journal article·2022-01-14Open access

Evaluating the Case for Reduced Precious Metal Catalysts in Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers

McKenzie A. Hubert, Laurie A. King, Thomas F. Jaramillo

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 7· Issue 1

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolyzers are a key technology in decarbonizing hydrogen production. Though the market for PEM electrolyzer systems is growing, there are concerns that the cost and availability of precious metal catalysts utilized in today’s commercial systems can limit deployment. Herein, we show that while the availability of Ir should not impede deployment in the near term, the inelasticity of the Ir commodity price is cause for immediate concern. We emphasize that diversifying catalyst materials, even with other precious metals, can reduce system costs and mitigate supply chain risk. Furthermore, we analyze the trade-offs between catalyst capital cost and catalyst activity for a range of operating conditions (i.e., capacity factor, electricity price). The framework presented herein is a first step toward establishing performance targets (i.e., activity, stability, material cost) for reduced precious metal and non-precious metal catalysts as a function of PEM electrolyzer operating conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, United Kingdom

Manchester Fuel Cell Innovation Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, United Kingdom

SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · National Science Foundation

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Mcwilliams, A. Global Hydrogen Economy: Merchant Hydrogen and Hydrogen Purification Technologies; BBC Research LLC, June 2019; pp 1–147.
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.00310.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 ↗
3. Ruth, M. F.; Jadun, P. N.; Levie, D.; Frew, B. Electrolysis’ Potential Value for Supporting the Electrical Grid. 2019 Fuel Cell Seminar & Energy Exposition, Long Beach, CA, Nov 7, 2019; NREL, 2019.
4. Brelsford, R. BP plans renewable hydrogen production at German refinery, Nov 2020; https://www.ogj.com/refining-processing/refining/operations/article/14187140/bp-plans-renewable-hydrogen-production-at-german-refinery (accessed April 17, 2021).
5. Satyapal, S. 2021 AMR Plenary Session. DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review
6. DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 2021.
7. Mayyas, A.; Ruth, M.; Pivovar, B.; Bender, G.; Wipke, K. Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers, NREL/TP-6A20-72740; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2019.10.2172/1557965 ↗
8. Taibi E. · 2020
9. Stetson, N. H2 Technologies Overview. 2021 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, Washington, DC, Jun 7, 2021; U.S. DOE, 2021.
10. Pivovar, B. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water. 2021 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, Washington, DC, Jun 13, 2021; U.S. DOE, 2021.
11. 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.08.00810.1016/j.coelec.2019.08.008 ↗
12. Road Map to a US Hydrogen Economy; Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association, 2019.
13. 2021 Electricity ATB Technologies and Data Overview; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2021; https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/index (accessed Aug 26, 2021).
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.00610.1016/j.joule.2019.07.006 ↗
15. Hubert, M. Engineering Reduced Precious Metal Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 2021.10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01869 ↗
16. 10.1002/cite.20190010110.1002/cite.201900101 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.0c1568710.1021/acsami.0c15687 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0024610.1021/acsenergylett.1c00246 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41563-020-0788-310.1038/s41563-020-0788-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.17410.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.174 ↗
21. 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.00410.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 ↗
22. Bloxham, L. Pgm Market Report; Johnson Matthey, 2019.
23. 10.1039/c2ra20839c10.1039/c2ra20839c ↗
24. 10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62979-610.1016/S1872-2067(17)62979-6 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.0641805jes10.1149/2.0641805jes ↗
26. Satyapal, S. U.S. Hydrogen Electrolyzer Locations and Capacity, Green Hydrogen Visions for the West Virtual Conference, Nov 18, 2020; Green Hydrogen Coalition, 2020.
27. Shell starts up Europe’s largest PEM green hydrogen electrolyser. Shell Global, Jul 2, 2021; https://www.shell.com/media/news-and-media-releases/2021/shell-starts-up-europes-largest-pem-green-hydrogen-electrolyser.html (accessed Aug 24, 2021).10.1016/S1464-2859(21)00360-6 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41560-019-0407-110.1038/s41560-019-0407-1 ↗
29. Warwick, F. Iridium hits all-time high of $6,000/oz on supply issues, strong demand. S&P Global Platts, Mar 19, 2021; https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/metals/031921-iridium-hits-all-time-high-of-6000oz-on-supply-issues-strong-demand (accessed Apr 18, 2021).
30. Creamer, M. Explosion closes Amplats plant, Sibanye plans using own facilities. Polity, Mar 6, 2020
31. https://www.polity.org.za/article/amplats-smelter-explodes-replacement-shut-to-avoid-another-blast-2020-03-06 (accessed Sept 1, 2021).
32. PGM Price Charts, Johnson Matthey; http://www.platinum.matthey.com/prices/price-charts (accessed Apr 1, 2021).
33. Carmo, M.; Fritz, D. L.; Maier, W.; Stolten, D. Alkaline Water Electrolysis Vs. PEM Water Electrolysis - Exploring Their Full Performance. 227th ECS Meeting, Chicago, IL, May 24–28, 2015; No. 148910.1149/MA2015-01/24/1489 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.07410.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.074 ↗
35. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0247910.1021/acscatal.6b02479 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20160127510.1002/aenm.201601275 ↗
37. 10.1039/C7TA05126C10.1039/C7TA05126C ↗
38. 10.1002/anie.20140645510.1002/anie.201406455 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41467-019-11695-810.1038/s41467-019-11695-8 ↗
40. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0225210.1021/acscatal.0c02252 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41565-019-0550-710.1038/s41565-019-0550-7 ↗
42. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0309810.1021/acscatal.0c03098 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.9b1935210.1021/acsami.9b19352 ↗
44. 10.1149/1945-7111/abdcc910.1149/1945-7111/abdcc9 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.00510.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005 ↗
46. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc74610.1149/1945-7111/abc746 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0233810.1021/acsenergylett.0c02338 ↗