UTILISATION OF CONICAL PRICKLES OF BOMBAX CEIBA BARK FOR MULTIFUNCTIONAL MOSQUITO REPELLENT COLOURATION OF COTTON
Source abstract
Abstract
"The development of novel routes for the production of functional textiles is an urgent need. Natural dyes are a safe and sustainable choice for the colouration of textiles. To achieve the colouration of textiles with natural dyes, mordanting methods have been highly explored; the present work targets the functional natural dyeing of cotton by the in-situ development of azoic dye. The paper discusses a new application approach of a novel natural dye (derived from conical prickles of Bombax ceiba bark) to cotton using mosquito repellent ethyl anthranilate. The dye obtained from the extract of Bombax ceiba bark conical prickles (CPBCE) was further converted into azoic dye by reacting it with diazotised ethyl anthranilate. The developed coloured cotton fabric was endowed with mosquito repellence, antibacterial action, and UV protection. The colouration properties and fastness of dyed samples were examined using standard methods. Moreover, the dyed samples were also characterised using TGA (thermogravimetric analysis) and XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis. Thus, 100% mosquito repellent properties, good antibacterial protection, and excellent UV protection were imparted to cotton."
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Insect Utilization and Effects · Skin Protection and Aging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 M. Mohsin, A. Farooq, U. Ashraf, M. A. Ashraf, N. Abbas et al., J. Nat. Fibers, 13, 374 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2015.105503110.1080/15440478.2015.1055031 ↗
2. 2 R. Naveed, I. A. Bhatti, S. Adeel, A. Ashar, I. Sohail et al., J. Nat. Fibers., 19, 248 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.173830910.1080/15440478.2020.1738309 ↗
3. 3 M. Verma, N. Gahlot, S. S. J. Singh and N. M. Rose, Carbohyd. Polym., 257, 117612 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11761210.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117612 ↗
4. 4 J. Sheikh, P. S. Jagtap and M. D. Teli, Fibers Polym., 17, 738 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-016-5031-010.1007/s12221-016-5031-0 ↗
5. 5 M. Verma, N. Gahlot, S. S. J. Singh and N. M. Rose, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 343 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.3310.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.33 ↗
6. 6 F. Yılmaz and M. İ. Bahtiyari, J. Clean. Prod., 270, 122068 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12206810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122068 ↗
7. 7 K. Phan, E. Van Den Broeck, V. Van Speybroeck, K. De Clerck, K. Raes et al., Dyes Pigm., 176, 108180 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.10818010.1016/j.dyepig.2019.108180 ↗
8. 8 Y. Ren, R. Fu, K. Fang, W. Chen, L. Hao et al., Ind. Crop. Prod., 142, 111863 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11186310.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111863 ↗
9. 9 A. Singh and J. Sheikh, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 9642 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.199018110.1080/15440478.2021.1990181 ↗
10. 10 O. Akaranta and D. E. Efanga, J. Natl. Sci. Counc. Sri Lanka, 25, 121 (1997), https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v25i2.502610.4038/jnsfsr.v25i2.5026 ↗
11. 11 N. Punrattanasin, Adv. Mater. Res., 279, (2011), https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.331.27910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.331.279 ↗
12. 12 N. Vuthiganond, M. Nakpathom and R. Mongkholrattanasit, Fibers Polym., 21, 1052 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-9057-y10.1007/s12221-020-9057-y ↗
13. 13 P. Chaudhary and S. Khadabadi, Pharmacogn. Commun., 2, O2 (2012), https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2012.3.210.5530/pc.2012.3.2 ↗
