Computational Screening of Current Collectors for Enabling Anode-Free Lithium Metal Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium metal cells are key for achieving high specific energy for electrification of transportation and aviation. Anode-free cells are lithium metal cells involving no excess lithium with the highest possible specific energy. In addition, anode-free cells are simpler, cheaper, and safer because they avoid the handling and manufacturing of lithium metal foils. The lack of excess lithium magnifies issues related to dendrite growth and poor cycling in anode-free cells. The electrolyte and current collector surface play a crucial role in affecting anode-free cell cycling performance. In this work, we have computationally screened for candidate current collectors that nucleate lithium effectively and allow uniform growth. These are determined by the free energy of lithium adsorption and lithium surface diffusion barrier on candidate current collectors. Using density functional theory calculations, we show that Li alloys possess ideal characteristics for Li nucleation and growth. These can lead to vastly improved performance compared to current transition-metal current collectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Extraction and Separation Processes · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
Funding
Vehicle Technologies Program · Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1310.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
2. U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium. USABC Goals for Advanced Batteries for EVs-CY 2020 Commercialization.
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0043210.1021/acsenergylett.7b00432 ↗
4. 10.1039/C3EE40795K10.1039/C3EE40795K ↗
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0219510.1021/acsenergylett.8b02195 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41893-019-0233-210.1038/s41893-019-0233-2 ↗
7. Hepperle, M. Electric Flight - Potential and Limitations. Workshop on Energy Efficient Technologies and Concepts Operation; German Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, Braunschweig, Germany; 2012.
8. 10.1038/srep0381510.1038/srep03815 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20150452610.1002/adma.201504526 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41560-018-0199-810.1038/s41560-018-0199-8 ↗
11. Zhang J.-G. · 201710.1007/978-3-319-44054-5 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.23110.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.231 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41565-018-0183-210.1038/s41565-018-0183-2 ↗
15. 10.1149/2.0091908jes10.1149/2.0091908jes ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20160235310.1002/adfm.201602353 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.139322610.1149/1.1393226 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.1571707jes10.1149/2.1571707jes ↗
19. 10.1038/s41560-017-0047-210.1038/s41560-017-0047-2 ↗
20. 10.1038/nnano.2016.3210.1038/nnano.2016.32 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0065010.1021/acsenergylett.6b00650 ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0401813jes10.1149/2.0401813jes ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0475510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04755 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0158110.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01581 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20180026610.1002/aenm.201800266 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.10.01210.1016/j.ensm.2017.10.012 ↗
27. 10.1039/C7NR09058G10.1039/C7NR09058G ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.00410.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.004 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20170209910.1002/anie.201702099 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20170034810.1002/adfm.201700348 ↗
31. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1010.1038/nenergy.2016.10 ↗
32. Zhu Y. · arXiv preprint · 2019
33. Chiang, Y.M.; Viswanathan, V.; Li, L.; Pande, V.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Ahmad, Z.; Woodford, W. H. Lithium metal electrodes and batteries thereof. U.S. Patent App. 15/480,235, 2017.
34. 10.1038/ncomms736210.1038/ncomms7362 ↗
35. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.1210.1038/nenergy.2017.12 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20160598910.1002/adfm.201605989 ↗
37. 10.1002/cssc.20190029810.1002/cssc.201900298 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.160668610.1149/1.1606686 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10008010021910.1007/s100080100219 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.477324210.1063/1.4773242 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.03510910.1103/PhysRevB.71.035109 ↗
42. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/25/25320210.1088/0953-8984/22/25/253202 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.23514910.1103/PhysRevB.85.235149 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0567710.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05677 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00363-X10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00363-X ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.281910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2819 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41929-018-0054-010.1038/s41929-018-0054-0 ↗
48. 10.1039/C8EE01448E10.1039/C8EE01448E ↗
49. Oura K. · 200310.1007/978-3-662-05179-5 ↗
50. Jonsson, H.; Mills, G.; Jacobsen, K. W. Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations; World Scientific Singapore, 1998; Chapter 16, pp 385–404.
51. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
52. 10.1039/tf937330044810.1039/tf9373300448 ↗
53. 10.1039/c1cp20547a10.1039/c1cp20547a ↗
54. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.02010.1016/j.joule.2017.08.020 ↗
55. 10.1038/nchem.213210.1038/nchem.2132 ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.150572811210.1073/pnas.1505728112 ↗