuit relaxation. We simulate this experiment using an independently parametrized model with six composition-dependent electrolyte properties, quantified up to saturation. Spectroscopy reveals increasing ion association and solvent coordination with salt concentration. The potentiometric MRI data agree closely with the predicted ion distributions and overpotentials, providing a completely independent validation of the theory. Superconcentrated electrolytes exhibit strong cation-anion interactions and extreme solute-volume effects that mimic elevated lithium transference. Our simulations allow surface overpotentials to be extracted from cell-voltage data to track lithium interfaces. Potentiometric MRI is a powerful tool to illuminate electrolytic transport phenomena.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, U.K.

The Faraday Institution, Harwell Campus, Didcot OX11 0RA, U.K.

Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.

Department of Materials Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · H2020 European Research Council

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.01.01110.1016/j.trechm.2020.01.011 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.00910.1016/j.joule.2019.12.009 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr030203g10.1021/cr030203g ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.00710.1016/j.joule.2019.12.007 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22969010.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229690 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0461614jes10.1149/2.0461614jes ↗
7. 10.1149/1.139251210.1149/1.1392512 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.003 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.5b0938510.1021/jacs.5b09385 ↗
10. 10.1039/D0TA05652A10.1039/D0TA05652A ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.0c1025810.1021/jacs.0c10258 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41560-021-00787-910.1038/s41560-021-00787-9 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-020-0668-810.1038/s41560-020-0668-8 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.1251904jes10.1149/2.1251904jes ↗
15. 10.1149/2.033311jes10.1149/2.033311jes ↗
16. 10.1149/2.1081706jes10.1149/2.1081706jes ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11414510.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114145 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.0291902jes10.1149/2.0291902jes ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms251310.1038/ncomms2513 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20200128510.1002/adfm.202001285 ↗
21. 10.1063/5.000619710.1063/5.0006197 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0211810.1021/acsenergylett.9b02118 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.03110.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.031 ↗
24. 10.1149/1945-7111/abdddf10.1149/1945-7111/abdddf ↗
25. 10.1088/1674-1056/25/1/01610110.1088/1674-1056/25/1/016101 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8CP06214E10.1039/C8CP06214E ↗
27. 10.1002/cphc.20200015310.1002/cphc.202000153 ↗
28. Newman J. · 2004
29. 10.1149/2.0451608jes10.1149/2.0451608jes ↗
30. Richardson G. W. · arXiv [physics.chem-ph] · 2020 · 2002.00806
31. Darken L. S. · Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. · 1948 · 175 · 184
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13763810.1016/j.electacta.2020.137638 ↗
33. 10.1002/aic.69019022010.1002/aic.690190220 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.00610.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.006 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.00910.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13668810.1016/j.electacta.2020.136688 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13508510.1016/j.electacta.2019.135085 ↗
38. 10.1149/2.0961507jes10.1149/2.0961507jes ↗
39. 10.1149/2.0641503jes10.1149/2.0641503jes ↗
40. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.02.02510.1016/j.elecom.2016.02.025 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.04.02310.1016/j.electacta.2008.04.023 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.0571912jes10.1149/2.0571912jes ↗
43. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac099410.1149/1945-7111/ac0994 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.00910.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.009 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.coelec.2017.09.01010.1016/j.coelec.2017.09.010 ↗
46. 10.1149/1.240824910.1149/1.2408249 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja305461j10.1021/ja305461j ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-021-24297-010.1038/s41467-021-24297-0 ↗
49. 10.1021/jacs.7b1335710.1021/jacs.7b13357 ↗
50. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc0c910.1149/1945-7111/abc0c9 ↗
51. 10.1002/jcc.2575910.1002/jcc.25759 ↗
52. 10.1021/jacs.6b0422610.1021/jacs.6b04226 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0721810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07218 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0430010.1021/acs.jpcb.5b04300 ↗
55. 10.1149/2.0981809jes10.1149/2.0981809jes ↗
56. 10.1149/2.0921908jes10.1149/2.0921908jes ↗
57. 10.1149/1.204420610.1149/1.2044206 ↗
58. 10.1021/jp000142f10.1021/jp000142f ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0603510.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06035 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0082610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00826 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.09910.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.099 ↗
62. 10.1039/C6CP07215A10.1039/C6CP07215A ↗
63. 10.1139/v75-19110.1139/v75-191 ↗
64. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc43710.1149/1945-7111/abc437 ↗
65. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0369410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03694 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0211810.1021/acsenergylett.9b02118 ↗
67. 10.1149/2.022310jes10.1149/2.022310jes ↗
68. 10.1016/0167-2738(88)90304-910.1016/0167-2738(88)90304-9 ↗
69. 10.1149/2.0651514jes10.1149/2.0651514jes ↗
70. Robinson R. A. · 2012
71. 10.1039/C4CP05021E10.1039/C4CP05021E ↗
72. 10.5281/zenodo.476788310.5281/zenodo.4767883 ↗
73. 10.1149/2.0281914jes10.1149/2.0281914jes ↗
74. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.10410.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.104 ↗
75. 10.1149/1.280137810.1149/1.2801378 ↗
76. 10.1149/1.209645110.1149/1.2096451 ↗
77. 10.1149/2.1131704jes10.1149/2.1131704jes ↗
78. 10.1021/acscentsci.6b0026010.1021/acscentsci.6b00260 ↗
79. 10.1039/C7TA00371D10.1039/C7TA00371D ↗
80. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0200310.1021/acsenergylett.8b02003 ↗
81. 10.1073/pnas.160790311310.1073/pnas.1607903113 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.06.01310.1016/j.jmr.2014.06.013 ↗
83. 10.1002/jmri.2153210.1002/jmri.21532 ↗
84. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc0c910.1149/1945-7111/abc0c9 ↗
85. 10.1149/1.290452610.1149/1.2904526 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.02.00610.1016/j.coche.2016.02.006 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13586210.1016/j.electacta.2020.135862 ↗
88. 10.1149/1.160668610.1149/1.1606686 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.001 ↗
90. 10.1002/advs.20200330110.1002/advs.202003301 ↗
91. As discussed earlier by the authors, the superconcentrated LiPF6:EMC electrolyte studied here should be amenable to description by eqs 1 and 2, so long as all local association/dissociation reactions reach equilibrium on a time scale much faster than the characteristic time scale for diffusion.(36,55)