journal article·2023-01-13

Overcoming the Interfacial Challenges of LiFePO 4 in Inorganic All-Solid-State Batteries

Ashley Cronk, Yu-Ting Chen, Grayson Deysher, So-Yeon Ham, Hedi Yang, Phillip Ridley, Baharak Sayahpour, Long Hoang Bao Nguyen, Jin An Sam Oh, Jihyun Jang, Darren H. S. Tan, Ying Shirley Meng

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 8· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) are one of the most promising systems to enable long-lasting and thermally resilient next-generation energy storage. Ideally, these systems should utilize low-cost resources with reduced reliance on critical materials. Pursuing cobalt- and nickel-free chemistries, like LiFePO 4 (LFP), is a promising strategy. Morphological features of LFP essential for improved electrochemical performance are highlighted to elucidate the interfacial challenges when implemented in ASSBs, since adoption in inorganic ASSBs has yet to be reported. In this work, the compatibility of LFP with two types of solid-state electrolytes, Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl) and Li 2 ZrCl 6 (LZC), are investigated. The potential existence of oxidative decomposition products is probed using a combination of structural, electrochemical, and spectroscopic analyses. Bulk and interfacial characterization reveal that the sulfide-based electrolyte LPSCl decomposes into insulative products, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is used to quantify the resulting impedance growth. However, through utilization of the chloride-based electrolyte LZC, high-rate and stable electrochemical performance is achieved at room temperature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States

Department of NanoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States

Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States

Funding

Division of Graduate Education · LG Energy Solution

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.00210.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 ↗
2. 10.3390/en1310263810.3390/en13102638 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.01910.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 ↗
4. Halm, I. Surging commodity prices could impact the growth of the EV sector. Mining Technology , 2022. https://www.mining-technology.com/analysis/commodity-prices-ev-sector-growth/. Accessed 2022-05-31.
5. 10.1002/aenm.20210202810.1002/aenm.202102028 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.183757110.1149/1.1837571 ↗
7. Coppola, G.; Baker, R.D. Tesla Shifting to Cheaper Battery Chemistry Tried in China. Bloomberg US Edition. 2021. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-20/tesla-shifting-to-cheaper-battery-chemistry-tried-in-china. Accessed 2022-06-05.
8. Kolodny, L. Rivian will follow Tesla and change the type of battery cells it uses in standard packs. CNBC 2022. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/10/rivian-changing-battery-cells-to-lfp-following-tesla-and-high-nickel.html. Accessed 2022-06-05.
9. BloombergNEF. Lithium-Ion Batteries: 2021 State of the Industry Analysis, Long-Term Energy Storage Outlook, Long-Term Electric Vehicle Outlook and 2020 Lithium-Ion Battery Price Survey. 2021. https://about.newenergyfinance.com/electric-vehicle-outlook/. Accessed 2022-06-05.
10. International Energy Agency. Global EV Outlook 2022: Securing supplies for an electric future. 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2022/. Accessed 2022-06-05.
11. 10.1039/D0NR03776A10.1039/D0NR03776A ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms916910.1038/ncomms9169 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.05.01310.1016/j.ensm.2017.05.013 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20150086510.1002/aenm.201500865 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1026810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10268 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20170443610.1002/adma.201704436 ↗
17. 10.1002/advs.20170099610.1002/advs.201700996 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.02.04010.1016/j.ssi.2018.02.040 ↗
19. 10.1073/pnas.190750711610.1073/pnas.1907507116 ↗
20. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9a0010.1149/1945-7111/ab9a00 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41586-021-03885-610.1038/s41586-021-03885-6 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0093510.1021/acsaem.0c00935 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41598-022-09244-310.1038/s41598-022-09244-3 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-022-29743-110.1038/s41467-022-29743-1 ↗
25. 10.1039/D2NR01143C10.1039/D2NR01143C ↗
26. 10.1039/D2TA00800A10.1039/D2TA00800A ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jascer.2013.03.00510.1016/j.jascer.2013.03.005 ↗
28. 10.1039/D0TA08472G10.1039/D0TA08472G ↗
29. 10.1039/D1TA09846B10.1039/D1TA09846B ↗
30. 10.3390/electrochem203003010.3390/electrochem2030030 ↗
31. 10.1149/1945-7111/abb8b310.1149/1945-7111/abb8b3 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0148710.1021/acsaem.1c01487 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20190062610.1002/aenm.201900626 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41598-019-44629-x10.1038/s41598-019-44629-x ↗
35. 10.1038/s41565-020-0657-x10.1038/s41565-020-0657-x ↗
36. 10.1039/C9EE03828K10.1039/C9EE03828K ↗
37. 10.1021/acsaem.7b0014010.1021/acsaem.7b00140 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20180307510.1002/adma.201803075 ↗
39. 10.1039/C9EE02311A10.1039/C9EE02311A ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20200319010.1002/aenm.202003190 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c0014210.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00142 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0259910.1021/acsenergylett.9b02599 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0267810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02678 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-021-24697-210.1038/s41467-021-24697-2 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 ↗
46. 10.1039/C9TA12889A10.1039/C9TA12889A ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.7b1153010.1021/acsami.7b11530 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0499010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04990 ↗
49. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/42/42400910.1088/0957-4484/24/42/424009 ↗
50. 10.1021/jz100708b10.1021/jz100708b ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1058210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582 ↗
52. 10.1149/2.1501714jes10.1149/2.1501714jes ↗