journal article·2024-09-25Open access

ECO-FRIENDLY BIONANOCOMPOSITE BASED ON BIOSYNTHESIZED POLY(3-HYDROXYBUTYRATE-CO-3-HYDROXYVALERATE) REINFORCED WITH Ni-CuO NANOPARTICLES FOR REMOVAL OF BRILLIANT GREEN

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, B.O. Box 80203 Saudi Arabia, MOHAMMAD I. IBRAHIM, KHALID A. ALAMRY, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, B.O. Box 80203 Saudi Arabia, DIYA ALSAFADI, Biocatalysis and Biosynthesis Research Unit, Advanced Research Center, Royal Scientific Society, Amman 11941, Jordan, RAED ALTHOMALI, Department of Chemistry, College of Art and Science, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Al-Dawasir 11991, Saudi Arabia, MOHAMED A. ABDEL-FADEEL, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, B.O. Box 80203 Saudi Arabia, MOHD RAFATULLAH, Division of Environmental Technology, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia, MAHMOUD A. HUSSEIN, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, B.O. Box 80203 Saudi Arabia

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 58· Issue 7-8

Abstract

Ni-doped Copper oxide (Ni-CuO) nanoparticles have been synthesized from Arabic Gum. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) polyester was biosynthesized by the microorganism Haloferax mediterranei utilizing date waste as carbon source. The produced Ni-doped copper oxide (Ni-CuO) nanoparticles have been incorporated with different percentages into the PHBV matrix. The produced bionanocomposites were achieved with different percentages of the nanoparticles: 1%, 3%, 5% and 10%, and were referred to as PHBV/Ni-CuO(1,3,5,10%). FTIR, TGA, XRD, SEM and EDX techniques have been used to study and characterize the synthesized bionanocoposites. In addition, the prepared nanocomposites were studied for their efficiency as solid phase adsorbents for Brilliant Green (B.G.) dye from water resources under different conditions. The prepared nanocomposites were found to be very efficient and promising solid phase adsorbent materials to treat water samples for the purpose of dye removal. The percentage of the removed dye increased from 45.6% to 97.7% as the PHBV/Ni-CuO(10%) nanocomposite amount increased from 10 mg to 70 mg per 25 mL of water sample. The dye removal percentage reached an equilibrium in 90 min. Natural water samples from three different sources have been tested against the Ni-CuO/PHBV(3%) nanocomposite as solid adsorbent for the B.G. removal, and the results showed >90% dye removal in all cases under the optimum experimental conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Pigment Synthesis and Properties · Material Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 E. Bugnicourt, P. Cinelli, A. Lazzeri and V. Alvarez, eXPRESS Polym. Lett., 8, 791 (2014), https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2014.8210.3144/expresspolymlett.2014.82 ↗
2. 2 K. Zhao, Y. Deng, J. C. Chen and G. Q. Chen, Biomaterials, 24, 1041 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00426-x10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00426-X ↗
3. 3 S. Modi, K. Koelling and Y. Vodovotz, Eur. Polym. J., 47, 179 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.11.01010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.11.010 ↗
4. 4 X. Wang, Z. Chen, X. Chen, J. Pan and K. Xu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 117, 838 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3121510.1002/app.31215 ↗
5. 5 H. J. Endres and A. Siebert-Raths, "Engineering Biopolymers Markets, Manufacturing, Properties, and Applications", Munich, Carl Hanser Verlag, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3139/978344643002010.3139/9783446430020 ↗
6. 6 M. Larsson, O. Markbo and P. Jannasch, RSC Adv., 6, 44354 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA06282B10.1039/C6RA06282B ↗
7. 7 Y. X. Weng, Y. Wang, X. L. Wang and Y. Z. Wang, Polym. Test., 29, 579 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.04.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.04.002 ↗
8. 8 M. Avella, E. Martuscelli and M. Raimo, J. Mater. Sci., 35, 523 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100474052275110.1023/A:1004740522751 ↗
9. 9 P. B. Malafaya, G. A. Silva and R. L. Reis, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 59, 207 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.01210.1016/j.addr.2007.03.012 ↗
10. 10 C. S. Ha and W. J. Cho, Prog. Polym. Sci., 27, 759 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00050-810.1016/S0079-6700(01)00050-8 ↗
