journal article·2025-12-15Open access

SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE-GLUTARALDEHYDE-La-GRAPHENE COMPOSITE BEADS AND THEIR APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF METHYLENE BLUE

Institute of Applied Chemistry School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, P. R. China, ZENGJIN FU, LEI TAN, Institute of Applied Chemistry School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, P. R. China, YAN HAO, Institute of Applied Chemistry School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, P. R. China, TINGRUI LIN, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Radiochemistry and Radiation Chemistry Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science, the Key Laboratory of Polymer Chemistry and Physics of the Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engine

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 59· Issue 9-10

Abstract

A novel adsorbent was developed through an innovative dual-crosslinking strategy. An environmentally friendly composite adsorbent based on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) incorporated with graphene oxide (GO) was prepared for the adsorptive removal of cationic methylene blue (MB). In this method, the synergistic action of La3+ and glutaraldehyde was utilized to fabricate carboxymethyl cellulose-glutaraldehyde-La-graphene composite beads (CMC-GA-La-GO) with significantly enhanced adsorption performance compared to its individual components. This paper outlined the synthesis of CMC-GA-La-GO as a straightforward and environmentally benign process. The raw materials were inexpensive and readily available. The resulting CMC-GA-La-GO beads were characterized by FTIR, XRD, TGA and SEM. Furthermore, the parameters associated with the dosage of the adsorbent were also subjected to optimization. The experimental data for the adsorption process were better fitted by the Langmuir model (R2=0.99), indicating a theoretical maximum adsorption capacity of 113.9 mgg−1, and were found to follow the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The gained results demonstrated that the CMC-GA-La-GO could be potentially applied as an effective adsorbent for MB removal from aqueous solutions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Fluoride Effects and Removal · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 R. P. Schwarzenbach, B. I. Escher, K. Fenner, T. B. Hofstetter, C. A. Johnson et al., Science, 313, 1072 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.112729110.1126/science.1127291 ↗
2. 2 A. Cruz-Rizo, S. Gutiérrez-Granados, R. Salazar and J. M. Peralta-Hernández, Separ. Purif. Technol., 172, 296 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.02910.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.029 ↗
3. 3 J. Zhao, Z. Lu, X. He, X. Zhang, Q. Li et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 5, 7723 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0117510.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01175 ↗
4. 4 E. D. D. Melo, A. H. Mounteer, L. H. D. S. Leão, R. C. B. Bahia and I. M. F. Campos, J. Hazard. Mater., 244-245, 329 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.05110.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.051 ↗
5. 5 A. A. Mohana, S. M. Farhad, N. Haque and B. K. Pramanik, Chemosphere, 284, 131430 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13143010.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131430 ↗
6. 6 M. Shahid, I. Shahid and F. Mohammad, J. Clean. Prod., 53, 310 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.03110.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.031 ↗
7. 7 Inamuddin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 121, 1046 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.06410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.064 ↗
8. 8 I. Khan, M. Usman, M. Imran and K. Saeed, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron., 31, 8971 (2020), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03431-610.1007/s10854-020-03431-6 ↗
9. 9 M. Contreras, C. D. Grande-Tovar, W. Vallejo and C. Chaves-López, Water, 11 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w1102028210.3390/w11020282 ↗
10. 10 E. N. Mohamed, A. I. Abd-Elhamid, A. A. El-Bardan, H. M. A. Soliman and M. S. Mohy-Eldin, Sci. Rep., 13, 14265 (2023), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41431-810.1038/s41598-023-41431-8 ↗
11. 11 P. O. Oladoye, T. O. Ajiboye, E. O. Omotola and O. J. Oyewola, Results Eng., 16, 100678 (2022), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.10067810.1016/j.rineng.2022.100678 ↗
12. 12 S. Shakoor and A. Nasar, Groundwater Sustain. Develop., 5, 152 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.06.00510.1016/j.gsd.2017.06.005 ↗
13. 13 A. Zuorro and R. Lavecchia, Desalin. Water Treat., 52, 1571 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.78755310.1080/19443994.2013.787553 ↗
14. 14 A. Khataee, G. Dehghan, M. Zarei, S. Fallah, G. Niaei et al., Chem. Ecol., 29, 221 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2012.74483110.1080/02757540.2012.744831 ↗
15. 15 Z. Aksu, S. Ertuğrul and G. Dönmez, Chem. Eng. J., 158, 474 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.02910.1016/j.cej.2010.01.029 ↗
