ELECTROSPINNING OF ANTIBACTERIAL CELLULOSE ACETATE NANOFIBERS

Textile Engineering Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey; IREM YAGMUR MOL; FUNDA CENGIZ ÇALLIOGLU; Textile Engineering Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey; HÜLYA KESICI GÜLER; Textile Engineering Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey; EMEL SESLI ÇETIN; Medical Microbiology Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey; GÖKSEL BILIR; Medical Microbiology Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

doi:10.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2023.57.08

journal article·2023-02-28Open access

ELECTROSPINNING OF ANTIBACTERIAL CELLULOSE ACETATE NANOFIBERS

Textile Engineering Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey, IREM YAGMUR MOL, FUNDA CENGIZ ÇALLIOGLU, Textile Engineering Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey, HÜLYA KESICI GÜLER, Textile Engineering Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey, EMEL SESLI ÇETIN, Medical Microbiology Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey, GÖKSEL BILIR, Medical Microbiology Department, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 57· Issue 1-2

Publisher page Open full text

Source abstract

Abstract

"Herein, it was aimed to achieve antibacterial cellulose acetate (CA) nanofiber production and characterization. Firstly, solution properties, such as viscosity, conductivity and surface tension, were determined. Secondly, CA/zinc oxide (ZnO) composite nanofibers were produced with optimum process parameters via the electrospinning method. Then, the electrospun nanofibers were characterized by SEM, EDX, DSC, TGA, XRD, air permeability and water vapor permeability testing. Lastly, antibacterial activity tests were carried out in accordance with the AATCC100 method, against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922). According to the results, solution conductivity decreased and surface tension did not change with ZnO concentration. On the other hand, viscosity decreased significantly with the first addition of ZnO and then increased slightly with increasing ZnO concentration. Generally, fine (354–464 nm), uniform and beadless nanofibers were obtained. Average fiber diameter, air permeability and water vapor permeability increased with ZnO concentration. EDX analysis results verified the existence of ZnO in the structure of CA nanofibers. As a result of antibacterial studies, it was determined that the CA/zinc oxide (ZnO) composite nanofibers with the highest concentration of ZnO showed very good antibacterial activity against both S. aureus and E. coli bacterial strains."

Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

Nanomaterials Composites

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references

1. "1 Y. Jia, G. Huang, F. Dong, Q. Liu and W. Nie, Polym. Compos., 37, 2847 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2348110.1002/pc.23481 ↗

2. 2 S. Wang, L. Sun, B. Zhang, C. Wang, Z. Li et al., Polym. Compos., 32, 347 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2103810.1002/pc.21038 ↗

3. 3 M. L. A. Anero, A. D. S. Montallana and M. R. Vasquez Jr., Results Phys., 25, 104223 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.10422310.1016/j.rinp.2021.104223 ↗

4. 4 A. D. S. Montallana, B.-Z. Lai, J. P. Chu and M. R. Vasquez Jr., Mater. Today Commun., 24, 101183 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10118310.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101183 ↗

5. 5 T. Czapka, A. Winkler, I. Maliszewska and R. Kacprzyk, Energies, 14, 2598 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/en1409259810.3390/en14092598 ↗

6. 6 M. T. Elsayed, A. A. Hassan, S. A. Abdelaal, M. M. Taher, M. Khalaf Ahmed et al., J. Mater. Res. Technol., 9, 13927 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.09410.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.094 ↗

7. 7 A. W. Jatoi, I. S. Kim and Q.-Q. Ni, Carbohyd. Polym., 207, 640 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.02910.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.029 ↗

8. 8 K. Kalwar and M. Shen, Nanotechnol. Rev., 8, 246 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2019-002310.1515/ntrev-2019-0023 ↗

9. 9 M. Q. Khan, D. Kharaghani, A. Shahzad, Y. Saito, T. Yamamoto et al., Polym. Test., 74, 39 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.01510.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.015 ↗

10. 10 K. Khoshnevisan, H. Maleki, H. Samadian, S. Shahsavari, M. H. Sarrafzadeh et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 198, 131 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.072 ↗

11. 11 R. K. Mishra, P. Mishra, K. Verma, A. Mondal, R. G. Chaudhary et al., Environ. Chem. Lett., 17, 767 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-00838-w10.1007/s10311-018-00838-w ↗

12. 12 V. Gomes, A. S. Pires, N. Mateus, V. de Freitas and L. Cruz, Food Hydrocolloid, 127, 107501 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.10750110.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107501 ↗

13. 13 R. E. Demirdogen, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 56, 559 (2022), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.4810.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.48 ↗

14. 14 L. Lei, W. Huang, K. Liu, X. Liu, M. Dai et al., J. Drug. Deliv. Sci. Tec., 69, 102863 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10286310.1016/j.jddst.2021.102863 ↗

15. 15 M. A. Wsoo, S. Shahir, S. P. M. Bohari, N. H. M. Nayan and S. I. Abd Razak, Carbohyd. Res., 491, 107978 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2020.10797810.1016/j.carres.2020.107978 ↗

16. 16 S. Majumder, M. A. Matin, A. Sharif and M. T. Arafat, J. Polym. Res., 27, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02356-210.1007/s10965-020-02356-2 ↗

17. 17 L. N. Nthunya, M. L. Masheane, S. P. Malinga, E. N. Nxumalo, T. G. Barnard et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 5, 153 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0108910.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01089 ↗

18. 18 A. Abramova, A. Gedanken, V. Popov, E.-H. Ooi, T. J. Mason et al., Mater. Lett., 96, 121 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.01.04110.1016/j.matlet.2013.01.041 ↗

