journal article·2020-06-12

Effect of Chelation on Iron–Chromium Redox Flow Batteries

Scott E. Waters, Brian H. Robb, Michael P. Marshak

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 5· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The iron–chromium (FeCr) redox flow battery (RFB) was among the first flow batteries to be investigated because of the low cost of the electrolyte and the 1.2 V cell potential. We report the effects of chelation on the solubility and electrochemical properties of the Fe3+/2+ redox couple. An Fe electrolyte utilizing diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) exhibits efficient and high-performance flow battery cycling at pH 9 versus a Cr-chelate complex utilizing 1,3-diaminopropanetetraacetic acid (PDTA). The FeDTPA electrolyte can be cycled at concentrations up to 1.35 M, equating to a storage capacity of 36.2 Ah L–1, with near-quantitative efficiency. When paired with a CrPDTA electrolyte, the equilibrium cell potential of the all-chelated FeCr RBF is 1.2 V with a maximum discharge power of 216 mW cm–2. Key aspects of the coordination chemistry of FeDTPA are compared with CrPDTA and highlight the importance of molecular-level understanding for driving flow battery system performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado—Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States

Funding

University of Colorado Boulder · Division of Graduate Education · U.S. Department of Education

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/14356007.a10_095.pub210.1002/14356007.a10_095.pub2 ↗
2. 10.1351/pac19976901001310.1351/pac199769010013 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.174272310.1063/1.1742723 ↗
4. 10.1021/ja00499a01310.1021/ja00499a013 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10800-011-0348-210.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
6. 10.1149/1.212766310.1149/1.2127663 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.10.04010.1016/j.electacta.2005.10.040 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.210034410.1149/1.2100344 ↗
9. 10.1021/cr500720t10.1021/cr500720t ↗
10. 10.1039/c2ra20839c10.1039/c2ra20839c ↗
11. 10.2514/6.1979-98910.2514/6.1979-989 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.09510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.095 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.218604010.1149/1.2186040 ↗
14. 10.1021/ic00318a00910.1021/ic00318a009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.00210.1016/j.joule.2019.07.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)85422-510.1016/S0020-1693(00)85422-5 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja00991a00710.1021/ja00991a007 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja00966a01210.1021/ja00966a012 ↗
19. 10.1016/0022-1902(75)80863-310.1016/0022-1902(75)80863-3 ↗
20. Martell, A. E.; Smith, R. M.; Motekaitis, R. J. Database 46: NIST Critically Selected Stability Constants of Metal Complexes, version 8; Database; NIST, 2004.
21. Bard A. J. · 1985
22. 10.1016/0378-7753(89)80126-010.1016/0378-7753(89)80126-0 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja01010a02410.1021/ja01010a024 ↗
24. 10.1039/B303234P10.1039/B303234P ↗
25. 10.1021/ic00020a03410.1021/ic00020a034 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja01473a04010.1021/ja01473a040 ↗
27. 10.1039/TF952480093710.1039/TF9524800937 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0059910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599 ↗
29. 10.1016/0378-7753(92)80133-V10.1016/0378-7753(92)80133-V ↗