11. 11 B. S. Thorat Gadgil, N. Killi and G. V. N. Rathna, Medchemcomm, 8, 1774 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MD00252A10.1039/C7MD00252A ↗
12. 12 Z. Li, J. Yang and X. J. Loh NPG Asia Mater., 8, e265 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2016.4810.1038/am.2016.48 ↗
13. 13 M. I. Ibrahim, D. Alsafadi, K. A. Alamry and M. A. Hussein, J. Polym. Environ., 2021, 1010 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01946-x10.1007/s10924-020-01946-x ↗
14. 14 J. Lim, M. You, J. Li and Z. Li, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 79, 917 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.13210.1016/j.msec.2017.05.132 ↗
15. 15 R. Dwivedi, R. Pandey, S. Kumar and D. Mehrotra, J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res., 10, 389 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.00410.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.004 ↗
16. 16 J. Zhang, E. I. Shishatskaya, T. G. Volova, L. F. da Silva and G. Q. Chen, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 86, 144 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.03510.1016/j.msec.2017.12.035 ↗
17. 17 J. L. C. Mayorga, M. J. F. Rovira, L. C. Mas, G. S. Moragas and J. M. L. Cabello, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 135, 45673 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4567310.1002/app.45673 ↗
18. 18 K. Mazur, R. Singh, R. P. Friedrich, H. Genç, H. Unterweger et al., Macromol. Mater. Eng., 305, 2000244 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20200024410.1002/mame.202000244 ↗
19. 19 N. Salahuddin, M. Gaber, M. Mousa and M. A. Abdelwahab, RSC Adv., 10, 34046 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA04784H10.1039/D0RA04784H ↗
20. 20 A. H. Mahvi, M. Malakootian and M. R. Heidari, J. Water Chem. Technol., 33, 377 (2011), https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X1106005110.3103/S1063455X11060051 ↗
21. 21 M. Malakootian, N. Radhakrishna, M. P. Mazandarany and H. Hossaini, Desalin. Water Treat., 51, 4478 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.76966810.1080/19443994.2013.769668 ↗
22. 22 X. Zheng, Z. Zhang, D. Yu, X. Chen, R. Cheng et al., Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 105, 1 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.01210.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.012 ↗
23. 23 V. Singh, A. Tiwari and M. Das, Fuel, 173, 90 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.03110.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.031 ↗
24. 24 S. Natarajan, H. C. Bajaj and R. J. Tayade, J. Environ. Sci., 65, 201 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.01110.1016/j.jes.2017.03.011 ↗
25. 25 E. A. Dil, M. Ghaedi, A. M. Ghaedi, A. Asfaram, A. Goudarzi et al., J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 34, 186 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.11.01010.1016/j.jiec.2015.11.010 ↗
26. 26 A. Ayach, S. Fakhi, Z. Faiz, A. Bouih, O. Ait Malek et al., Chem. Int., 3, 442 (2017)
27. 27 M. Abbas, M. Adil, S. Ehtisham-ul-Haque, B. Munir, M. Yameen et al., Sci. Total Environ., 626, 1295 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.06610.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.066 ↗
28. 28 S. de Gisi, G. Lofrano, M. Grassi and M. Notarnicola, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 9, 10 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.00210.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.002 ↗
29. 29 Y. Zhang, B. Wu and H. Xu, NanoImpact, 3-4, 22 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2016.09.00410.1016/j.impact.2016.09.004 ↗
30. 30 M. Iqbal, M. Abbas and A. Nazir, Chem. Int., 5, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475399
31. 31 M. Malakootian, A. Nasiri, A. Asadipour and E. Kargar, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 129, 138 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.02210.1016/j.psep.2019.06.022 ↗
32. 32 R. Saravanan, V. K. Gupta, V. Narayanan and A. Stephen, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 1910 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.12.02110.1016/j.jtice.2013.12.021 ↗
33. 33 A. Kausar, M. Iqbal and A. Javed, J. Mol. Liq., 256, 395 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.02.03410.1016/j.molliq.2018.02.034 ↗
34. 34 V. Katheresan, J. Kansedo and S. Y. Lau, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6, 4676 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.06010.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 ↗