19. 19 J. Zhu, Z. Ge and Z. Song, IFAC Journal of Systems and Control, 6, 1 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacsc.2018.09.00210.1016/j.ifacsc.2018.09.002 ↗

20. 20 F. C. Çallıoğlu, H. K. Güler and E. S. Çetin, Mater. Res. Express., 6, 125013 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab538710.1088/2053-1591/ab5387 ↗

21. 21 H. Jiang, L. Wang and K. Zhu, J. Control. Release, 193, 296 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.02510.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.025 ↗

22. 22 A. Wiesenthal, L. Hunter, S. Wang, J. Wickliffe and M. Wilkerson, Int. J. Dermatol., 50, 247 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04815.x10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04815.x ↗

23. 23 H. Agarwal, S. V. Kumar and S. Rajeshkumar, Resource-Efficient Techn., 3, 406 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2017.03.00210.1016/j.reffit.2017.03.002 ↗

24. 24 R. J. B. Butalid, A. P. S. Cristobal, A. D. S. Montallana and M. R. Vasquez Jr., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. B, 38, 062205 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1116/6.000030610.1116/6.0000306 ↗

25. 25 B. İkizler and S. M. Peker, Thin Solid Films, 605, 232 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2015.11.08310.1016/j.tsf.2015.11.083 ↗

26. 26 J. Jiang, J. Pi and J. Cai, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl., 2018, 1062562 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/106256210.1155/2018/1062562 ↗

27. 27 W. Wang, H. Huang, Z. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Wang et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 91, 3817 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02765.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02765.x ↗

28. 28 R. Ahmed, M. Tariq, I. Ali, R. Asghar, P. N. Khanam et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 120, 385 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.05710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.057 ↗

29. 29 R. Augustine, H. N. Malik, D. K. Singhal, A. Mukherjee, D. Malakar et al., J. Polym. Res., 21, 1 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-013-0347-610.1007/s10965-013-0347-6 ↗

30. 30 M. Imran, S. Haider, K. Ahmad, A. Mahmood and W. A. Al-Masry, Arab. J. Chem., 10, S1067 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.01.01310.1016/j.arabjc.2013.01.013 ↗

31. 31 A. Naveed Ul Haq, A. Nadhman, I. Ullah, G. Mustafa, M. Yasinzai et al., J. Nanomater., 2017, 1 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/851034210.1155/2017/8510342 ↗

32. 32 D. Zhang and D. Brodie, Thin Solid Films, 238, 95 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90655-610.1016/0040-6090(94)90655-6 ↗

33. 33 M. Kamalasanan and S. Chandra, Thin Solid Films, 288, 112 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(96)08864-510.1016/S0040-6090(96)08864-5 ↗

34. 34 M. Ohyama, H. Kouzuka and T. Yoko, Thin Solid Films, 306, 78 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00231-910.1016/S0040-6090(97)00231-9 ↗

35. 35 W. I. Park, D. H. Kim, S.-W. Jung and G.-C. Yi, Appl. Phys. Lett., 80, 4232 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.148280010.1063/1.1482800 ↗

36. 36 P. Gao and Z. L. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. B, 106, 12653 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026548510.1021/jp0265485 ↗

37. 37 L. Bahadur, M. Hamdani, J. Koenig and P. Chartier, Sol. Energ. Mater., 14, 107 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1633(86)90069-910.1016/0165-1633(86)90069-9 ↗

38. 38 D. Y. Lee, J.-E. Cho, N.-I. Cho, M.-H. Lee, S.-J. Lee et al., Thin Solid Films, 517, 1262 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2008.05.02710.1016/j.tsf.2008.05.027 ↗

39. 39 F. Cengiz and O. Jirsak, Fiber. Polym., 10, 177 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-009-0177-710.1007/s12221-009-0177-7 ↗

40. 40 N. Bhardwaj and S. C. Kundu, Biotechnol. Adv., 28, 325 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗

41. 41 H. Rodríguez-Tobías, G. Morales, A. Ledezma, J. Romero and D. Grande, J. Mater. Sci., 49, 8373 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8547-y10.1007/s10853-014-8547-y ↗

42. 42 W. A. Sarhan, H. M. Azzazy and I. M. El-Sherbiny, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 67, 276 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.00610.1016/j.msec.2016.05.006 ↗

43. 43 N. A. Elgheryani, Iraq. J. Phys., 17, 119 (2019), https://doi.org/10.30723/ijp.v17i40.41210.30723/ijp.v17i40.412 ↗

44. 44 G. Ma, D. Yang and J. Nie, Polym. Adv. Technol., 20, 147 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.118010.1002/pat.1180 ↗

45. 45 X. Zong, K. Kim, D. Fang, S. Ran, B. S. Hsiao et al., Polymer, 43, 4403 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00275-610.1016/S0032-3861(02)00275-6 ↗

46. 46 S. Ahmadian-Fard-Fini, D. Ghanbari, O. Amiri and M. Salavati-Niasari, Carbohyd. Polym., 229, 115428 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11542810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115428 ↗

47. 47 Y. Gutha, J. L. Pathak, W. Zhang, Y. Zhang and X. Jiao, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 103, 234 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.02010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.020 ↗

48. 48 P. Gibson, Text. Res. J., 63, 749 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175930630120810.1177/004051759306301208 ↗

49. 49 J. McCann and D. Bryson, "Textile-Led Design for the Active Ageing Population", Elsevier, 2014, pp. 551

50. 50 Z. Mao, J. Bai, X. Jin, W. Mao and Y. Dong, Colloid. Surface B, 208, 112070 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.11207010.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112070 ↗

51. "