journal article·2025-12-15Open access

EVALUATION OF RECYCLING POTENTIAL OF VIRGIN MIXED HARDWOOD PULP TREATED WITH CELLULASE AND CHEMICALS

Department of Paper and Packaging Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Saharanpur Campus, Saharanpur – 247001, Uttar Pradesh, India, NISHI K. BHARDWAJ, PUNEET PATHAK, Avantha Centre for Industrial Research and Development (ACIRD), Thapar Technology Campus, Bhadson Road, Patiala – 147004, Punjab, India, CHAKARVATI SANGO, Avantha Centre for Industrial Research and Development (ACIRD), Thapar Technology Campus, Bhadson Road, Patiala – 147004, Punjab, India, ANSHUL SABHARWAL, Avantha Centre for Industrial Research and Development (ACIRD), Thapar Technology Campus, Bhadson Road, Patiala – 147004, Punjab, India, RAJEEV K. KAPOOR, Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak – 124001, Haryana, India, PRATYOOSH SHUKLA, School of Biotechnology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 59· Issue 9-10

Abstract

The global demand for paper continues to rise, increasing pressure on wood resources. Recycling waste paper provides a sustainable way to reduce reliance on virgin fibre. This study evaluated virgin mixed hardwood kraft pulp (VMHP) through nine recycling loops using either an alkaline chemical system or a cellulase-based enzymatic treatment. After each cycle, handsheets were prepared and assessed for pulp wetness, bulk, formation, tensile strength (breaking length), tear factor, burst factor, and optical properties (brightness, whiteness, yellowness). Enzymatic treatment offered better strength preservation, reflected in higher breaking length and burst factor compared to chemically treated pulp, though tear strength declined more sharply. In contrast, chemical treatment delivered superior optical performance, maintaining higher brightness and whiteness with lower yellowness. Overall, cellulase-based recycling better retained fibre strength, while chemical treatment enhanced optical quality. These findings highlight the potential of enzyme-assisted recycling as an environmentally friendly method for sustaining fibre performance across multiple cycles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Biofuel production and bioconversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 R. C. Howard and W. Bichard, J. Pulp Pap. Sci., 18, 151 (1992)
2. 2 L. N. Law, J. L. Valade and J. Quan, TAPPI J., 79, 167 (1996)
3. 3 L. N. Law, J. L. Valade and Z. Li, TAPPI J., 79, 181 (1996)
4. 4 I. Eriksson, P. Lunabba, A. Pettersson and G. Carlsson, TAPPI J., 80, 151 (1997)
5. 5 C. Sharma, N. J. Rao and S. P. Singh, IPPTA J. Convention Issue, Dec., 69 (1998)
6. 6 M. Garg and S. P. Singh, TAPPI J., 3, 25 (2004)
7. 7 M. A. Hubbe, BioResources, 2, 739 (2007), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.2.4.739-78810.15376/biores.2.4.739-788 ↗
8. 8 T. Yamauchi and M. Yamamoto, APPITA J., 61, 396 (2008)10.1353/bcc.0.0014 ↗
9. 9 Y. Chen, J. Wan, Q. Wu, Y. Ma and M. Huang, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 50, 1061 (2016), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT9-10(2016)/p.1061-1067.pdf
10. 10 N. Jirarotepinyo, J. Nguyen, A. Cross, H. Jameel and R. A. Venditti, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage., 27, 1901 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-025-02227-210.1007/s10163-025-02227-2 ↗
11. 11 Y. Chen, J. Wan, X. Zhang, Y. Ma and Y. Wang, Carbohyd. Polym., 87, 730 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.05110.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.051 ↗
12. 12 G. V. Laivins and A. M. Scallan, in Procs of the 10th Fundamental Research Symposium, PITA (Paper Industry Technical Association), Lancashire, U.K. Sept. 19-24, 1993, pp. 1235 1260
13. 13 M. M. Nazhad and L. Paszner, TAPPI J., 77, 171 (1994)
14. 14 M. Garg and S.P. Singh, APPITA J., 59, 274 (2006)10.1016/S0167-6423(05)00145-0 ↗
15. 15 M. Souček, Pap. Cellulose, 64, 164 (2009)10.1136/vr.164.2.64 ↗
16. 16 K. H. Choi, A. R. Kim and B. U. Cho, BioResources, 11, 3769 (2016)10.15376/biores.11.2.3769-3782 ↗
17. 17 F. Zeinaly, M. Karimi, J. Shakhes and H. Mohammadi, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 50, 285 (2016), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT2(2016)/p.285-292.pdf
18. 18 R. Singh and N. K. Bhardwaj, IPPTA J., 23, 121 (2011)
19. 19 R. Singh and N. K. Bhardwaj, IPPTA J., 22, 109 (2010)
20. 20 N. K. Bhardwaj, P. Bajpai and P. K. Bajpai, J. Biotechnol., 51, 21 (1996)
21. 21 K. P. Buzała, P. Przybysz, H. Kalinowska and M. Derkowska, PLOS One, 11, e0161575 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.016157510.1371/journal.pone.0161575 ↗
22. 22 P. K. Verma, N. K. Bhardwaj and S. P. Singh, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 94, 430 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2241010.1002/cjce.22410 ↗
