Onset Potential for Electrolyte Oxidation and Ni-Rich Cathode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
High-capacity Ni-rich layered metal oxide cathodes are highly desirable to increase the energy density of lithium-ion batteries. However, these materials suffer from poor cycling performance, which is exacerbated by increased cell voltage. We demonstrate here the detrimental effect of ethylene carbonate (EC), a core component in conventional electrolytes, when NMC811 (LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2) is charged above 4.4 V vs Li/Li+─the onset potential for lattice oxygen release. Oxygen loss is enhanced by EC-containing electrolytes─compared to EC-free─and correlates with more electrolyte oxidation/breakdown and cathode surface degradation, which increase concurrently above 4.4 V. In contrast, NMC111 (LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2), which does not release oxygen up to 4.6 V, shows a similar extent of degradation irrespective of the electrolyte. This work highlights the incompatibility between conventional EC-based electrolytes and Ni-rich cathodes (more generally, cathodes that release lattice oxygen such as Li-/Mn-rich and disordered rocksalt cathodes) and motivates further work on wider classes of electrolytes and additives.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 17 Charles Babbage Road, CB3 0FS Cambridge, U.K.
The Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0RA, U.K.
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, U.K.
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Henry Royce Institute · Faraday Institution
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20200474810.1002/adfm.202004748 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-019-0513-010.1038/s41560-019-0513-0 ↗
3. 10.1149/2.1151605jes10.1149/2.1151605jes ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.0c0636310.1021/jacs.0c06363 ↗
5. 10.1149/2.0021707jes10.1149/2.0021707jes ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0481813jes10.1149/2.0481813jes ↗
7. 10.1039/C6CP05276B10.1039/C6CP05276B ↗
8. 10.1149/1.208326710.1149/1.2083267 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0165710.1021/acsenergylett.1c01657 ↗
10. 10.1039/C7EE03122J10.1039/C7EE03122J ↗
11. 10.1149/2.0511814jes10.1149/2.0511814jes ↗
12. 10.1149/2.1111702jes10.1149/2.1111702jes ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.1c2281210.1021/acsami.1c22812 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0192710.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01927 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0230310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02303 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b0807910.1021/acs.jpca.8b08079 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.03710.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.037 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0144010.1021/acsaem.9b01440 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0843310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08433 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.1151902jes10.1149/2.1151902jes ↗
21. 10.1002/batt.20180012610.1002/batt.201800126 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.09110.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.091 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.01510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.015 ↗
24. 10.1149/2.0321613jes10.1149/2.0321613jes ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20190115210.1002/aenm.201901152 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.1051608jes10.1149/2.1051608jes ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0471701jes10.1149/2.0471701jes ↗
28. 10.1149/2.1341702jes10.1149/2.1341702jes ↗
29. 10.48550/arXiv.2205.1046210.48550/arXiv.2205.10462 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10025310.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100253 ↗
31. 10.1039/C9EE02543J10.1039/C9EE02543J ↗
32. 10.1038/ncomms452910.1038/ncomms4529 ↗
33. 10.1149/1.192816910.1149/1.1928169 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10584310.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105843 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20200373810.1002/aenm.202003738 ↗