journal article·2025-05-16Open access

EFFECT OF LIGNOCELLULOSIC FILLER ON MECHANICAL AND RHEOLOGICAL PROPERITES OF ALGINATE-BASED DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS

Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, MUHAMMAD AMER KHAN, NAWSHAD MUHAMMAD, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, SAAD LIAQAT, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, ADNAN KHAN, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, HUMAIRA JABEEN, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, HASHAM KHAN, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, SUMBAL ANWAR, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 59· Issue 3-4

Abstract

Dental alginate impression materials have some disadvantages, such as poor dimensional stability due to syneresis and imbibition, fast setting time in a hot environment, low tensile resistance and poor rheological properties. In this study, lignocellulosic material was incorporated as a filler into commercially available alginate impression material. The powder was mixed in different ratios (2%, 4%, and 6%) to prepare different experimental materials (E1, E2, and E3, respectively). The samples were tested to evaluate their dimensional stability, setting time, tensile strength and rheological properties. The dimensional stability significantly increased by the addition of lignocellulosic powder (2%, 4%) to alginate, as compared to control groups. However, the addition of 6% lignocellulosic powder decreased the dimensional stability, as compared to the control. Also, the mean values of setting time, tensile strength and viscoelasticity were the highest in E3 series, followed by E2 and the least in the control groups. The mean value of the flow and drip properties was reduced statistically by adding increasing concentrations of lignocellulosic powder to alginate. Thus, the addition of lignocellulosic powder to alginate impression material improved the dimensional stability, tensile strength, setting time, viscoelasticity, but reduced the flow properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polysaccharides Composition and Applications · Enzyme Production and Characterization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 G. Cervino, L. Fiorillo, A. S. Herford, L. Laino, G. Troiano et al., Mar. Drugs, 17, 1 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3390/md1701001810.3390/md17010018 ↗
2. 2 S. Mousavi, M. Rahbar, F. Rostamzadeh, K. Jafaria and S. Hekmatfar, Pesqui. Bras. Odontoped. Clín. Integr., 19, 137 (2019), https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.6010.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.60 ↗
3. 3 M. E. Sayed and P. Gangadharappa, Indian J. Dent. Res., 29, 477 (2018), https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_426_1710.4103/ijdr.IJDR_426_17 ↗
4. 4 Z. Raszewski, A. Nowakowska-Toporowska, J. Weżgowiec and D. Nowakowska, Dent. Med. Probl., 55, 43 (2018), https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/8217910.17219/dmp/82179 ↗
5. 5 G. K. Choudhury, R. Chitumalla, L. Manual, S. K. Rajalbandi, M. S. Chauhan et al., J. Contemp. Dent. Pract., 19, 113 (2018), https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-222210.5005/jp-journals-10024-2222 ↗
6. 6 S. Aalaei, R. Ganj-Khanloo and F. Gholami, J. Dent. (Tehran), 14, 31 (2017), https://doi.org/10.5455/ijhrs.00000004810.5455/ijhrs.000000048 ↗
7. 7 U. Shafiq, S. Rahim, A. Saleem and M. Anwari, Pak. Oral Dent. J., 36, 495 (2016), http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60108-X10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60108-X ↗
8. 8 M. P. Walker, J. Burckhard, D. A. Mitts and K. B. Williams, Angle Orthod., 80, 1110 (2010), http://doi.org/10.2319/031510-150.110.2319/031510-150.1 ↗
9. 9 S. Gouveia, L. A. Otero, C. Fernández-Costas, D. Filgueira, Á. Sanromán et al., Polymers, 10, 642 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1006064210.3390/polym10060642 ↗
10. 10 F. H. Isikgor and C. R. Becer, Polym. Chem., 6, 4497 (2015), http://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY00263J10.1039/C5PY00263J ↗
11. 11 D. N. Barmana, M. A. Haquea, T. H. Kang, G. H. Kim, T. Y. Kim et al., Environ. Technol., 35, 232 (2014), http://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.82400910.1080/09593330.2013.824009 ↗
12. 12 M. P. Walker, J. Burckhard, D. A. Mitts and K. B. Williams, Angle Orthod., 80, 1110 (2010), http://doi.org/10.2319/031510-150.110.2319/031510-150.1 ↗
13. 13 M. P. Walker, J. Burckhard, D. A. Mitts and K. B. Williams, Angle Orthod., 80, 1110 (2010), http://doi.org/10.2319/031510-150.110.2319/031510-150.1 ↗
14. 14 A. Fayaz and A. Noori, J. Dent. Sch., 34, 28 (2016), https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v34i1.24686
15. 15 J. Barr and R. J. Bowen, J. Dent. Mater., 34, 28 (2016), http://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1968.036910.14219/jada.archive.1968.0369 ↗
