journal article·2023-02-28Open access

DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF HEMP-CONTAINING HYBRID YARNS FOR CLOTHING

", GAMZE OKYAY, Department of Fashion Design, Yesilyurt Vocational School, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey", OGUZ DEMIRYUREK, Department of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey, MÜNEVVER ERTEK AVCI, "Department of Textile, Clothing, Footwear, and Leather, Yesilyurt Vocational School, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey", HILAL BILGIC, "Department of Textile, Clothing, Footwear, and Leather, Yesilyurt Vocational School, Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Malatya, Turkey"

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 57· Issue 1-2

Abstract

"Known for its sustainable properties, the usability of hemp instead of conventional cotton hybrid yarns for clothing was investigated by spinning hybrid ring yarns using conventional cotton, viscose-hemp, and organic cotton-viscose-hemp blends for the sheath and elastane and polyester (Lycra and T400) for the core in the yarn structure. Unevenness, yarn imperfections, hairiness, tenacity, and breaking elongation properties of the spun hybrid yarns were examined comparatively by statistical analysis methods. The findings revealed that sheath fiber type, number of components in the yarn structure, and blend ratio were influential factors on yarn quality. Using hemp fiber in the yarn structure slightly decreased the yarn properties, except for tenacity, in general. This situation was more visible in hybrid yarns, which have three different fibers in the sheath. Blending viscose and hemp fibers in the yarn sheath structure provided a synergetic effect, improving the weak properties of both fibers. These yarns had nearly the same tenacity values (from 12.98 to 15.47) as conventional cotton yarns (from 15.24 to 16.8), which could be explained by the fact that hemp fiber has a higher tenacity value (45 cN/tex) than other fibers. Moreover, these yarns had the highest elongation values (from 15.88 to 10.79) due to the good elongation properties of the viscose fibers (20%), compared to other sheath fibers. As a result, when the produced yarns were evaluated in terms of sustainability and performance, viscose-hemp-blended yarns had the optimum yarn properties."
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tree Root and Stability Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 S. S. Muthu, "Sustainability in Denim", United Kingdom, Elsevier, 2017
2. 2 Y. J. Dhir, in: "Waste Management in the Fashion and Textile Industries", edited by R. Nayak and A. Patnaik, Woodhead Publishing, 2021, pp. 31-5810.1016/B978-0-12-818758-6.00002-8 ↗
3. 3 M. R. Khan and M. Islam, Text. Cloth. Sustain., 1, 1 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40689-015-0008-810.1186/s40689-015-0008-8 ↗
4. 4 S. S. Muthu, "Sustainability in the Textile Industry", Hong Kong, Springer, 201710.1007/978-981-10-2639-3 ↗
5. 5 M. C. S. D. Abreu, in: "Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing", edited by S. Muthu, Springer, 2015, pp. 1-2110.1007/978-981-287-164-0_1 ↗
6. 6 B. Resta, P. Gaiardelli, R. Pinto and S. Dotti, J. Clean Prod., 135, 620 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.13510.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.135 ↗
7. 7 H. Lewis, J. Gertsakis, T. Grant, N. Morelli and A. Sweatman, "Design Environment: A Global Guide to Designing Greener Goods", Routledge, 201710.4324/9781351282208 ↗
8. 8 US Environmental Protection Agency, https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch04/final/c4s11.pdf (accessed 17 February 2016)
9. 9 G. Sweeny, http://www.alternet.org/environment/its-second-dirtiest-thing-world-and-you're-wearing-it (accessed 2 March 2016)
10. 10 Organic cotton, http://www.organiccotton.org/oc/Cottongeneral/Impact-of-cotton/Risk-of-cotton-farming.php (Accessed 2 March 2016)
11. 11 A. Basit, W. Latif, S. A. Baig and A. Afzal, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 36, 267 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X1878277810.1177/0887302X18782778 ↗
12. 12 Z. A. Abro, N. Chen, Z. Yifan, H. Cheng-Yu, A. M. R. Abassi et al., Autex Res. J., 18, 323 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2018-001710.1515/aut-2018-0017 ↗
13. 13 A. M. Adnan and S. M. Imran, Master's Thesis, University of Boras, Boras, 2010
14. 14 D. Eichinger and J. Leitner, "Cotton Blends with Tencel® and Lenzing Modal", Lenzing AG, Austria, 2000, p. 1-7
15. 15 F. Afroz and M. M. Islam, Heliyon, 7, e08243 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0824310.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08243 ↗
16. 16 N. Okur, J. Nat. Fibers, 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.199348810.1080/15440478.2021.1993488 ↗
17. 17 M. J. Ebskamp, Trends Biotechnol., 20, 229 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01953-410.1016/S0167-7799(02)01953-4 ↗
18. 18 A. G. D. Schumacher, S. Pequito and J. Pazour, J. Clean Prod., 268, 122180 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12218010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122180 ↗
19. 19 A. Curteza, Radar, 2, 19 (2011)10.5920/radar.2011.2119 ↗
