journal article·2023-06-09

Stainless Steel Felt as a Combined OER Electrocatalyst/Porous Transport Layer for Investigating Anion-Exchange Membranes in Water Electrolysis

Binyu Chen, Ana Laura G. Biancolli, Chase L. Radford, Steven Holdcroft

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 8· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Anion-exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE) is a promising technology for low-cost, high-efficiency, green hydrogen production. The stability of the AEM is a critical issue but difficult to delineate in situ from degradation of the catalyst layer (CL). Moreover, the porous transport layer (PTL) can contribute electrocatalytically. Herein, we demonstrate that stainless steel (SS) felt, in the absence of an anode CL, is highly active toward the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) (1 A cm –2 at 1.74 V cell ) and serves as a combined OER electrocatalyst and PTL, thus simplifying the study of AEMs in water electrolyzers. We further show that Ni felt exhibits much lower OER activity than SS felt, which suggests that in situ studies of OER electrocatalysts and CL compositions should be performed with Ni felt, not SS felt, to reduce OER contributions from the PTL. Lastly, we found that the substrate for depositing the cathode CL, AEM, or PTL strongly influences the rate of H 2 crossover.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby V5A 1S6, Canada

Nuclear and Energy Research Institute, IPEN/CNEN, 05508-000 São Paulo, Brazil

Funding

National Research Council Canada · Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado de S?o Paulo · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.15110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.25810.1016/j.rser.2017.05.258 ↗
3. 10.1039/C9SE01240K10.1039/C9SE01240K ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.10670410.1016/j.elecom.2020.106704 ↗
6. 10.1002/cssc.20220002710.1002/cssc.202200027 ↗
7. 10.3390/molecules2621632610.3390/molecules26216326 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22781410.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227814 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-020-0577-x10.1038/s41560-020-0577-x ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20200228510.1002/aenm.202002285 ↗
11. 10.1039/D0EE01842B10.1039/D0EE01842B ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20220038010.1002/smll.202200380 ↗
13. 10.1039/D2EE00273F10.1039/D2EE00273F ↗
14. 10.1039/C9EE00832B10.1039/C9EE00832B ↗
15. 10.1039/D0EE04086J10.1039/D0EE04086J ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.1c0605310.1021/acsami.1c06053 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.14310.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.143 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.9b1441510.1021/acsami.9b14415 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0420010.1021/acscatal.0c04200 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23213410.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232134 ↗
21. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0022110.1021/acscatal.5b00221 ↗
22. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0209010.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02090 ↗
23. 10.1039/C5EE01601K10.1039/C5EE01601K ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11796310.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117963 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14056110.1016/j.electacta.2022.140561 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14203010.1016/j.electacta.2023.142030 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.05.01710.1016/j.jelechem.2008.05.017 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23048410.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230484 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12080410.1016/j.memsci.2022.120804 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.02210.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.022 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.11921310.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119213 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1108136810.3390/ma11081368 ↗