ADSORPTION OF CEFIXIME TRIHYDRATE ONTO CHITOSAN 10B FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION: KINETIC, EQUILIBRIUM AND THERMODYNAMIC STUDIES
Source abstract
Abstract
An efficient and biodegradable adsorbent chitosan 10B was used to eliminate cefixime trihydrate from aqueous solution. The kinetic behavior of cefixime trihydrate adsorption onto chitosan 10B was studied in aqueous medium, from various operational aspects, such as contact time, solution pH, antibiotic concentrations, and temperatures. Cefixime adsorption onto chitosan 10B was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The antibiotic adsorption kinetics obeyed a pseudo-second-order model rather than pseudo-first-order and Elovich kinetic models. The best illustration of antibiotic adsorption equilibrium was made by the Langmuir model, with the highest adsorption ability qm: 37.04 μmol/g at 298 K. The activation energy (Ea) of the present adsorption system was computed to be 44.18 kJ/mol. The values of activation (ΔG‡, ΔH‡ and ΔS‡) and thermodynamic (ΔG, ΔH and ΔS) parameters confirmed that the cefixime trihydrate adsorption onto chitosan 10B in aqueous medium is an exothermic physisorption process. Cefixime desorption from antibiotic-loaded chitosan 10B was performed in 0.1 M NaOH solution and the recycled adsorbent was utilized for a second time without significant loss of its adsorption capacity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 R. Gothwal and T. Shashidhar, Clean – Soil, Air, Water, 43, 479 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.20130098910.1002/clen.201300989 ↗
2. 2 S. B. Levy, Clin. Infect. Dis., 33, S124 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1086/32183710.1086/321837 ↗
3. 3 B. Bengtsson and C. Greko, Ups. J. Med. Sci., 119, 96 (2014), https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2014.90144510.3109/03009734.2014.901445 ↗
4. 4 L. B. Rice, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 12, 476 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2009.08.00110.1016/j.mib.2009.08.001 ↗
5. 5 J. L. Martínez, Science, 321, 365 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115948310.1126/science.1159483 ↗
6. 6 H. Yao, J. Lu, J. Wu, Z. Lu, P. C. Wilson et al., Water Air Soil Pollut., 224, 1370 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1370-710.1007/s11270-012-1370-7 ↗
7. 7 N. Dorival-García, A. Zafra-Gómez, A. Navalón, J. González and J. L. Vílchez, Sci. Total Environ., 442, 317 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.02610.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.026 ↗
8. 8 K. Yaghmaeian, G. Moussavi and A. Alahabadi, Chem. Eng. J., 236, 538 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.11810.1016/j.cej.2013.08.118 ↗
9. 9 H. R. Pouretedal and N. Sadegh, J. Water Process. Eng., 1, 64 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.03.00610.1016/j.jwpe.2014.03.006 ↗
10. 10 V. Homem and L. Santos, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 2304 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.02310.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.023 ↗
11. 11 Y. Kitazono, I. Ihara, G. Yoshida, K. Toyoda and K. Umetsu, J. Hazard. Mater., 243, 112 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.00910.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.009 ↗
12. 12 S. R. Batchu, V. R. Panditi, K. E. O'Shea and P. R. Gardinali, Sci. Total Environ., 470-471, 299 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.05710.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.057 ↗
13. 13 G. Prados-Joya, M. Sánchez-Polo, J. Rivera-Utrilla and M. Ferro-Garcia, Water Res., 45, 393 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.01510.1016/j.watres.2010.08.015 ↗
14. 14 M. Gholami, R. Mirzaei, R. R. Kalantary, A. Sabzali and F. Gatei, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 9, 19 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-9-1910.1186/1735-2746-9-19 ↗
15. 15 S. D. Jojoa-Sierra, J. Silva-Agredo, E. Herrera-Calderon and R. A. Torres-Palma, Sci. Total Environ., 575, 1228 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.20110.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.201 ↗
16. 16 Z. P. Xing and D. Z. Sun, J. Hazard. Mater., 168, 1264 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.00810.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.008 ↗
17. 17 C. W. McKinney and A. Pruden, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 13393 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1021/es303652q10.1021/es303652q ↗
18. 18 M. T. Guo, Q. B. Yuan and J. Yang, Water Res., 47, 6388 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.01210.1016/j.watres.2013.08.012 ↗
19. 19 J. Rivera-Utrilla, G. Prados-Joya, M. Sánchez-Polo, M. A. Ferro-García and I. Bautista-Toledo, J. Hazard. Mater., 170, 298 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.09610.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.096 ↗
20. 20 L. Ji, W. Chen, L. Duan and D. Zhu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2322 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1021/es803268b10.1021/es803268b ↗
21. 21 G. Nazari, H. Abolghasemi and M. Esmaieli, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 58, 357 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.06.00610.1016/j.jtice.2015.06.006 ↗
22. 22 P. Liao, Z. Zhan, J. Dai, X. Wu, W. Zhang et al., Chem. Eng. J., 228, 496 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.11810.1016/j.cej.2013.04.118 ↗
23. 23 W. Xiong, G. Zeng, Z. Yang, Y. Zhou, C. Zhang et al., Sci. Total Environ., 627, 235 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.24910.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.249 ↗
24. 24 S. Karmaker, A. J. Nag and T. K. Saha, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 53, 373 (2019), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.3810.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.38 ↗
25. 25 S. Karmaker, T. Sen and T. K. Saha, Polym. Bull., 72, 1879 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1378-410.1007/s00289-015-1378-4 ↗
26. 26 D. S. Franco, J. Vieillard, N. P. G. Salau and G. L. Dotto, J. Mol. Liq., 304, 112758 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11275810.1016/j.molliq.2020.112758 ↗