16. 16 L. Liu, Z. Y. Gao, X. P. Su, X. Chen, L. Jiang et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 3, 432 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sc500848m10.1021/sc500848m ↗
17. 17 S. Chatterjee, D. S. Lee, M. W. Lee and S. H. Woo, Bioresour. Technol., 100, 2803 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.03510.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.035 ↗
18. 18 A. Dong, J. Xie, W. Wang, L. Yu, Q. Liu et al., J. Hazard. Mater., 181, 448 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.03110.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.031 ↗
19. 19 N. Fattahi, T. Fattahi, M. Kashif, A. Ramazani and W.-K. Jung, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 276, 133763 (2024), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13376310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133763 ↗
20. 20 C. Liu, A. M. Omer and X.-K. Ouyang, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 106, 823 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.08410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.084 ↗
21. 21 Z. Sun, Y. Yin, Y. An, C. Deng, Z. Wei et al., J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 10, 108179 (2022), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.10817910.1016/j.jece.2022.108179 ↗
22. 22 G. Zhang, L. Yi, H. Deng and P. Sun, J. Environ. Sci., 26, 1203 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60513-610.1016/S1001-0742(13)60513-6 ↗
23. 23 M. Yadollahi, I. Gholamali, H. Namazi and M. Aghazadeh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 74, 136 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.03210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.032 ↗
24. 24 W. Konicki, M. Aleksandrzak, D. Moszyński and E. Mijowska, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 496, 188 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.02.03110.1016/j.jcis.2017.02.031 ↗
25. 25 Y. Yang, S. Song and Z. Zhao, Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 513, 315 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.10.06010.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.10.060 ↗
26. 26 J. Liu, H. Chu, H. Wei, H. Zhu, G. Wang et al., RSC Adv., 6, 50061 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6RA06438H10.1039/C6RA06438H ↗
27. 27 V. H. Luan, H. N. Tien and S. H. Hur, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 437, 181 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.07110.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.071 ↗
28. 28 Y.-C. Shi, A.-J. Wang, X.-L. Wu, J.-R. Chen and J.-J. Feng, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 484, 254 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.09.00810.1016/j.jcis.2016.09.008 ↗
29. 29 X. He, L. Zeng, X. Cheng, C. Yang, J. Chen et al., Eur. Polym. J., 156, 110592 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.11059210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110592 ↗
30. 30 J. Wang, X. Lin, X. Luo and W. Yao, RSC Adv., 5, 59273 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA07024D10.1039/C5RA07024D ↗
31. 31 Q. Peng, T. Jin, C. Wang and Y. Qian, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 256, 128545 (2024), http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12854510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128545 ↗
32. 32 T. A. Saleh, A. Sarı and M. Tuzen, Chem. Eng. J., 307, 230 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.07010.1016/j.cej.2016.08.070 ↗
33. 33 Q. Xu, M. Zeng, Z. Feng, D. Yin, Y. Huang et al., RSC Adv., 6, 31484 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA28016H10.1039/C5RA28016H ↗
34. 34 S. Sharma and N. C. Kothiyal, RSC Adv., 5, 52642 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA08078A10.1039/C5RA08078A ↗
35. 35 Y. Hao, Y. Cui, J. Peng, N. Zhao, S. Li et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 208, 269 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.06810.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.068 ↗
36. 36 M. J. Zohuriaan-Mehr, A. Pourjavadi and M. Salehi-Rad, React. Funct. Polym., 61, 23 (2004), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.03.00610.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.03.006 ↗
37. 37 X. Ge, Y. Shan, L. Wu, X. Mu, H. Peng et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 197, 277 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.01410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.014 ↗
38. 38 H. Liu, X. Tian, X. Xiang and S. Chen, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 202, 632 (2022), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.05210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.052 ↗
39. 39 Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Wang, Z. Sun, J. Ma et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 101, 392 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.066 ↗
40. 40 H. Mittal, A. Al Alili, P. P. Morajkar and S. M. Alhassan, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 167, 1248 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.07910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.079 ↗
41. 41 H.-A. S. Tohamy, M. El-Sakhawy and S. Kamel, J. Polym. Environ., 29, 859 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01920-710.1007/s10924-020-01920-7 ↗
42. 42 A. I. Abd-Elhamid, E. M. Abu Elgoud and H. F. Aly, Cellulose, 29, 9831 (2022), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04862-610.1007/s10570-022-04862-6 ↗
