Electrochemical Pumping for Challenging Hydrogen Separations
Source abstract
Abstract
Conventional hydrogen separations from reformed hydrocarbons often deploy a water gas shift (WGS) reactor to convert CO to CO2, followed by adsorption processes to achieve pure hydrogen. The purified hydrogen is then fed to a compressor to deliver hydrogen at high pressures. Electrochemical hydrogen pumps (EHPs) featuring proton-selective polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) represent an alternative separation platform with fewer unit operations because they can simultaneously separate and compress hydrogen continuously. In this work, a high-temperature PEM (HT-PEM) EHP purified hydrogen to 99.3%, with greater than 85% hydrogen recovery for feed mixtures containing 25-40% CO. The ion-pair HT-PEM and phosphonic acid ionomer binder enabled the EHP to be operated in the temperature range from 160 to 220 °C. The ability to operate the EHP at an elevated temperature allowed the EHP to purify hydrogen from gas feeds with large CO contents at 1 A cm-2. Finally, the EHP with the said materials displayed a small performance loss of 12 μV h-1for purifying hydrogen from syngas for 100 h at 200 °C.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, United States
Chemistry and Nanoscience Research Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 160802, United States
Funding
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy · Universidad de Costa Rica
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/550026a10.1038/550026a ↗
2. 10.1002/9781118984123.ch910.1002/9781118984123.ch9 ↗
3. McGrath, G. Electric power sector CO2 emissions drop as generation mix shifts from coal to natural gas. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2021. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=48296 (accessed 2021-09-16).
4. FACT SHEET: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies. The White House, 2021. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/22/fact-sheet-president-biden-sets-2030-greenhouse-gas-pollution-reduction-target-aimed-at-creating-good-paying-union-jobs-and-securing-u-s-leadership-on-clean-energy-technologies/ (accessed 2021-09-16).
5. FACT SHEET: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies. The White House, 2021. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/22/fact-sheet-president-biden-sets-2030-greenhouse-gas-pollution-reduction-target-aimed-at-creating-good-paying-union-jobs-and-securing-u-s-leadership-on-clean-energy-technologies/ (accessed 2021-09-16).
6. 10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z ↗
7. Hydrogen Production: Natural Gas Reforming. energy.gov. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-natural-gas-reforming (accessed 2021-09-16).
8. 10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00112-210.1016/S0360-3199(97)00112-2 ↗
9. 10.3390/catal1103039310.3390/catal11030393 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12387210.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123872 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.20110.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.201 ↗
12. 10.1081/SS-10010018310.1081/SS-100100183 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cep.2017.07.02110.1016/j.cep.2017.07.021 ↗
14. Fishel K. · 2016 · 52710.1007/978-3-319-17082-4_24 ↗
15. Maget, H. J. R. Process for gas purification. US 3489670 A, 1964.
16. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.12010.1038/nenergy.2016.120 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11873410.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118734 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22847610.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228476 ↗
19. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab81a010.1149/1945-7111/ab81a0 ↗
20. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0703710.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07037 ↗
21. 10.1039/C9TA01756A10.1039/C9TA01756A ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0180210.1021/acsaem.9b01802 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41563-020-00841-z10.1038/s41563-020-00841-z ↗
24. 10.1038/s41560-021-00971-x10.1038/s41560-021-00971-x ↗
25. 10.1039/D1MA00208B10.1039/D1MA00208B ↗
26. 10.1039/C7EE03595K10.1039/C7EE03595K ↗
27. 10.1007/s10800-011-0341-910.1007/s10800-011-0341-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jngse.2010.10.00210.1016/j.jngse.2010.10.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.16710.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.167 ↗
30. Allam, R. J.; Chiang, R.; Hufton, J. R.; Middleton, P.; Weist, E. L.; White, V. Development of the Sorption Enhanced Water Gas Shift Process. In Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations, Vol. 1; Thomas, D. C., Benson, S. M., Eds. Elsevier Science, 2005; pp 227–256.10.1016/B978-008044570-0/50099-4 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.09310.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.093 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.01310.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.013 ↗
33. 10.1002/aic.1188610.1002/aic.11886 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10450-008-9133-x10.1007/s10450-008-9133-x ↗
35. 10.1007/s10450-013-9598-010.1007/s10450-013-9598-0 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.09310.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.093 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11581-007-0080-410.1007/s11581-007-0080-4 ↗