REVIVING CELLULOSE-BASED INDUSTRIAL TEXTILE WASTES INTO RECYCLED PAPERS
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluates the feasibility of upcycling cellulose-based industrial textile wastes as reinforcement materials in recycled paper production. Waste cotton, flax, and hemp fibers were incorporated into recycled paper pulp at weight ratios of 25, 50, and 75 wt% to examine their effects on the physical and mechanical properties of handmade papers. Physical properties (basis weight, thickness, and water absorption) and mechanical performance (tensile index and tensile energy absorption index) were characterized. The results showed that textile fiber reinforcement significantly improved the mechanical performance of recycled papers. Cotton-reinforced papers exhibited increasing tensile strength and energy absorption with higher fiber content, whereas flax- and hemp-reinforced papers achieved maximum strength at lower fiber ratios. The highest tensile index (49.08 Nm/g) and tensile energy absorption index (3.11 J/g) were achieved with 75 wt% cotton fiber reinforcement. Water absorption behavior was strongly influenced by fiber type and crystallinity, showing an inverse relationship with mechanical performance. The findings demonstrated that cellulose-rich textile waste can serve as a sustainable reinforcement for recycled paper, supporting circular material use between the textile and paper industries and enabling applications in art, packaging, and value-added paper products.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 M. Siriner Onver, J. Curr. Debates in Soci. Sci., 2, 111 (2019)
2. 2 S. Gulec Solak and S. Pekkucuksen, MANAS J. Soc. Stud., 7, 653 (2018)
3. 3 K. Subramanian, M. K. Sarkar, H. Wang, Z. H. Qin, S. S. Chopra et al., Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 3921 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.196625410.1080/10643389.2021.1966254 ↗
4. 4 W. Leal Filho, M. A. P. Dinis, O. Liakh, A. Paço, K. Dennis et al., Text. Res. J., 94, 1798 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517524123697110.1177/00405175241236971 ↗
5. 5 Z. Dogan, Akdeniz Sanat, 4, 24 (2011)
6. 6 A. Shahzad, Compos. Mater., 46, 973 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831141362310.1177/0021998311413623 ↗
7. 7 Z. Jinqiu and Z. Jianchun, Text. Res. J., 80, 744 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750934231710.1177/0040517509342317 ↗
8. 8 K. P. Kaminski, J. Hoeng, F. Goffman, W. K. Schlage and D. Latino, Molecules, 29, 2397 (2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2910239710.3390/molecules29102397 ↗
9. 9 T. Sen and H. N. J. Reddy, Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol., 2, 192 (2011)
10. 10 N. Dhirhi, R. Shukla, N. Bharti Patel, H. Sahu and N. Mehta, Plant Archives, 15, 711 (2015)
11. 11 M. Muzyczek, in "The Textile Institute Book Series, Handbook of Natural Fibres", edited by R. M. Kozłowski and M. Mackiewicz-Talarczyk, 2020, Woodhead Publishing, pp.147-167
12. 12 W. Shuhua, Y. Xiaoying, C. Xiaogang, H. Wensheng and N. Mei, J. Nat. Fibers, 17, 520 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.150313010.1080/15440478.2018.1503130 ↗
13. 13 E. Gavcar, S. Şen and A. Aytekin, Turk. J. Agric. For., 23, 203 (1999)
14. 14 R. Toczyłowska-Mamińska, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 78, 764 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.02110.1016/j.rser.2017.05.021 ↗
15. 15 E. Saduman, Master's Thesis, Bartın University, 2014
16. 16 E. Małachowska, M. Dubowik, A. Lipkiewicz, K. Przybysz and P. Przybysz, Sustainability, 12, 7219 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/su1217721910.3390/su12177219 ↗
17. 17 J. Huang, Environ. Pollut., 6, 1 (2017), https://doi.org/10.5539/ep.v6n2p110.5539/ep.v6n2p1 ↗
18. 18 B. Koul, M. Yakoob and M. P. Shah, Environ. Res., 206, 112285 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.11228510.1016/j.envres.2021.112285 ↗
19. 19 M. Pydimalla, H. V. Chirravuri and A. N. Uttaravalli, Mater. Today, (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.27810.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.278 ↗
20. 20 P. Rousu, P. Rousu and J. Anttila, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 35, 85 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00124-010.1016/S0921-3449(01)00124-0 ↗
21. 21 K. M. Y. Arafat, J. Nayeem, A. H. Quadery, M. A. Quaiyyum and M. Sarwar Jahan, Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res., 53, 83 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v53i2.3666810.3329/bjsir.v53i2.36668 ↗