23. 23 N. K. Bhardwaj, P. Bajpai and P. K. Bajpai, APPITA J., 48, 378 (1995)
24. 24 R. Singh, N. K. Bhardwaj and B. Choudhury, APPITA J., 67, 226 (2014)
25. 25 S. K. Gülsoy and S. Uysal, Drvna Ind., 71, 327 (2020), https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2020.190410.5552/drvind.2020.1904 ↗
26. 26 Y. Chen, J. Wan and Y. Ma, APPITA J., 62, 290 (2009)
27. 27 M. S. Jahan, TAPPI J., 2, 9 (2003)
28. 28 E. M. Cadena, A. I. Chiriac, F. I. J. Pastor, P. Díaz, T. Vidal et al., Biotechnol. Progress, 26, 960 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.41110.1002/btpr.411 ↗
29. 29 A. I. Chiriac, E. M. Cadena, T. Vidal, A. L. Torres, P. Díaz and F. I. J. Pastor, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 86, 1125 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2350-810.1007/s00253-009-2350-8 ↗
30. 30 M. A. Zanuttini, V. A. Marzocchi and P. Mocchiutti, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 43, 65 (2009), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT1-3-2009/p.65-69.pdf
31. 31 B. Sjöstrand, C. A. Karlsson, C. Barbier and G. Henriksson, BioResources, 18, 3856 (2023), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.18.2.3856-386910.15376/biores.18.2.3856-3869 ↗
32. 32 Z. Efrati, M. Talaeipour, A. Khakifirouz and B. Bazyar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 47, 547 (2013), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT7-8(2013)/p.547-551.pdf
33. 33 K. H. Choi, A. R. Kim and B. U. Cho, Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., 33, 503 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-305910.1515/npprj-2018-3059 ↗
34. 34 Y. Ji, Y. Peng, A. Strand, S. Fu, A. Sundberg et al., BioResources, 13, 7310 (2018), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.4.7310-732410.15376/biores.13.4.7310-7324 ↗
35. 35 H. Lee, W. S. Nam, S. D. Sohn and K. H. Paik, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 17, 100 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2010.12.00410.1016/j.jiec.2010.12.004 ↗
36. 36 M. Kmiotek, K. Dybka-Stępień and A. Karmazyn, BioResources, 16, 4221 (2021), https://ojs.bioresources.com/index.php/BRJ/article/view/2333310.15376/biores.16.2.4221-4236 ↗
37. 37 U. B. Mohlin and B. Pettersson, Progress Biotechnol., 21, 291 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-0423(02)80032-610.1016/S0921-0423(02)80032-6 ↗
38. 38 H. N. Banavath, N. K. Bhardwaj and A. K. Ray, IPPTA J., 21, 141 (2009)
39. 39 N. K. Bhardwaj, V. Hoang and K. L. Nguyen, Bioresour. Technol., 98, 1647 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.04010.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.040 ↗
40. 40 H. N. Banavath, N. K. Bhardwaj and A. K. Ray, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 4544 (2011)10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.109 ↗
41. 41 T. Okayama, Japan TAPPI J., 56, 986 (2001), https://doi.org/10.2524/jtappij.56.98610.2524/jtappij.56.986 ↗
42. 42 M. Li, K. Hu and S. Shao, Cogent Eng., 10, 2116828 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.211682810.1080/23311916.2022.2116828 ↗
43. 43 J. L. Klofta and M. L. Miller, Pulp Pap. Canada, 95, 41 (2004)
44. 44 M. A. Hubbe, BioResources, 1, 281 (2006), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.1.2.281-31810.15376/biores.1.2.281-318 ↗
45. 45 E. Afra, H. Yousefi, M. M. Hadilam and T. Nishino, Carbohyd. Polym., 97, 725 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.03210.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.032 ↗
46. 46 N. Gurnagul, D. H. Page and M. G. Paice, Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., 7, 152 (1992), https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1992-07-03-p152-15410.3183/npprj-1992-07-03-p152-154 ↗
47. 47 C. H. Ko, C. Y. Yang, F. C. Chang and L. D. Lin, J. Environ. Manage., 241, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.13310.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.133 ↗
48. 48 Margutti, G. Conio, P. Calvini and E. Pedemonte, Restaurator, 22, 67 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1515/rest.2001.6710.1515/REST.2001.67 ↗
49. 49 R. Solár, Wood Res., 54, 1 (2009), https://www.woodresearch.sk/wr/200904/01.pdf
50. 50 L. Li, S. Lee, H. L. Lee and H. Youn, BioResources, 6, 721 (2011), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.6.1.721-73610.15376/biores.6.1.721-736 ↗
51. 51 T. W. Jeffries, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 266, 277 (1992)10.1557/PROC-266-277 ↗
52. 52 C. Valls, E. M. Cadena and M. B. Roncero, Carbohyd. Polym., 92, 276 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.08310.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.083 ↗
53. 53 D. Zhang, X. Li and J. Zhao, Biomed. Res. Int., 1, 9497215 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/949721510.1155/2020/9497215 ↗
54. "