journal article·2024-07-22Open access

OPTIMIZATION OF PURIFIED CELLULOSE EXTRACTION FROM CORN COB AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ISOLATED PRODUCT

Department of Chemical Science, Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak, Malaysia, YEE SHUI NG, ZHONG XIAN OOI, Department of Chemical Science, Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak, Malaysia, YI PENG TEOH, Department of Petrochemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak, Malaysia, MEI LEE OOI, Department of Chemical Science, Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak, Malaysia, PENG YONG HOO, Frontier Materials Research, Centre of Excellence (FrontMate), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), 02100 Perlis, Malaysia

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 58· Issue 5-6

Abstract

This study reported the isolation of cellulose from corn cob by using microwave-assisted alkaline treatment and bleaching. The Central Composite Design (CCD) approach of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was applied to study the effect of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) concentrations (1.5-2.5M), duration of alkaline treatment (4-8 min), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations (7-9 wt%) and bleaching time (3-7 min) on the removal percent of non-cellulosic components and impurities from corn cob. The optimized conditions obtained from this study were 2.37M NaOH, 9 wt% H2O2, alkaline treatment time of 4 min, and bleaching time – 4.20 min. The non-cellulosic part and the impurities removed under the optimized conditions in microwave-assisted alkaline treatment and bleaching amounted to 72.26 ± 0.15%. The cellulose content in the thus purified corn cob material was determined as 92.47%. The isolated corn cob cellulose was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), and the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). These characterizations confirmed that the alkaline treatment and microwave-assisted bleaching under the optimized conditions achieved the optimal removal percent of the non-cellulosic components and impurities from the corn cob biomass to achieve highly purified cellulose.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Lignin and Wood Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 S. Zafar, 2019, Biomass Wastes, [online] available at: https://www.altenergymag.com/article/2009/08/biomass-wastes/530/ [accessed 10 January 2022]
2. 2 Freie Universität Berlin, 2014, Categories of Biomass Material, [online] accessed at: [Accessed 10 January 2022]
3. 3 J. A. Okolie, S. Nanda, A. K. Dalai and J. A. Kozinski, Waste Biomass Valoriz., 12, 2145 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01123-010.1007/s12649-020-01123-0 ↗
4. 4 H. V. Lee, B. A. Hamid and S. K. Zain, The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1 (2014), https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/63101310.1155/2014/631013 ↗
5. 5 F. Luzi, D. Puglia and L. Torre, in "Biomass, Biopolymer-Based Materials, and Bioenergy", edited by D. Verma, E. Fortunati, S. Jain and X. Zhang, Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp. 179-201, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102426-3.00010-210.1016/B978-0-08-102426-3.00010-2 ↗
6. 6 I. Gan and W. S. Chow, Food Packag. Shelf Life, 17, 150 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.01210.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.012 ↗
7. 7 M. Shahbandeh, Statista, 2022, accessed at: [Accessed 25 June 2022]
8. 8 Y. Zou, J. Fu, Z. Chen and L. Ren, Agriculture, 11, 556 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1106055610.3390/agriculture11060556 ↗
9. 9 N. Tripathi, C. D. Hills, R. S. Singh and C. J. Atkinson, Climate Atmosph. Sci., 2, 35 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0093-510.1038/s41612-019-0093-5 ↗
10. 10 Z. Ali, M. Hussain and M. Arshad, Int. J. Biosci., 5, 204 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.3.204-21310.12692/ijb/5.3.204-213 ↗
11. 11 M. Pointner, P. Kuttner, T. Obrlik, A. Jäger and H. Kahr, Agron. Res., 12, 391 (2014)
12. 12 A. Shariff, N. S. M. Aziz, N. I. Ismail and N. Abdullah, J. Phys. Sci., 27, 123 (2016), https://doi.org/10.21315/jps2016.27.2.910.21315/jps2016.27.2.9 ↗
13. 13 Z. Zhang, in "Waste to Renewable Biohydrogen", edited by Q. Zhang, C. He, J. Ren and M. Goodsite, Academic Press, 2021, pp. 109-122, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821659-0.00004-610.1016/B978-0-12-821659-0.00004-6 ↗
14. 14 D. Elalami and A. Barakat, in "Clean Energy and Resources Recovery", edited by V. Tyagi and K. Aboudi, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 1-24, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85223-4.00008-710.1016/B978-0-323-85223-4.00008-7 ↗
15. 15 R. A. Alexander, G. M. Innasimuthu, S. K. Rajaram, P. M. Jeganathan and S. Chellam Somasundarar, Environ. Progress Sustain. Energ., 39, 13289 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.1328910.1002/ep.13289 ↗
16. 16 S. T. C. L. Ndruru, D. Wahyuningrum, B. Bundjali and I. M. Arcana, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 541, 012017 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/541/1/01201710.1088/1757-899X/541/1/012017 ↗
17. 17 C. I. Soares Rodrigues, J. J. Jackson and M. D. Montross, Ind. Crop. Prod., 92, 165 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.01010.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.010 ↗
18. 18 G. Zhen, and Y. Zhao, "Pollution Control and Resource Recovery", Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017, pp. 181-273, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-811639-5.00005-x10.1016/B978-0-12-811639-5.00005-X ↗
