EXTRACTION AND CHARACTERISATION OF CELLULOSE FROM RED SEAWEEDS OF Hypnea musciformis AND Sarconima filliformis
Source abstract
Abstract
The study shows a comparison of cellulose extracted from two species of red seaweeds, namely Hypnea musciformis and Sarconima filliformis. The celluloses were characterized by FTIR, XRD, TGA and SEM analyses. The studies show similarities in the characteristics of the celluloses extracted from H. musciformis and S. filliformis. FTIR analysis confirms the presence of O-H and C-H bonds in the celluloses of both species, while the XRD patterns of celluloses confirm their crystallinity, with a maximum peak at 22°. The thermal stability of the celluloses from H. musciformis and S. filliformis was observed in the range of 250 to 350 °C. The morphological structure of the celluloses was studied using SEM and both celluloses showed smooth pore-free surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 M. G. Mehrabani, R. Karimian, B. Mehramouz, M. Rahimi and H. S. Kafil, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 114, 961 (2018), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.12810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.128 ↗
2. 2 M. G. Mehrabani, R. Karimian, R. Rakhshaei, F. Pakdel, H. Eslami et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 116, 966 (2018), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.10210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.102 ↗
3. 3 B. Chan and K. Leong, Eur. Spine J., 17, 467 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0745-310.1007/s00586-008-0745-3 ↗
4. 4 S. Sadreddini, R. Safaralizadeh, B. Baradaran, L. Aghebati-Maleki, M. A. Hosseinpour Feizi et al., Immunol. Lett., 181, 79 (2018), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2016.11.01310.1016/j.imlet.2016.11.013 ↗
5. 5 A. Sionkowska, Prog. Polym. Sci., 36, 1254 (2011), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.003 ↗
6. 6 T. Ozawa, D. A. Mickle, R. D. Weisel, N. Koyama, S. Ozawa et al., Circulation, 106, 176 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000032901.55215.cc10.1161/01.cir.0000032901.55215.cc ↗
7. 7 L. M. Cross, A. Thakur, N. A. Jalili, M. Detamore and A. K. Gaharwar, Acta Biomater., 42, 2 (2016), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.02310.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.023 ↗
8. 8 M. S. Zafar, A. A. Alnazzawi, M. Alrahabi, M. A. Fareed, S. Najeeb et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20, 5960 (2019), http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2023596010.3390/ijms20235960 ↗
9. 9 S. Raveendran, A. K. Rochani, T. Maekawa and D. S. Kumar, Materials, 10, 929 (2013), http://doi.org/10.3390/ma1008092910.3390/ma10080929 ↗
10. 10 S. Gustafson, Glycobiology, 7, 1209 (1997), http://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/7.8.120910.1093/glycob/7.8.1209 ↗
11. 11 C. R. Parish, C. Freeman, K. J. Brown, D. J. Francis and W. B. Cowden, Cancer Res., 15, 3433 (1999)
12. 12 L. S. Costa, G. P. Fidelis, S. L. Cordeiro, R. M. Oliveira, D. A. Sabry et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 12, 3352 (2011), http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1205335210.3390/ijms12053352 ↗
13. 13 R. Jayakumar, D. M. Manzoor, S. V. Nair and H. Tamura, Carbohyd. Polym., 82, 227 (2010), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.07410.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.074 ↗
14. 14 T. Heinze and T. Liebert, Prog. Polym. Sci., 26, 16 (2001), http://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00022-310.1016/S0079-6700(01)00022-3 ↗
15. 15 D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H. P. E. Habil and A. Bohan, J. German Chem. Soc., 44, 3358 (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
16. 16 M. Q. Zhang, Express Polym. Lett., 1, 406 (2007), http://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.5710.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.57 ↗
17. 17 L. Yan, W. Li, Z. Qi and S. Liu, J. Polym. Res., 13, 375 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-006-9054-x10.1007/s10965-006-9054-x ↗
18. 18 A. Biswas, R. L. Shogren and J. L. Willett, Biomacromolecules, 6, 1843 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050175710.1021/bm0501757 ↗
19. 19 D. G. Yu, J. H. Yu, L. Chen, G. R. Williams and X. Wang, Carbohyd. Polym., 90, 1016 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.03610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.036 ↗
20. 20 D. G. Yu, X. Y. Li, X. Wang, W. Chian, Y. Z. Liao et al., Cellulose, 20, 379 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9824-z10.1007/s10570-012-9824-z ↗
21. 21 M. Ilangovan, V. K. Guna, H. Chunyan, G. S. Nagananda and N. Reddy, Ind. Crop. Prod., 112, 556 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.04210.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.042 ↗
22. 22 S. G. Jebadurai, R. E. Raj, V. S. Sreenivasan and J. S. Binoj, Carbohyd. Polym., 207, 675 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.027 ↗