43. 43 N. A. Dahlan, J. Pushpamalar, A. K. Veeramachineni and S. Muniyandy, J. Polym. Environ., 26, 2061 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1105-310.1007/s10924-017-1105-3 ↗
44. 44 A. S. Eltaweil, G. S. Elgarhy, G. M. El-Subruiti and A. M. Omer, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 154, 307 (2020), http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.12210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.122 ↗
45. 45 Z. Wang, A. Ning, P. Xie, G. Gao, L. Xie et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 157, 48 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.07010.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.070 ↗
46. 46 Y. Hao, J. Qu, L. Tan, Z. Liu, Y. Wang et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 233, 123643 (2023), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12364310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123643 ↗
47. 47 Y. Guo, B. Duan, L. Cui and P. Zhu, Cellulose, 22, 2035 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0630-210.1007/s10570-015-0630-2 ↗
48. 48 A. Abd-Elhamid, A. Nayl, A. A. E. Shanshory, H. M. Soliman and H. J. R. A. Aly, RSC Adv., 9, 5770 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8RA10449B10.1039/C8RA10449B ↗
49. 49 A. Saeed, M. Sharif and M. Iqbal, J. Hazard. Mater., 179, 564 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.04110.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.041 ↗
50. 50 E. Errais, J. Duplay, F. Darragi, I. M'Rabet, A. Aubert et al., Desalination, 275, 74 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.02.03110.1016/j.desal.2011.02.031 ↗
51. 51 B. K. Preetha and B Vishalakshi, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 103608 (2020), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.10360810.1016/j.jece.2019.103608 ↗
52. 52 H. Hosseini, A. Zirakjou, D. J. McClements, V. Goodarzi and W.-H. Chen, J. Hazard. Mater., 421, 126752 (2022), http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12675210.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126752 ↗
53. 53 G. K. Ramesha, A. Vijaya Kumara, H. B. Muralidhara and S. Sampath, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 361, 270 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.05010.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.050 ↗
54. 54 F. Ren, Z. Li, W.-Z. Tan, X.-H. Liu, Z.-F. Sun et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 532, 58 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.10110.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.101 ↗
55. 55 A. Verma, S. Thakur, G. Mamba, R. K. Gupta, P. Thakur et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 148, 1130 (2020), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.14210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.142 ↗
56. 56 Y. Zhu, Y. Zheng and A. Wang, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 72, 410 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.03910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.039 ↗
57. 57 S. Saber-Samandari, S. Saber-Samandari, H. Joneidi-Yekta and M. Mohseni, Appl. Surface Sci., 308, 1133 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.01710.1016/j.cej.2016.10.017 ↗
58. 58 Y. Yan, Q. An, Z. Xiao, W. Zheng and S. Zhai, Chem. Eng. J., 313, 475 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.09910.1016/j.cej.2016.12.099 ↗
59. 59 Y. Kong, Y. Zhuang, Z. Han, J. Yu, B. Shi et al., J. Environ. Sci., 78, 81 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.07.00610.1016/j.jes.2018.07.006 ↗
60. 60 F. Shakib, A. Dadvand Koohi and A. Kamran Pirzaman, Water Sci. Technol., 75, 1932 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.07710.2166/wst.2017.077 ↗
61. 61 F. Güzel, H. Sayğılı, G. Akkaya Sayğılı, F. Koyuncu and C. Yılmaz, J. Clean. Prod., 144, 260 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.02910.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.029 ↗
62. 62 N. Boukhalfa, M. Boutahala, N. Djebri and A. Idris, J. Mol. Liquids, 275, 431 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.06410.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.064 ↗
63. 63 A. A. Alqadami, M. Naushad, Z. A. Alothman and T. Ahamad, J. Environ. Manag., 223, 29 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.09010.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.090 ↗
64. 64 G. Zhou, Q. Wang, R. Song, S. Li, S. Yang et al., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 172, 111094 (2023), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.11109410.1016/j.jpcs.2022.111094 ↗
65. 65 T. Hertel, R. M. Novais, R. Murillo Alarcón, J. A. Labrincha and Y. Pontikes, J. Clean. Prod., 227, 877 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.08410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.084 ↗
66. 66 S. D. K. Seera, D. Kundu, P. Gami, P. K. Naik and T. Banerjee, Carbohyd. Polym., 256, 117520 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11752010.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117520 ↗
67. 67 R. M. Novais, G. Ascensão, D. M. Tobaldi, M. P. Seabra and J. A. Labrincha, J. Clean. Prod., 171, 783 (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.07810.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.078 ↗
68. "