16. 16 Z. J. Zhang, H.-M. Li, S.-Q. Sun, L.-Q. Huang and I. Noda, J. Anal. Lett., 46, 2597 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2013.80541410.1080/00032719.2013.805414 ↗
17. 17 Y. Liu, J. Li, G. Fan, S. Sun, Y. Zhang et al., Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 1124, 180 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.02.03510.1016/j.molstruc.2016.02.035 ↗
18. 18 K. Vernon-Parry, Instrum. Viewpoint, 13, 40 (2000), http://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-1290(00)80006-X10.1016/S0961-1290(00)80006-X ↗
19. 19 H. Orelma, A. Tanaka, M. Vuoriluoto, A. Khakalo and A. Korpela, Wood Sci. Technol., 55, 331 (2021), http://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-021-01265-x10.1007/s00226-021-01265-x ↗
20. 20 V. V. Nandini, K. V. Venkatesh and K. C. Nair, J. Conserv. Dent., 11, 37 (2008), http://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.4341610.4103/0972-0707.43416 ↗
21. 21 H. S. Kim, C. G. Lee and E. Y. Lee, Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng., 16, 843 (2011), http://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-011-0352-810.1007/s12257-011-0352-8 ↗
22. 22 H. S. Kim, C. G. Lee and E. Y. Lee, Eng. Biol., 16, 843 (2011), http://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.19701210.4103/1119-3077.197012 ↗
23. 23 A. R. B. de Olival, N. L. da Penha Júnior, J. V. F. Câmara, A. C. C. D. Simões, J. R. E. V. dos Santos et al., Sci. J. Dent., 6, 37 (2018), http://doi.org/10.3390/dj603003710.3390/dj6030037 ↗
24. 24 N. Aoyama, I. Hayakawa, N. Akiba and S. Minakuchi, Prosthodont. Res. Pract., 6, 239 (2007), http://doi.org/10.2186/prp.6.23910.2186/prp.6.239 ↗
25. 25 M. M. Kulkarni and R. U. Thombare, J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 9, 98 (2015), http://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13627.640710.7860/JCDR/2015/13627.6407 ↗
26. 26 C. Halim, A. Cahyanto, S. Sriwidodo and Z. Harsatiningsih, in Procs. AIP Conf. Proc., AIP Publishing, 2018, http://doi.org/10.1063/1.502122110.1063/1.5021221 ↗
27. 27 B. Thalib, N. Hamrun, M. D. Utama, E. Machmud, S. Arpa et al., Mater. Today Proc., 3, 100 (2020), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpsp.2020.10010510.1016/j.mcpsp.2020.100105 ↗
28. 28 A. J. W. Phillips, "Phillips' Science of Dental Materials", Saunders, 2003, pp. 41-43, https://medarc.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/phillips-science-of-dental-materials.pdf
29. 29 J. E. Christensen, PhD Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 2020, http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.13331
30. 30 D. J. Indrani and N. J. Matram, J. Dent. Jakarta, 46, 5 (2013), http://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v46.i1.p5-810.20473/j.djmkg.v46.i1.p5-8 ↗
31. 31 P. Bradna and D. Cerna, J. Prosthet. Dent., 96, 443 (2006), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.00610.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.006 ↗
32. 32. B. I. Cohen, M. K. Pagnillo, B. L. Musikant and A. S. Deutsch, J. Prosthodont., 7, 111 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1532-849X.1998.TB00189.X10.1111/j.1532-849X.1998.tb00189.x ↗
33. 33 R. M. Abdelraouf, R. E. Bayoumi and T. M. Hamdy, Polymers, 13, 2923 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1317292310.3390/polym13172923 ↗
34. 34 S. Anwar, S. Liaqat, R. Ullah, Z. Iqbal, F. Rahman et al., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 29, 602 (2024), http://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2024.239815210.1080/1023666X.2024.2398152 ↗
35. 35 S. Sastrodihardjo and K. I. Harahap, J. Mater. Kedokt., 7, 33 (2018), http://doi.org/10.32793/jmkg.v7i2.37110.32793/jmkg.v7i2.371 ↗
36. 36 H. Malektaj, A. D. Drozdov, E. Fini and J. Christiansen, Constr. Mater., 29, 244 (2024), http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2901024410.3390/molecules29010244 ↗
37. 37 L. Singer and C. Bourauel, Gels, 9, 429 (2023), http://doi.org/10.3390/gels905042910.3390/gels9050429 ↗
38. 38 Z. Raszewski, A. Nowakowska-Toporowska, J. Weżgowiec and D. Nowakowska, Dent. Med. Probl., 55, 43 (2018), http://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/8217910.17219/dmp/82179 ↗
39. 39 G. A. Zarb, R. Jacob and S. Eckert, in "Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients", edited by Boucher C. O., Elsevier India, 2012
40. 40 K. Ginjupalli, R. Alla, T. Shaw, C. Tellapragada, L. K. Gupta et al., Mater. Today Proc., 5, 16258 (2018), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.11710.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.117 ↗
41. 41 K. Ginjupalli, T. Shaw, C. Tellapragada, R. Alla, L. Gupta et al., Dent. Mater., 34, 158 (2018), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.01610.1016/j.dental.2018.03.016 ↗
42. "