Machine-Learning-Driven Advanced Characterization of Battery Electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Materials characterization is fundamental to our understanding of lithium ion battery electrodes and their performance limitations. Advances in laboratory-based characterization techniques have yielded powerful insights into the structure–function relationship of electrodes, yet there is still far to go. Further improvements rely, in part, on gaining a deeper understanding of complex physical heterogeneities in the materials. However, practical limitations in characterization techniques inhibit our ability to combine data directly. For example, some characterization techniques are destructive, thus preventing additional analyses on the same region. Fortunately, artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential for achieving representative, 3D, multi-modal datasets by leveraging data collected from a range of techniques. In this Perspective, we give an overview of recent advances in lab-based characterization techniques for Li-ion electrodes. We then discuss how AI methods can combine and enhance these techniques, leading to substantial acceleration in our understanding of electrodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2DB, U.K.
Funding
Henry Royce Institute · U.S. Department of Energy · Faraday Institution
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41565-022-01081-910.1038/s41565-022-01081-9 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0010810.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108 ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20200390810.1002/aenm.202003908 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0EE01191F10.1039/D0EE01191F ↗
5. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac394110.1149/1945-7111/ac3941 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22728510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227285 ↗
7. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab6b1d10.1149/1945-7111/ab6b1d ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0051710.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00517 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.00710.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.063 ↗
11. 10.1149/1945-7111/abdc7110.1149/1945-7111/abdc71 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.04310.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.043 ↗
13. 10.1039/D1EE02898G10.1039/D1EE02898G ↗
14. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac33e510.1149/1945-7111/ac33e5 ↗
15. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac315710.1149/1945-7111/ac3157 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.9b0560210.1021/acsami.9b05602 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms1410110.1038/ncomms14101 ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms452910.1038/ncomms4529 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4EE01400F10.1039/C4EE01400F ↗
20. 10.1038/s41563-020-0767-810.1038/s41563-020-0767-8 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-021-24893-010.1038/s41467-021-24893-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15304810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153048 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41586-018-0397-310.1038/s41586-018-0397-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.01310.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.013 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0144310.1021/acsenergylett.2c01443 ↗
26. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac7a6810.1149/1945-7111/ac7a68 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10013710.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100137 ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms901410.1038/ncomms9014 ↗
29. 10.1039/D1TA10050E10.1039/D1TA10050E ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.007 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0097110.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00971 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10064710.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100647 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6CP04251A10.1039/C6CP04251A ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22914810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229148 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41598-017-04742-110.1038/s41598-017-04742-1 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0050910.1021/acsenergylett.1c00509 ↗
37. 10.1557/jmr.2011.4110.1557/jmr.2011.41 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41524-021-00567-910.1038/s41524-021-00567-9 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22910110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229101 ↗
40. Dahari A. · arXiv Preprint · 2021 · arXiv:2110.1128
41. 10.1038/s41524-020-0340-710.1038/s41524-020-0340-7 ↗
42. Squires I. · arXiv Preprint · 2022 · arXiv:2210.0699
43. 10.1038/s41524-022-00749-z10.1038/s41524-022-00749-z ↗
44. 10.1038/s42256-021-00322-110.1038/s42256-021-00322-1 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41563-020-00833-z10.1038/s41563-020-00833-z ↗
46. 10.1063/1.513532810.1063/1.5135328 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41524-021-00652-z10.1038/s41524-021-00652-z ↗
48. Ronneberger O. · 2015 · 234
49. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx18010.1093/bioinformatics/btx180 ↗
50. Gatys L. A. · 2016 · 2414
51. Yu J. · 2018 · 5505
52. 10.1109/TIP.2012.221882810.1109/TIP.2012.2218828 ↗
53. 10.1111/jmi.1296010.1111/jmi.12960 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11055110.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110551 ↗
55. 10.1039/D0NR04589F10.1039/D0NR04589F ↗
56. 10.1145/342262210.1145/3422622 ↗
57. Ho, J.; Jain, A.; Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020), Vancouver, Canada, 2020.
58. Karras T. · arXiv Preprint · 2018 · arXiv:1812.0494
59. Rombach R. · arXiv Preprint · 2021 · arXiv:2112.1075
60. Ledig C. · 2017 · 4681
61. 10.1186/s13634-019-0626-410.1186/s13634-019-0626-4 ↗
62. 10.1109/TKDE.2021.313019110.1109/TKDE.2021.3130191 ↗
63. Kench S. · arXiv Preprint · 2022 · arXiv:2210.0654
64. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22932010.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229320 ↗
66. 10.1149/1945-7111/abec5510.1149/1945-7111/abec55 ↗
67. Mirza M. · arXiv Preprint · 2014 · arXiv:1411.1784
68. 10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
69. 10.1002/batt.20220022410.1002/batt.202200224 ↗