14. 14 V. Jain and S. K. Verma, Indian J. Tradit. Knowl., 13, 87 (2014), https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/26029
15. 15 T. O. Vieira, A. Said, E. Aboutabl, M. Azzam and T. B. Creczynski-Pasa, Redox Rep., 14, 41 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1179/135100009X39248510.1179/135100009X392485 ↗
16. 16 V. G. Digge, K. Sonali, H. G. Maheshwar, B. N. Poul and R. Jange Dhanraj, Am. J. Phytomed. Clin. Ther., 3, 551 (2015), https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=3141e59f356a3abc05edf66acf0457af1e4e5016
17. 17 K. Anandarajagopal, J. A. J. Sunilson, T. V. Ajaykumar, R. Ananth and S. Kamal, Eur. J. Med. Plants, 3, 99 (2013), https://doi.org/10.9734/ejmp/2013/211310.9734/EJMP/2013/2113 ↗
18. 18 M. H. Rahman, M. A. Rashid and T. A. Chowdhury, Bangladesh Pharm. J., 22, 219 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3329/bpj.v22i2.4231310.3329/bpj.v22i2.42313 ↗
19. 19 Y. J. You, N. H. Nam, Y. Kim, K. H. Bae and B. Z. Ahn, Phyther. Res., 17, 341 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.114010.1002/ptr.1140 ↗
20. 20 C. J. Bhavsar and G. S. Talele, Bangladesh J. Pharmacol., 8, 102 (2013), https://doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v8i2.1370110.3329/bjp.v8i2.13701 ↗
21. 21 A. H. M. Khurshid Alam, R. Sharmin, M. Islam, M. H. Hasan Joarder, M. M. Alamgir et al., J. Nutr. Heal. Food Sci. 6, 1 (2018), https://doi.org/10.15226/jnhfs.2018.00114010.15226/jnhfs.2018.001140 ↗
22. 22 S. Zikr-ur-Rehman, M. A. Versiani, R. Saleem, F. Sadaf, A. Azmat et al., Chem. Nat. Compd., 55, 939 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-019-02853-x10.1007/s10600-019-02853-x ↗
23. 23 J. Sichaem, K. Inthanon, N. Funnimid, K. Phontree, H. V. T. Phan et al., Chem. Nat. Compd., 56, 909 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-020-03183-z10.1007/s10600-020-03183-z ↗
24. 24 J. Sheikh, N. Singh and M. Srivastava, Fibers Polym., 20, 312 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-8294-410.1007/s12221-019-8294-4 ↗
25. 25 G. Singh, P. Mathur, N. Singh and J. Sheikh, Sustain. Chem. Pharm., 14, 100184 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2019.10018410.1016/j.scp.2019.100184 ↗
26. 26 M. Gupta, J. Sheikh and A. Singh, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 97, 383 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.02.02310.1016/j.jiec.2021.02.023 ↗
27. 27 J. Islam, K. Zaman, V. Tyagi, S. Duarah, S. Dhiman et al., Acta Trop., 174, 56 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.02410.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.024 ↗
28. 28 S. Sarkar and A. T. Khan, Chem. Commun., 51, 12673 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cc03369a10.1039/C5CC03369A ↗
29. 29 A. B. Mapossa, A. Sitoe, W. W. Focke, H. Izadi, E. L. du Toit et al., Pest Manag. Sci., 76, 1112 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.562310.1002/ps.5623 ↗
30. 30 J. Islam, K. Zaman, S. Duarah, P. S. Raju and P. Chattopadhyay, Acta Trop., 167, 216 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.12.03110.1016/j.actatropica.2016.12.031 ↗
31. 31 A. Singh and J. Sheikh, J. Mol. Struct., 1232, 129988 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.12998810.1016/j.molstruc.2021.129988 ↗
32. 32 ISO Technical Manual, 2006, Switzerland, Geneva, https://www.iso.org/home.html
33. 33 A. Singh and J. Sheikh, Carbohyd. Polym., 290, 119466 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11946610.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119466 ↗
34. 34 AS/NZS, 4399.1996.1996-AS/NZS 4399. Sun protective clothing evaluation and classification
35. 35 AATCC Technical Manual, Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Research Triangle Park, 2007
36. 36 N. Kahkeshani, F. Farzaei, M. Fotouhi, S. S. Alavi, R. Bahramsoltani et al., Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci., 22, 225 (2019), https://doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2019.32806.7897
37. "