Tuning of the Contact Properties for High-Efficiency Si/PEDOT:PSS Heterojunction Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Heterojunction solar cells (HSCs) featuring half and full contact of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene (PEDOT:PSS) with pyramid-textured silicon (Si) were thoroughly compared via simulations and experiments, and the following conclusions have been reached: (1) The insufficient electrical passivation inherent to the half contact results in enormous decline in short-circuit current density ( J sc ) and open-circuit voltage ( V oc ). (2) For the full-contact HSCs, J sc is mainly dependent on the recombination at the rear interface. With tuning of the contact properties from both sides, calculated (experimental) efficiencies of 14.46%/16.89% (13.94%/16.21%) for the half-/full-contact HSCs were finally obtained. A superior power conversion efficiency (PCE) over 21% is further predicted by considering more optimal contact resistance as well as doping concentration of Si. Our findings clarify why textured-Si/PEDOT:PSS HSCs show V oc and PCE that are inferior to those of planar counterparts in previous reports and further suggest a pathway to fully explore the efficiency potential of Si/PEDOT:PSS hybrid solar cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ningbo Institute of Material Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
College of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province · Ningbo Municipality
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl300713x10.1021/nl300713x ↗
2. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0573210.1021/acsnano.5b05732 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0592810.1021/acsnano.5b05928 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.473424010.1063/1.4734240 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp401816210.1021/jp4018162 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.5b1169210.1021/acsami.5b11692 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.482211610.1063/1.4822116 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0395510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03955 ↗
9. 10.1038/nenergy.2015.3110.1038/nenergy.2015.31 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.11.00310.1016/j.solmat.2011.11.003 ↗
11. 10.1021/am503949g10.1021/am503949g ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0243210.1021/acsnano.5b02432 ↗
13. 10.1039/C4EE02282C10.1039/C4EE02282C ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20150074410.1002/aenm.201500744 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20140207610.1002/adma.201402076 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20140038010.1002/adfm.201400380 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20150179310.1002/aenm.201501793 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.03010.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.030 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn500418x10.1021/nn500418x ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0124010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01240 ↗
21. 10.1186/s11671-016-1397-610.1186/s11671-016-1397-6 ↗
22. 10.1364/OL.40.00107710.1364/OL.40.001077 ↗
23. 10.1364/OL.41.00132910.1364/OL.41.001329 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.485123610.1063/1.4851236 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0120210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01202 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.482730310.1063/1.4827303 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep1300810.1038/srep13008 ↗
28. 10.1038/srep1737110.1038/srep17371 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20130172410.1002/aenm.201301724 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b0008110.1021/acsphotonics.5b00081 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep3509110.1038/srep35091 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.5b1095910.1021/acsami.5b10959 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.6b0316410.1021/acsami.6b03164 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20140175810.1002/adfm.201401758 ↗
35. 10.1364/OL.38.00507110.1364/OL.38.005071 ↗
36. 10.1038/srep3050310.1038/srep30503 ↗
37. 10.1002/pip.215910.1002/pip.2159 ↗