journal article·2021-09-10

Integrated Capture and Electroreduction of Flue Gas CO2 to Formate Using Amine Functionalized SnOx Nanoparticles

Yingying Cheng, Jing Hou, Peng Kang

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 6· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Flue gas from fossil fuel combustion contributes significantly to CO2 emissions. Due to the low CO2 concentration and the existence of reactive O2 in the flue gas, direct flue gas CO2 electrochemical conversion is a challenging task. Here we integrated both CO2 capture and electrochemical conversion into CO2 enriching catalysts by grafting alkanolamines on a tin oxide surface, which can electrochemically reduce simulated flue gas (SFG, 15% CO2, 8% O2, 77% N2) to formate. Maximum formate Faradaic efficiency of 84.2% has been reached by diethanolamine modified tin oxide (DEA–SnOx/C) at −0.75 V vs RHE with partial current density of 6.7 mA·cm–2 in 0.5 M KHCO3 under simulated flue gas atmosphere. Surface amino groups not only enrich CO2 locally but also inhibit O2 reduction, and in situ infrared (in situ IR) spectroscopy confirmed that amino groups accelerate CO2 reduction by promoting the formation of key intermediates (OCHO–*).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, 135 Yaguan Rd, Tianjin 300350, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20201195610.1002/anie.202011956 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-020-0667-910.1038/s41560-020-0667-9 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12209-020-00246-810.1007/s12209-020-00246-8 ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20170628010.1002/anie.201706280 ↗
5. 10.1039/C9EE03077H10.1039/C9EE03077H ↗
6. 10.1039/D0EE01834A10.1039/D0EE01834A ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11387910.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113879 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20191300310.1002/anie.201913003 ↗
9. 10.1039/C9CY00506D10.1039/C9CY00506D ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.9b0804810.1021/acsami.9b08048 ↗
11. 10.1021/jp512001t10.1021/jp512001t ↗
12. 10.1038/s41929-020-00547-010.1038/s41929-020-00547-0 ↗
13. 10.1039/C8TA09637F10.1039/C8TA09637F ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20180140010.1002/aenm.201801400 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.6b0287810.1021/jacs.6b02878 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.6b1102310.1021/jacs.6b11023 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20200552210.1002/anie.202005522 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5EE03694A10.1039/C5EE03694A ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20131072210.1002/anie.201310722 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja503152910.1021/ja5031529 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0351410.1021/acs.iecr.7b03514 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja411388510.1021/ja4113885 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja210879910.1021/ja2108799 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20170252410.1002/aenm.201702524 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20180242710.1002/aenm.201802427 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11813410.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118134 ↗
27. 10.1002/ente.20200079910.1002/ente.202000799 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.8b1242810.1021/jacs.8b12428 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20191653810.1002/anie.201916538 ↗
30. 10.1002/chem.20140332110.1002/chem.201403321 ↗
31. 10.1039/C6CY00828C10.1039/C6CY00828C ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20190366410.1002/aenm.201903664 ↗
33. Smith, H. J.; Simons, C. Enzymes and their inhibition drug development; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2005; p 308.
34. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0051610.1021/acsenergylett.8b00516 ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20200309310.1002/anie.202003093 ↗
36. 10.1039/c004106h10.1039/c004106h ↗
37. 10.1021/ja971510510.1021/ja9715105 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0022-3093(96)00419-X10.1016/S0022-3093(96)00419-X ↗
39. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.10933310.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109333 ↗
40. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0434710.1021/acscatal.7b04347 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20201465510.1002/anie.202014655 ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.6b1328710.1021/jacs.6b13287 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20200557710.1002/anie.202005577 ↗
44. 10.1002/adma.20180813510.1002/adma.201808135 ↗