35. 35 A. F. S. Costa, C. D. C. Albuquerque, A. A. Salgueiro and L. A. Sarubbo, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 118, 203 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.00110.1016/j.psep.2018.03.001 ↗
36. 36 B. Bharathiraja, I. A. E. Selvakumari, J. Iyyappan and S. Varjani, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health, 12, 6 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.07.00410.1016/j.coesh.2019.07.004 ↗
37. 37 A. Saravanan, R. Jayasree and R. V. Hemavathy, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 7, 103052 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.10305210.1016/j.jece.2019.103052 ↗
38. 38 T. R. Sahoo and B. Prelot, Micro Nano Technol., 2020, 161 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818489-9.00007-410.1016/B978-0-12-818489-9.00007-4 ↗
39. 39 M. A. El-Ghobashy, I. A. Salem, W. M. El-Dahrawy and M. A. Salem, J. Mol. Struct., 1272, 134118 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.13411810.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134118 ↗
40. 40 M. El-Sakhawy, A. Salama, A. K. El-Ziaty and H. Hassan, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 54, 601 (2020), https://doi.org/10.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2020.54.6010.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.60 ↗
41. 41 S. Moosavi, S. Gan and S. Zakaria, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 53, 815 (2019), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.8010.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.80 ↗
42. 42 Rajapaksha, R. Orrell-Trigg, Y. B. Truong, D. Cozzolino, V. Truong et al., Environ. Sci. Adv., 1, 456 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1039/D2VA00059H10.1039/D2VA00059H ↗
43. 43 H. Khawaja, E. Zahir, M. A. Asghar and M. A. Asghar, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 167, 23 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.13710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.137 ↗
44. 44 D. Alsafadi, M. I. Ibrahim, K. A. Alamry, M. A. Hussein and A. Mansour, Sci. Total Environ., 737, 139716 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13971610.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139716 ↗
45. 45 Z. Marczenko, "Separation and Spectrophotometric Determination of Elements", 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1986
46. 46 R. Naphade and J. Jog, Fibers Polym., 13, 692 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-0692-910.1007/s12221-012-0692-9 ↗
47. 47 L. M. Dwivedi, N. Shukla, K. Baranwal, S. Gupta, S. Siddique et al., J. Cluster Sci., 32, 209 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-020-01779-710.1007/s10876-020-01779-7 ↗
48. 48 S. Vidhate, L. Innocentini-Mei and N. A. D'Souza, Polym. Eng. Sci., 10, 1357 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2308410.1002/pen.23084 ↗
49. 49 S. A. Dastgheib and D. A. Rockstraw, Carbon, 40, 1853 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00036-210.1016/S0008-6223(02)00036-2 ↗
50. 50 H. M. Al-Saidi, M. A. Abdel-Fadeel, A. Z. El-Sonbati and A. A. El-Bindary, J. Mol. Liq., 216, 693 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.08610.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.086 ↗
51. 51 W. J. Weber, J. C. Morris and J. Sanit, Eng. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 89, 31 (1963)10.1061/JSEDAI.0000430 ↗
52. 52 R. C. Dalal, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 5, 531 (1974), https://doi.org/10.1080/0010362740936653110.1080/00103627409366531 ↗
53. 53 A. K. Bhattacharya and C. Venkobachar, J. Environ. Eng., 110, 1 (1984), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1984)110:1(110)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1984)110:1(110) ↗
54. 54 H. M. Al-Saidi, M. A. Abdel-Fadeel and S. S. Alharthi, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 25, 101301 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2021.10130110.1016/j.jscs.2021.101301 ↗
55. 55 R. H. Althomali, K. A. Alamry, M. A. Hussein, A. Khan, S. S. Al-Juaid et al., Int. J. Environ. Analyt. Chem., 102, 3673 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.177277210.1080/03067319.2020.1772772 ↗
56. 56 M. A. Abdel-Fadeel, N. S. Aljohani, S. R. Al-Mhyawi, R. F. Halawani, E. H. Aljuhani et al., J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 26, 101475 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2022.10147510.1016/j.jscs.2022.101475 ↗
57. "