Cross-Linked Chains of Metal–Organic Framework Afford Continuous Ion Transport in Solid Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted intensive study as solid electrolytes (SEs) in recent years. However, MOF particles work separately in SEs and numerous interfaces hinder a high-efficiency ion transport, which lowers the performance of solid-state batteries (SSBs). Herein, continuous ion-conductive paths were constructed by cross-linked MOF chains. Chains of a newly developed MOF (Zr-BPDC-2SO3H) were grown on bacterial cellulose (BC) nanofibers to provide a continuous ion transport network. The cross-linked MOF chains exhibit a high ionic conductivity of 7.88 × 10–4 S cm–1 at 25 °C, single-ion transport ability (tLi+=0.88), a wide electrochemical window up to 5.10 V, excellent interface compatibility, and the capability for suppressing lithium dendrites. Most importantly, the SSB fabricated with the cross-linked MOF chains shows more than 100% improved specific capacity in comparison to an SSB without this design and stable cycling performance at 3 C. This work provides a splendid strategy for developing high-performance SEs with porous ion conductors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Materials and Energy Storage Devices School of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, People’s Republic of China
Synergy Innovation Institute of GDUT, Heyuan 517000, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province · Foundation for Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aenm.20190016110.1002/aenm.201900161 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.05310.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.053 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.01310.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.013 ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20200037510.1002/anie.202000375 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.02610.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.026 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20190276710.1002/aenm.201902767 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-019-11960-w10.1038/s41467-019-11960-w ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20200317710.1002/anie.202003177 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.02010.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.020 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20170570210.1002/adma.201705702 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.00910.1016/j.joule.2018.07.009 ↗
12. 10.1039/D0CS00305K10.1039/D0CS00305K ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.10.03810.1016/j.mattod.2018.10.038 ↗
14. 10.1002/smtd.20170018710.1002/smtd.201700187 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21336610.1016/j.ccr.2020.213366 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.10.02610.1016/j.micromeso.2014.10.026 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20190709010.1002/adma.201907090 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.02410.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.024 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20150935210.1002/anie.201509352 ↗
20. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.10010.1038/nenergy.2016.100 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0298610.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02986 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.0c0438710.1021/acsami.0c04387 ↗
23. 10.1039/C9NR10338D10.1039/C9NR10338D ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20200394510.1002/adfm.202003945 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20170747610.1002/adma.201707476 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8TA05642K10.1039/C8TA05642K ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.01.00710.1016/j.ensm.2019.01.007 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.9b1537410.1021/acsami.9b15374 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41563-019-0431-310.1038/s41563-019-0431-3 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41557-019-0263-410.1038/s41557-019-0263-4 ↗
31. 10.1039/C3QI00093A10.1039/C3QI00093A ↗
32. 10.1016/0032-3861(87)90394-610.1016/0032-3861(87)90394-6 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0151710.1021/acsenergylett.0c01517 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20190026010.1002/aenm.201900260 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.6b1385910.1021/acsami.6b13859 ↗