20. 20 Green choices, http://www.greenchoices.org/green-living/clothes/more-sustainable-fabrics (Accessed 2 March 2016)
21. 21 L. Mwaikambo, Afr. J. Sci. Technol., 7, 120 (2006)
22. 22 M. Ahirwar and B. K. Behera, J. Text. Inst., 113, 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2021.190979910.1080/00405000.2021.1909799 ↗
23. 23 S. Rana, S. Pichandi, S. Parveen and R. Fangueiro, in "Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing", edited by S. Muthu, Springer, 2014, pp. 1-3510.1007/978-981-287-065-0_1 ↗
24. 24 M. Kostic, B. Pejic and P. Skundric, BioResour. Technol., 99, 94 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.05010.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.050 ↗
25. 25 B. A. Khan, P. Warner and H. Wang, BioResources, 9, 3642 (2014)10.15376/biores.9.2.3642-3659 ↗
26. 26 D. E. Akin, L. L. Rigsby, N. Patel and K. L. Eriksson, TRJ, 67, 829 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175970670110710.1177/004051759706701107 ↗
27. 27 Y. Liu, R. C. Xu and Y. P. Zhang, Adv. Mater. Res., 332, 667 (2011), https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.332-334.66710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.332-334.667 ↗
28. 28 M. Liu, D. Fernando, G. Daniel, B. Madsen A. S. Meyer et al., Ind. Crop. Prod., 69, 29 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.01010.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.010 ↗
29. 29 M. Nykter, H. R. Kymäläinen, A. B. Thomsen, H. Lilholt, H. Koponen et al., Biomass Bioenerg., 32, 392 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.01510.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.015 ↗
30. 30 J. Kamat, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada, 2000
31. 31 B. Mazian, A. Bergeret, J. C. Benezet and L. Malhautier, Ind. Crop. Prod., 116, 170 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.06210.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.062 ↗
32. 32 M. Gregoire, L. E. De, M. Bar, S. Musio, S. Amaducci et al., SN Appl. Sci., 1, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1332-410.1007/s42452-019-1332-4 ↗
33. 33 P. Lyu, L. Xia, X. Jiang, X. Liu, W. Xu et al., Ind. Crop. Prod., 178, 114620 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11462010.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114620 ↗
34. 34 S. Amaducci and H. J. Gusovius, in "Industrial Applications of Natural Fibres: Structure, Properties and Technical Applications", edited by J. Müssig, Wiley, 2010, pp. 109-13410.1002/9780470660324.ch5 ↗
35. 35 P. Anand, D. Rajesh, M. Shunmuga Sundaram and V. Anbumalar, J. Nat. Fibers, 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.198280910.1080/15440478.2021.1982809 ↗
36. 36 P. Anand and V. Anbumalar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 51, 91 (2017), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT1-2(2017)/p.91-101.pdf
37. 37 F. J. Alonso-Montemayor, Q. Tarrés, H. Oliver-Ortega, F. X. Espinach, R. I. Narro-Céspedes et al., Polymers, 12, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1205104110.3390/polym12051041 ↗
38. 38 M. M. Kabir, M. Y. Al-Haik, S. H. Aldajah, K. T. Lau and H. Wang, Fibers Polym., 21, 2098 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-9630-410.1007/s12221-020-9630-4 ↗
39. 39 S. Dalle Vacche, V. Karunakaran, S. M. Ronchetti, A. Vitale and R. Bongiovanni, J. Compos. Sci., 5, 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs501001110.3390/jcs5010011 ↗
40. 40 A. K. Bledzki, H. P. Fink and K. Specht, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 93, 2150 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2071210.1002/app.20712 ↗
41. 41 R. Joffe and J. Andersons, in "Natural Filler and Fibre Composites: Development and Characterisation", edited by S. Syngellakis, WIT, 2015, pp. 13-2610.2495/978-1-78466-147-2/002 ↗
42. 42 E. Twite‐Kabamba, A. Mechraoui and D. Rodrigue, Polym. Compos., 30, 1401 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2070410.1002/pc.20704 ↗
43. 43 H. C. Han and X. L. Gong, Polym. Compos., 37, 385 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2319110.1002/pc.23191 ↗
44. 44 M. Ertek Avci and O. Demiryurek, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 56, 1089 (2022), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.9710.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.97 ↗
45. 45 S. H. Ç. Aydoğdu and D. Yilmaz, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 54, 381 (2020), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.3910.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.39 ↗
46. 46 O. Demiryürek and A. Kılıç, Ind. Text., 69, 1 (2018)
47. 47 O. Demiryürek and D. Uysaltürk, Fibers Text. East. Eur., 1, 22 (2014)
48. 48 S. A. Malik, A. Tanwari, U. Syed, R. F. Qureshi and N. Mengal, J. Nat. Fibers, 9, 197 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2012.70644610.1080/15440478.2012.706446 ↗
49. 49 A. Das and R. Chakraborty, Ind. J. Fib. Text. Res., 38, 237 (2013).
50. 50 M. B. Qadir, T. Hussain, M. Malik, F. Ahmad and S. H. Jeong, J. Text. Inst., 105, 753 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2013.84804510.1080/00405000.2013.848045 ↗
51. 51 O. Babaarslan, TRJ, 71, 367 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175010710041510.1177/004051750107100415 ↗
52. "