23. 23 M. Kathirselvam, A. Kumaravel, V. P. Arthanarieswaran and S. S. Saravanakumar, Carbohyd. Polym., 212, 439 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.072 ↗
24. 24 N. Reddy and Y. Yang, Bioresour. Technol., 100, 3563 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.04710.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.047 ↗
25. 25 C. S. R. Freire, S. C. M. Fernandes, A. J. D. Silvestre and C. Pascoal Neto, Holzforschung, 67, 603 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2012-012710.1515/hf-2012-0127 ↗
26. 26 J. Shojaeiarani, D. S. Bajwa and S. Chanda, Compos. Part C, 5, 100164 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10016410.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100164 ↗
27. 27 Q. He, Q. Wang, H. Zhou, R. Dandan, H. Yunhai et al., Cellulose, 25, 5523 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1966-110.1007/s10570-018-1966-1 ↗
28. 28 K. Santhanam, A. Kumaravel, S. S. Saravanakumar and V. P. Arthanarieswaran, Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact., 21, 267 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2016.114765410.1080/1023666X.2016.1147654 ↗
29. 29 A. Trivedi, P. S. Mavi, D. Bhatt and A. Kumar, Nat. Commun., 7, 11392 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1139210.1038/ncomms11392 ↗
30. 30 I. Manikandan, G. Vijaykumar, B. Prajwal, J. Qiuran and R. Narendra, Carbohyd. Polym., 236, 115996 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11599610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115996 ↗
31. 31 S. Y. Nair, F. Nauer and C. O. Mariana, J. Appl. Phycol., 32, 3585 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02209-x10.1007/s10811-020-02209-x ↗
32. 32 M. Szymanska-Chargot, M. Chylinska, K. Gdula, A. Koziol and A. Zdunek, Polymers (Basel), 9, 495 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fpolym910049510.3390/polym9100495 ↗
33. 33 A. K. Siddhantaa, K. Prasad, R. Meena, P. Gayatri, G. K. Mehta et al., Bioresour. Technol., 100, 6669 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.04710.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.047 ↗
34. 34 N. Wahlström, U. Edlund, H. Pavia, T. Gunilla, J. Alaksander et al., Cellulose, 27, 3707 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03029-510.1007/s10570-020-03029-5 ↗
35. 35 A. K. Siddhanta, K. Sanjay, G. K. Mehta, M. U. Chhatbara, M. D. Oza et al., Nat. Prod. Commun., 8, 497 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X130080042310.1177/1934578X1300800423 ↗
36. 36 A. K. Siddhanta, K. Sanjay, G. K. Mehta, M. U. Chhatbara, M. D. Oza et al., J. Appl. Phycol., 23, 919 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9599-210.1007/s10811-010-9599-2 ↗
37. 37 G. F. El-Said and A. El-Sikaily, Environ. Monit. Assess., 7, 6089 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-3009-y10.1007/s10661-012-3009-y ↗
38. 38 M. S. A. S. Dalia and M. Mona Ismail, Egypt. J. Aqua. Res., (in press) (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2021.11.00110.1016/j.ejar.2021.11.001 ↗
39. 39 M. D. Archana, A. A. Abdul and M. P. Hazarika, Carbohyd. Polym., 112, 342 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.006 ↗
40. 40 R. Varma and V. Sugumar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 56, 39 (2022), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.0310.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.03 ↗
41. 41 J. X. Sun, F. Xu, X. F. Sun, B. Xiao and R. C. Sun, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 88, 521 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.01310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.013 ↗
42. 42 D. S. Lakshmi, N. Trivedi and C. R. K. Reddy, Carbohyd. Polym., 157, 1604 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.04210.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.042 ↗
43. 43 C. S. R. Freire, A. J. D. Silvestre, C. P. Neto, M. N. Belgacem and A. Gandini, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 100, 1093 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2345410.1002/app.23454 ↗
44. 44 W. Hu, S. Chen, Q. Xu and H. Wang, Carbohyd. Polym., 83, 1575 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.01610.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.016 ↗
45. 45 B. Deepa, E. Abraham, N. Cordeiro, M. Mozetic, A. P. Mathew et al., Cellulose, 22, 1075 (2015), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma901005010.3390/ma9010050 ↗
46. 46 M. Roman and W. T. Winter, Biomacromolecules, 5, 1671 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034519+10.1021/bm034519 ↗
47. 47 N. Wang, E. Ding and R. Cheng, Polymer, 48, 3486 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.06210.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.062 ↗
48. 48 D. R. Mulinari, H. J. C. Voorwald, M. O. H. Cioffi, M. L. C. P. da Silva, T. G. da Cruz et al., Compos. Sci. Technol., 69, 214 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.006 ↗
49. "