Understanding Ionic Conductivity Trends in Polyborane Solid Electrolytes from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
Polyborane salts based on B 12 H 12 2–, B 10 H 10 2–, CB 11 H 12 –, and CB 9 H 10 – demonstrate high Li and Na superionic conductivity that makes them attractive as electrolytes in all-solid-state batteries. Their chemical and structural diversity creates a versatile design space that could be used to optimize materials with higher conductivity at lower temperatures; however, many mechanistic details remain enigmatic, including reasons why certain known modifications lead to improved performance. We use extensive ab initio molecular dynamics simulations to explore the dependence of ionic conductivity on cation/anion pair combinations for Li and Na polyborane salts. Further simulations are used to probe the influence of local modifications to chemistry, stoichiometry, and composition. Carbon doping, anion alloying, and cation off-stoichiometry are found to favorably introduce intrinsic disorder, facilitating local deviation from the expected cation population. Lattice expansion likewise has a positive effect by aiding anion reorientations that are critical for conduction. Implications for engineering polyboranes for improved ionic conductivity are discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Hydrogen Storage and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States
NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550, United States
Funding
Laboratory Directed Research and Development · National Nuclear Security Administration
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ssi.2009.03.02210.1016/j.ssi.2009.03.022 ↗
2. 10.1039/c3cc49805k10.1039/c3cc49805k ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0031010.1021/acsenergylett.6b00310 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20150223710.1002/aenm.201502237 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1005510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10055 ↗
6. 10.1039/C5EE02941D10.1039/C5EE02941D ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20140315710.1002/adma.201403157 ↗
8. 10.1021/ic801345h10.1021/ic801345h ↗
9. 10.1039/C5CE00369E10.1039/C5CE00369E ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0053310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00533 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.02410.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ensm.2016.03.00410.1016/j.ensm.2016.03.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.06110.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.061 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0156810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01568 ↗
15. 10.1039/C6TA07443J10.1039/C6TA07443J ↗
16. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat436910.1038/nmat4369 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.08.02010.1016/j.ssi.2015.08.020 ↗
20. 10.1039/c3cp53090f10.1039/c3cp53090f ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jssc.2014.01.00610.1016/j.jssc.2014.01.006 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0079010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00790 ↗
23. 10.1016/0038-1098(78)90233-810.1016/0038-1098(78)90233-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/0038-1098(81)90776-610.1016/0038-1098(81)90776-6 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.05590110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.055901 ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/32/20110.1088/0953-8984/14/32/201 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1020610.1103/PhysRevB.45.10206 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.16640110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.166401 ↗
29. 10.1016/0167-2738(94)90392-110.1016/0167-2738(94)90392-1 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.13430110.1103/PhysRevB.76.134301 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ssi.2005.12.02210.1016/j.ssi.2005.12.022 ↗