journal article·2022-06-10

Protection of Cobalt-Free LiNiO2 from Degradation with Localized Saturated Electrolytes in Lithium-Metal Batteries

Laisuo Su, Eunmi Jo, Arumugam Manthiram

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 7· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

High-nickel layered oxide cathode materials are the most promising candidates for developing lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) because of their high energy density and low cost. Herein, we present a localized saturated electrolyte (LSE) based on readily available, low-cost LiPF6 salt with limited solubility in carbonate solvents for developing LiNiO2 cathodes. Compared to the conventional electrolyte that retains only 55% of the initial capacity after 200 cycles, the LSE retains a record 81% of the initial capacity after 600 deep cycles at 4.4 V (versus Li/Li+). The LSE protects the LiNiO2 surface from degrading into rock-salt and spinel phases during cycling and helps form a robust Li morphology on the Li-metal anode that is covered by an inorganic-rich solid-electrolyte interphase. The drastically enhanced cycling stability with LSE demonstrates the importance of developing robust electrolytes compatible with both high-Ni cathodes and Li-metal anodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.01310.1016/j.joule.2018.11.013 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-020-15355-010.1038/s41467-020-15355-0 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41560-019-0513-010.1038/s41560-019-0513-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.01810.1016/j.joule.2019.08.018 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.208595010.1149/1.2085950 ↗
6. U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral commodity summaries 2018
7. U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2018
8. 10.1149/2.0381813jes10.1149/2.0381813jes ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20181247210.1002/anie.201812472 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0030410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00304 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0144710.1021/acsenergylett.1c01447 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.0c1664810.1021/acsami.0c16648 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.0c1141310.1021/acsami.0c11413 ↗
14. 10.1166/jnn.2013.737910.1166/jnn.2013.7379 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12582110.1016/j.cej.2020.125821 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.07.02910.1016/j.jechem.2021.07.029 ↗
17. 10.1149/1945-7111/abd60e10.1149/1945-7111/abd60e ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0171410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01714 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20170610210.1002/adma.201706102 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0041514jes10.1149/2.0041514jes ↗
21. 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20200804410.3866/PKU.WHXB202008044 ↗
22. 10.1038/ncomms736210.1038/ncomms7362 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0369410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03694 ↗
24. 10.1016/0584-8539(71)80245-310.1016/0584-8539(71)80245-3 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.1c2163810.1021/acsami.1c21638 ↗
26. 10.1246/bcsj.2019031410.1246/bcsj.20190314 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-020-04871-510.1007/s10853-020-04871-5 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0528310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05283 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20200373810.1002/aenm.202003738 ↗
30. 10.1021/cm403332s10.1021/cm403332s ↗
31. 10.1149/1.161329110.1149/1.1613291 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10536710.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105367 ↗
33. 10.1039/D1EE03103A10.1039/D1EE03103A ↗