27. 27 M. E. González-López, A. A. Pérez-Fonseca, M. Arellano, C. Gómez and J. R. Robledo-Ortíz, Environ. Technol. Innov., 19, 100824 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.10082410.1016/j.eti.2020.100824 ↗
28. 28 M. Usman, A. Ahmed, B. Yu, S. Wang, Y. Shen et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 255, 11786 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11748610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117486 ↗
29. 29 M. Frye, S. E. Vasisth, A. Atassi, D. Mazyck and J. C. Nino, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 87 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.0910.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2021.55.09 ↗
30. 30 Y. Huang, C. Hu, Y. An, Z. Xiong, X. Hu et al., J. Hazard. Mater., 405, 124195 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12419510.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124195 ↗
31. 31 S. Fan, J. Chen, C. Fan, G. Chen, S. Liu et al., J. Hazard. Mater., 416, 126225 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12622510.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126225 ↗
32. 32 M. J. Sharifi, A. Nouralishahi, A. Hallajisani and M. Askari, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 185 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.2010.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2021.55.20 ↗
33. 33 M. Rinaudo, Prog. Polym. Sci., 31, 603 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001 ↗
34. 34 K. Satoshi, M. Akira, K. Shigetaka and M. Yukiyoshi, Int. J. Pharm., 56, 125 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(89)90005-710.1016/0378-5173(89)90005-7 ↗
35. 35 T. D. Pham, T. T. Bui, T. T. T. Truong, T. H. Hoang, T. S. Le et al., J. Mol. Liq., 298, 111981 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11198110.1016/j.molliq.2019.111981 ↗
36. 36 M. H. Rasoulifard, S. Khanmohammadi and A. Heidari, Water Sci. Technol., 74, 1069 (2016), https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.23010.2166/wst.2016.230 ↗
37. 37 A. Pandiarajan, R. Kamaraj and S. Vasudevan, New J. Chem., 41, 4518 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NJ04075F10.1039/C6NJ04075F ↗
38. 38 W. S. Adriano, V. Veredas, C. C. Santana and L. B. Gonçalves, Biochem. Eng. J., 27, 132 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2005.08.01010.1016/j.bej.2005.08.010 ↗
39. 39 M. E. Mahmoud, A. M. El-Ghanam, R. H. A. Mohamed and S. R. Saad, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 108, 110199 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11019910.1016/j.msec.2019.110199 ↗
40. 40 Z. Li, X. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Yang and J. Duan, Chem. Eng. J., 413, 127494 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12749410.1016/j.cej.2020.127494 ↗
41. 41 T. K. Saha, R. K. Bishwas, S. Karmaker and Z. Islam, ACS Omega, 5, 13358 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c0149310.1021/acsomega.0c01493 ↗
42. 42 P. Udaybhaskar, L. Iyengar and A. V. S. P. Rao, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 39, 739 (1990), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1990.07039032210.1002/app.1990.070390322 ↗
43. 43 N. Sanli, S. Sanli, U. Sızır, M. Gumustas and S. A. Ozkan, Chromatographia, 73, 1171 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2013-710.1007/s10337-011-2013-7 ↗
44. 44 S. Karmaker, A. J. Nag and T. K. Saha, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 94, 2349 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602442011012610.1134/S0036024420110126 ↗
45. 45 T. K. Saha, N. C. Bhoumik, S. Karmaker, M. G. Ahmed, H. Ichikawa et al., Clean – Soil, Air, Water, 39, 984 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.20100031510.1002/clen.201000315 ↗
46. 46 M. Erşan, E. Bağda and E. Bağda, Colloid. Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 104, 75 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.11.03410.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.11.034 ↗
47. 47 S. Y. Lagergren, K. Sven. Vetenskapsakad. Handl., 24, 1 (1898)
48. 48 Y. S. Ho and G. McKay, Process Biochem., 34, 451 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-510.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 ↗
49. 49 S. Y. Elovich and O. G. Larinov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Khim. Nauk., 2, 209 (1962)
50. 50 Y. S. Ho and G. McKay, Chem. Eng. J., 70, 115 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-0467(98)00076-110.1016/S0923-0467(98)00076-1 ↗
51. 51 Z. Bekçi, Y. Seki and M. K. Yurdakoç, J. Hazard. Mater., 133, 233 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.02910.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.029 ↗
52. 52 S. Karmaker, F. Sintaha and T. K. Saha, Adv. Bio. Chem., 9, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.4236/abc.2019.9100110.4236/abc.2019.91001 ↗
53. 53 H. M. F. Freundlich, Z. Phys. Chem., 57, 385 (1906), https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-1907-572310.1515/zpch-1907-5723 ↗
54. 54 M. I. Temkin and V. Pyzhev, Acta Physiochim. URSS, 12, 217 (1940)
55. 55 I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 40, 1361 (1918), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a00410.1021/ja02242a004 ↗
56. 56 K. R. Hall, L. C. Eagleton, A. Acrivers and T. Vermenlem, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 5, 212 (1966), https://doi.org/10.1021/i160018a01110.1021/i160018a011 ↗
57. 57 L. S. Chan, W. H. Cheung, S. J. Allen and G. McKay, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 20, 535 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60216-410.1016/S1004-9541(11)60216-4 ↗
58. 58 J. G. Domszy and G. A. Roberts, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 186, 1671 (1985), https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.1985.02186081510.1002/macp.1985.021860815 ↗
59. 59 G. L. Dotto and L. A. A. Pinto, Carbohyd. Polym., 84, 231 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.02810.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.028 ↗
60. 60 Y. Liu, Colloid. Surf. A, 274, 34 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.08.02910.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.08.029 ↗
61. 61 A. Fakhri and S. Adami, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 1001 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.02810.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.028 ↗