journal article·2023-03-10Open access

Energy Demand of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Based Fertilizers and Approaches to Circularity

Damilola A. Daramola, Marta C. Hatzell

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 8· Issue 3

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The climate-related concerns associated with the manufacturing of synthetic fertilizers are largely traced back to energy and carbon emissions during the chemical manufacturing of ammonia. However, synthetic fertilizers are made up of several macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium), each with different energy intensities and environmental impacts. With the movement toward resource circularity, there is a need to create a more holistic view regarding the process energy associated with synthetic inorganic fertilizers, including nitrogen and phosphorus. Here, we first describe the growing production and consumption of inorganic (synthetic) and organic (animal waste) nutrients in agriculture as well as the process energy associated with the production of granular phosphorus and nitrogen-based fertilizers. Next, we present projected global demand of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients based on various sustainability and societal equity scenarios to make an argument for nutrient recovery as a viable approach to meet this demand. Finally, we discuss the characteristics and challenges of emerging technologies for nutrient recovery along with baseline performance and costs of current operational recovery facilities.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phosphorus and nutrient management · Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Sustainable Energy and the Environment, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, United States

George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy · Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · Ohio Water Development Authority

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Brueske, S.; Kramer, C.; Fisher, A. Bandwidth Study on Energy Use and Potential Energy Saving Opportunities in U.S. Chemical Manufacturing, 2015. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1248749, Last Accessed: November 2nd, 2021.
2. U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral commodity summaries 2022. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/mcs2022, Last Accessed: April 27th, 2022.
3. Bhat, M. G.; English, B. C.; Turhollow, A. F.; Nyangito, H. O. Energy in synthetic fertilizers and pesticides: Revisited, 1994. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10120269, Last Accessed: October 21st, 2021.10.2172/10120269 ↗
4. Cousin, E.; Baskaran-Makanju, S.; Unnikrishnan, S.; Woods, W.; Mitchell, C.; Hoo, S. The War in Ukraine and the Rush to Feed the World, 2022. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/how-the-war-in-ukraine-is-affecting-global-food-systems, Last Accessed: August 7th, 2022.
5. The Royal Society. Ammonia: zero-carbon fertiliser, fuel and energy store, 2020. http://royalsociety.org/green-ammonia, Last Accessed: January 15th, 2023.
6. 10.1038/nplants.2017.7410.1038/nplants.2017.74 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.00510.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.10662910.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106629 ↗
9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT - Fertilizers by Nutrient. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RFN, Last Accessed: August 7th, 2022.
10. Ritchie, H.; Roser, M.; Rosado, P. Fertilizers, 2013; https://ourworldindata.org/fertilizers, Last Accessed: October 21st, 2021.
11. United States Department for Agriculture Economic Research Service. International Agricultural Productivity, 2022. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-agricultural-productivity, Last Accessed: April 21st, 2022.
12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Fertilizers Archive. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RA, Last Accessed: April 21st, 2022.
13. International Fertilizer Industry Association. Global phosphate rock production trends from 1961 to 2010: Reasons for the temporary set-back in 1988–1994, 2011. https://www.fertilizer.org/images/Library_Downloads/2011_ifa_pr_production_trends.pdf, Last Accessed: April 27th, 2022.
14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT - Fertilizers by Product. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RFB, Last Accessed: August 7th, 2022.
15. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume I Chapter 8: Inorganic Chemical Industry. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/ap-42-fifth-edition-volume-i-chapter-8-inorganic-1, Last Accessed: September 21st, 2022.
16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Urea Manufacturing Industry - Technical Document, 1981. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=2000MGKX.TXT, Last Accessed: August 10th, 2022.
17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ammonium Nitrate Manufacturing Industry - Technical Document, 1981. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=2000MGT1.TXT, Last Accessed: August 10th, 2022.
18. Jenssen T. K. · 2003
19. Fertilizers Europe. Best Available Techniques for Pollution Prevention and Control in the European Fertilizer Industry, Booklet No. 6 of 8: Production of Ammonium Nitrate and Calcium Ammonium Nitrate, 2000.
20. 10.1007/s10098-017-1440-z10.1007/s10098-017-1440-z ↗
21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The Future of Food and Agriculture - Alternative pathways to 2050, 2018. https://www.fao.org/3/I8429EN/i8429en.pdf, Last Accessed: August 28th, 2022.
22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global Perspectives Studies. https://www.fao.org/global-perspectives-studies/food-agriculture-projections-to-2050/en/, Last Accessed: August 30th, 2022.
23. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0167910.1021/acs.iecr.1c01679 ↗
24. International Energy Agency. Ammonia Technology Roadmap: Towards more sustainable nitrogen fertiliser production, 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/ammonia-technology-roadmap, Last Accessed: January 15th, 2023.
25. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0161410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01614 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0161510.1021/acsenergylett.2c01615 ↗
27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. AP-42, CH 11.21: Phosphate Rock Processing. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/c11s21.pdf, Last Accessed: January 17th, 2023.
28. 10.1149/2.F08224IF10.1149/2.F08224IF ↗
29. Yara International. Yara ready to enable the hydrogen economy with historic full-scale green ammonia project, 2020. https://www.yara.com/corporate-releases/yara-ready-to-enable-the-hydrogen-economy-with-historic-full-scale-green-ammonia-project/, Last Accessed: January 17th, 2023.
30. The Global CCS Institute. Global Status of CCS 2020. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Global-Status-of-CCS-Report-2020_FINAL_December11.pdf, Last Accessed: January 16th, 2023.
31. The Global CCS Institute. Global Status of CCS, 2022. https://status22.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Global-Status-of-CCS-2022_Download.pdf, Last Accessed: January 16th, 2023.
32. 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.00310.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.003 ↗
33. Hermann L. · 2022
34. Fuchs, H.; Rao, P. Survey of Available Information on U.S. Manufacturing Wastewater and Energy Requirements for Reuse, 2021. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1821428/, Last Accessed: June 1st, 2021.10.2172/1821428 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsestwater.1c0016610.1021/acsestwater.1c00166 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.00210.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.002 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.02010.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.020 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00253-015-6603-410.1007/s00253-015-6603-4 ↗
39. 10.1007/s12010-009-8866-710.1007/s12010-009-8866-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.algal.2016.05.01910.1016/j.algal.2016.05.019 ↗
41. 2000
42. 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.06310.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.063 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.07410.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.074 ↗
44. 10.1039/C9EW00981G10.1039/C9EW00981G ↗
45. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0061810.1021/acsenergylett.1c00618 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0205810.1021/acsenergylett.1c02058 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0076410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00764 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12248010.1016/j.cej.2019.122480 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0002410.1021/acsenergylett.8b00024 ↗
50. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc58f10.1149/1945-7111/abc58f ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.12710.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.127 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.03610.1016/j.watres.2012.09.036 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.03610.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.036 ↗
54. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0469110.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04691 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11789110.1016/j.watres.2021.117891 ↗
56. Ewert, W.; Hermanussen, O.; Kabbe, C.; Mêlè, C.; Niewersch, C.; Paillard, H.; Stössel, E.; Wagenbach, A. P-REX D5.1 Comparison of sludge related processes, 2014. https://zenodo.org/record/242550#.Y8ZbMHbMJD8, Last Accessed: October 29th, 2020.
57. European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform. Catalogue of phosphorus recovery technologies. https://phosphorusplatform.eu/images/download/ESPP-NNP-DPP_nutrient-recovery_tech_catalogue.pdf, Last Accessed: November 11th, 2022.
58. Butler B. · 2018
59. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0233510.1021/acsenergylett.2c02335 ↗