journal article·2023-12-08Open access

Impact of Dopants on Suppressing Gas Evolution from High-Nickel Layered Oxide Cathodes

Richard Sim, Zehao Cui, Arumugam Manthiram

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 8· Issue 12

Abstract

Gas release from high-Ni layered oxide cathodes (LiNi x Mn 1- x-y-z Co y Al z O 2; x > 0.8) can jeopardize the overall performance and safety characteristics of the cell. A comprehensive assessment of rational cathode design with common dopants, such as Ni, Co, Al, and Mn, to suppress gas evolution is crucial for battery safety, yet it remains to be conducted. Here, we present an in situ gas analysis of nine high-Ni cathode materials with online electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS). We show that, regardless of the dopant, reactive oxygen release from the cathode lattice remains a critical process for gas evolution. A series of comparisons reveals that the intensity and onset point of gas release are strongly dependent on the cathode composition. Notably, Al and Mn are the most effective dopants to suppress gas evolution from the cathode at 4.4 V. We further highlight lattice stability limits, across these nine compositions, between 85% and 93% state-of-charge.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Funding

Division of Graduate Education · Vehicle Technologies Office

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20180056110.1002/adma.201800561 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-019-0513-010.1038/s41560-019-0513-0 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0172710.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01727 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.8b1315810.1021/acsami.8b13158 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-021-24404-110.1038/s41467-021-24404-1 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b0176010.1021/acs.analchem.7b01760 ↗
7. 10.3389/fceng.2022.82837510.3389/fceng.2022.828375 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13750510.1016/j.electacta.2020.137505 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0045910.1021/acsaem.9b00459 ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.7b0846110.1021/jacs.7b08461 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.03710.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.037 ↗
12. 10.1149/2.0021707jes10.1149/2.0021707jes ↗
13. 10.1038/s41563-020-0767-810.1038/s41563-020-0767-8 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-020-00748-810.1038/s41560-020-00748-8 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0230310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02303 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20230724310.1002/anie.202307243 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20220013610.1002/aenm.202200136 ↗
18. 10.1002/smtd.20220143810.1002/smtd.202201438 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22934710.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229347 ↗
20. 10.1149/1945-7111/acf3a110.1149/1945-7111/acf3a1 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20220385310.1002/aenm.202203853 ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0401714jes10.1149/2.0401714jes ↗
23. 10.1149/2.1261811jes10.1149/2.1261811jes ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0192710.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01927 ↗
25. 10.1149/1945-7111/acbf8010.1149/1945-7111/acbf80 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0171410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01714 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.1001702jes10.1149/2.1001702jes ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b0807910.1021/acs.jpca.8b08079 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0144410.1021/acsenergylett.2c01444 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11822910.1016/j.actamat.2022.118229 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11581-018-2553-z10.1007/s11581-018-2553-z ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.03810.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.038 ↗
33. 10.1039/D1EE04053G10.1039/D1EE04053G ↗
34. 10.1038/s41467-020-15355-010.1038/s41467-020-15355-0 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.6b0451610.1021/acsami.6b04516 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.7b1359710.1021/acsami.7b13597 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.01510.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.015 ↗
38. 10.1039/C6CS00875E10.1039/C6CS00875E ↗
39. 10.1149/1945-7111/aceffd10.1149/1945-7111/aceffd ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20210242110.1002/aenm.202102421 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.1c0182410.1021/acsami.1c01824 ↗
42. 10.1039/c0jm00154f10.1039/c0jm00154f ↗