In Situ Optical Imaging of Sodium Electrodeposition: Effects of Fluoroethylene Carbonate
Source abstract
Abstract
The morphologies of sodium electrodeposits and gas evolution were studied in a system comprising a symmetrical Na/Na optical cell, a digital microscope, and an electrochemical workstation. Sodium deposition in ethylene carbonate (EC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), and propylene carbonate (PC) generated large volumes of gas and fragile, porous dendrites. The use of fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) greatly reduced gassing during deposition and demonstrated superior cycling performance, impedance, and cycling efficiency when it was used as a cosolvent with DEC (1:1 vol); however, porous depositions persisted. Time of flight secondary-ion mass spectrometry revealed that the solid-electrolyte interphase formed in FEC/DEC, in contrast with the EC/DEC electrolyte, is thicker, richer in NaF, and forms a less dense polymer organic layer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1589, United States
Texas Materials Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1591, United States
Center for Electrochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin Texas 78712-0165, United States
Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1224, United States
Funding
Welch Foundation · Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/2.0981610jes10.1149/2.0981610jes ↗
2. 10.1149/2.101306jes10.1149/2.101306jes ↗
3. 10.1038/srep2240610.1038/srep22406 ↗
4. 10.1002/advs.20150021310.1002/advs.201500213 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.212885910.1149/1.2128859 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0340310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03403 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00151-710.1016/S0378-7753(98)00151-7 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl504862610.1021/nl5048626 ↗
9. 10.1021/acscentsci.5b0032810.1021/acscentsci.5b00328 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.0091513jes10.1149/2.0091513jes ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.12010.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.120 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6EE01674J10.1039/C6EE01674J ↗
13. 10.1021/acscentsci.6b0026010.1021/acscentsci.6b00260 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms619310.1038/ncomms6193 ↗
15. 10.1149/2.0041502eel10.1149/2.0041502eel ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20160551210.1002/adma.201605512 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0025910.1021/acsenergylett.6b00259 ↗
18. 10.1021/am200973k10.1021/am200973k ↗
19. 10.1039/C3CP53077A10.1039/C3CP53077A ↗
20. 10.1039/C4TA04428B10.1039/C4TA04428B ↗
21. 10.1038/ncomms736210.1038/ncomms7362 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp411101910.1021/jp4111019 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00080-210.1016/S0167-2738(02)00080-2 ↗
24. Bard A. J. · 2001
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.02910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.029 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0475510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04755 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.07.03710.1016/j.elecom.2006.07.037 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00457-510.1016/S0022-0728(00)00457-5 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0132063610.1007/BF01320636 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00603-110.1016/S0378-7753(02)00603-1 ↗
31. 10.1039/C4CP05865H10.1039/C4CP05865H ↗
32. 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00067-610.1016/S0378-7753(98)00067-6 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00431-610.1016/S0378-7753(00)00431-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)02998-W10.1016/0022-0728(93)02998-W ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms848210.1038/ncomms8482 ↗
36. 10.1021/jp310228210.1021/jp3102282 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0162710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01627 ↗
38. 10.1002/cssc.20160135610.1002/cssc.201601356 ↗
39. 10.1149/1.183785810.1149/1.1837858 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0049110.1021/acsenergylett.6b00491 ↗
41. 10.1039/C5CP07583A10.1039/C5CP07583A ↗