19. 19 A. A. Modenbach and S. E. Nokes, Trans. ASABE, 57, 1187 (2014), https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.57.10046.10.13031/trans.57.10046 ↗
20. 20 P. H. Camani, B. F. Anholon, R. R. Toder and D. S. Rosa, Cellulose, 27, 3591 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03019-710.1007/s10570-020-03019-7 ↗
21. 21 M. Li, Y. L. Cheng, N. Fu, D. Li, B. Adhikari et al., Int. J. Food Eng., 10, 427 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2014-005210.1515/ijfe-2014-0052 ↗
22. 22 H. A. Silvério, W. P. F. Neto, N. O. Dantas and D. Pasquini, Ind. Crop. Prod., 44, 427 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.01410.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.014 ↗
23. 23 S. Winarsih, Food Technol. Halal Sci. J., 1, 16 (2018), https://doi.org/10.22219/fths.v1i1.754310.22219/fths.v1i1.7543 ↗
24. 24 M. Asem, D. N. Jimat, N. H. S. Jafri, W. M. F. W. Nawawi, N. F. M. Azmin et al., J. King Saud University - Eng. Sci., 35, 24 (2023), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.03.003.10.1016/j.jksues.2021.03.003 ↗
25. 25 C. Lobo Gomes, E. Gonclaves, C. A. G. Suarez, D. D. S. Rodrigues and I. C. Montano, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 101 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/celluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.1010.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.10 ↗
26. 26 K. Labidi, M. Zrida, O. Korhonen, M. Borghei and A. H. Hamzaoui, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 52, 701 (2018), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT9-10(2018)/p.701-709.pdf
27. 27 A. Y. Melikoğlu, S. E. Bilek and S. Cesur, Carbohyd. Polym., 215, 330 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.10310.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.103 ↗
28. 28 T. N. Tuan Rohadi, M. J. M. Ridzuan, M. S. Abdul Majid, A. Khasri and M. H. Sulaiman, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 9, 15057 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.10210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.102 ↗
29. 29 C. Trilokesh and K. B. Uppuluri, Sci. Rep., 9, 16709 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53412-x10.1038/s41598-019-53412-x ↗
30. 30 N. D. Vu, H. T. Tran, N. D. Bui, C. D. Vu and H. V. Nguyen, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2017, 1063695 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/106369510.1155/2017/1063695 ↗
31. 31 N. Mehta, S. Jeyapriya, P. Kumar, A. K. Verma, P. Umaraw et al., Foods, 11, 2973 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/foods1119297310.3390/foods11192973 ↗
32. 32 P. Penjumras, R. B. Abdul Rahman, R. A. Talib and K. Abdan, Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc., 2, 237 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.03410.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.034 ↗
33. 33 F. Khan, 2021, Bulkperoxide, accessed at: < https://bulkperoxide.com/is-it-safe-to-heat-hydrogen-peroxide/> [Accessed 03 October 2022]
34. 34 B. Pereira and V. Arantes, in "Advances in Sugarcane Biorefnery", edited by A. K. Chandel and M. H. L. Silveira, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 179-196, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804534-3.00016-110.1016/B978-0-12-804534-3.00016-1 ↗
35. 35 Y. Li, Q. Fu, S. Yu, M. Yan and L. Berglund, Biomacromolecules, 17, 1358 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0014510.1021/acs.biomac.6b00145 ↗
36. 36 Z. Qiu, Z. Xiao, L. Gao, J. Li, H. Wang et al., Compos. Sci. Technol., 172, 43 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.005 ↗
37. 37 Y. Wu, J. Wu, F. Yang, C. Tang and Q. Huang, Polymers, 11, 776 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1105077610.3390/polym11050776 ↗
38. 38 J. Su, H. Zhu, L. Wang, X. Liu, S. Nie et al., BioResources, 11, 7416 (2016), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.7416-743010.15376/biores.11.3.7416-7430 ↗
39. 39 X. Huang, C. F. De Hoop, F. Li, J. Xie, C. Y. Hse et al., J. Nanomater., 2017, 4049061 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/404906110.1155/2017/4049061 ↗
40. 40 T. Chanadee and S. Chaiyarat, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 7, 2369 (2016)
41. 41 S. Singh and A. N. Sawarkar, Chemical Product and Process Modeling, 16, 117 (2020), https://10.1515/cppm-2020-004810.1515/cppm-2020-0048 ↗
42. 42 A. A. Rentizelas, "Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy and Biorefining", Amsterdam, Netherland, Elsevier Inc., 2016, pp. 127-146, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-366-9.00006-X10.1016/B978-1-78242-366-9.00006-X ↗
43. 43 Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), "Fiber (Acid Detergent) and Lignin in Animal Feed (973.18)", 1990, 15th Edition, Washington DC
44. 44 Y. Davoudpour, S. Hossain, H. P. S. Abdul Khalil, M. K. Mohamad Haafiz, Z. A. Mohd Ishak et al., Ind. Crop. Prod., 74, 381 (2015), https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.05.02910.1016/j.indcrop.2015.05.029 ↗
45. 45 E. G. Bacha, South Afr. J. Chem. Eng., 40, 176 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2022.03.00310.1016/j.sajce.2022.03.003 ↗
46. 46 D. Ciftci, R. A. Flores and M. D. A. Saldaña, J. Polym. Environ., 26, 2773 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1164-510.1007/s10924-017-1164-5 ↗
47. 47 B. Bennehalli, R. P. G. Ranganadowda and S. S. Kamath, Mater. Sci. Res. India, 16, 86 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/msri.16011210.13005/msri/160112 ↗
48. 48 C. L. Waters, R. R. Janupala, R. G. Mallinson and L. L. Lobban, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 126, 3890 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.05.00810.1016/j.jaap.2017.05.008 ↗
49. "