22. 22 A. Kumar, B. P. Singh, R. K. Jain and A. K. Sharma, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2, 5224 (2013)
23. 23 S. Samat, S. N. J. Abidin and K. Sellappan, Int. J. Tech. Voc. Eng. Technol., 4, 13 (2023)
24. 24 J. Pushpa and A. S. K. Sinha, IPPTA J., 23, 145 (2011)
25. 25 S. Kj, S. Mariyappanavar, V. V. Sangannavar, D. Jamadar, J. V. Vastrad et al., J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 9, 1410 (2020)
26. 26 B. Chen, S. Zhai, Y. Kan, X. Fan, X. Wang et al., Cellulose, 28, 9943 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04150-910.1007/s10570-021-04150-9 ↗
27. 27 G. M. Aryal, K. P. Kandel, R. K. Bhattarai, B. Giri, M. Adhikari et al., ACS Omega, 7, 32717 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0439810.1021/acsomega.2c04398 ↗
28. 28 L. R. O. Garcez, T. H. Gatti, J. C. Gonzalez, A. C. Franco and C. S. Ferreira, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 12805 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.207600510.1080/15440478.2022.2076005 ↗
29. 29 F. Prieto-García, E. Jiménez-Muñoz, O. A. Acevedo-Sandoval, R. Rodríguez‑Laguna, R. A. Canales‑Flores et al., Waste Biomass Valor., 10, 2379 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0262-510.1007/s12649-018-0262-5 ↗
30. 30 M. N. Islam, F. Rahman, S. A. Papri, M. O. Faruk, A. K. Das et al., J. Environ. Manag., 294, 113036 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11303610.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113036 ↗
31. 31 A. Khandelwal, S. Chauhan, S. Parihar, P. Dixit and S. R. Kumar, Curr. World Environ., 6, 77 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.6.1.1010.12944/CWE.6.1.10 ↗
32. 32 V. Kumar, S. Gupta, J. S. Kalra and P. P. Patil PP, Mater. Today: Proc., 46, 11274 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.48710.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.487 ↗
33. 33 A. Day, S. N. Chattopadhyay and I. N. Ghosh, IPPTA J., 18, 55 (2006)
34. 34 N. S. Amode and P. Jeetah, Waste Biomass. Valor., 12, 1781 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01125-y10.1007/s12649-020-01125-y ↗
35. 35 N. A. Shiddique, K. Islam, T. Islam, D. Hosen, A. Islam et al., Adv. Polym. Technol., 2024, 1 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/565231110.1155/2024/5652311 ↗
36. 36 A. Kumar, B. P. Singh, R. K. Jain and A. K. Sharma, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 2, 1338 (2014), https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV2IS100417
37. 37 A. Ilindra and J. D. Dhake, IPPTA J., 16, 51 (2004)
38. 38 R. Cheesman, PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, 1978
39. 39 P. D. Emrith, H. Ramasawmy, D. Surroop and D. B. Das, Waste Biomass. Valor., 15, 821 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02181-w10.1007/s12649-023-02181-w ↗
40. 40 F. Z. Amri and S. R. Masrol, PEAT, 3, 691 (2022), https://doi.org/10.30880/peat.2022.03.01.069
41. 41 H. W. Maurer, in "Starch", edited by J. BeMiller and R. Whistler, 2009, Academic Press, pp. 657-71310.1016/B978-0-12-746275-2.00018-5 ↗
42. 42 S. N. Monteiro, F. P. D. Lopes, A. P. Barbosa, A. B. Bevitori, I. L. A. D. Silva et al., Metall. Mater. Trans. A: Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., 42, 2963 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0789-610.1007/s11661-011-0789-6 ↗
43. 43 N. Sweygers, D. E. Depuydt, S. Eyley, W. Thielemans, Y. Mosleh et al., Ind. Crop. Prod., 186, 115187 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11518710.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115187 ↗
44. 44 D. Migneault, A. Koubaa and P. Perre, J. Wood Chem. Technol., 34, 241 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2013.86960410.1080/02773813.2013.869604 ↗
45. 45 S. Gordon and Y. L. Hsieh, "Cotton: Science and Technology", 2006, Woodhead Publishing10.1533/9781845692483 ↗
46. 46 M. S. Sreekala and S. Thomas, Compos. Sci. Technol., 63, 861 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00270-110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00270-1 ↗
47. 47 A. Mohammadzadeh, M. Barletta and A. Gisario, Appl. Phys. A, 126, 383 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03577-410.1007/s00339-020-03577-4 ↗
48. 48 C. G. Silva, D. Benaducci and E. Frollini, BioResources, 7, 78 (2011)10.15376/biores.7.1.78-98 ↗
49. 49 S. D. Petroudy, in "Advanced High Strength Natural Fibre Composites in Construction", edited by M. Fan and F. Fu, 2017, Woodhead Publishing, pp. 59-83
50. 50 C. C. Hernandez and D. Dos Santos Rosa, in "Polymer Science: Research Advances, Practical Applications And Educational Aspects", edited by A. Mendez-Vilaz and A. Solano, 2016, pp. 232-239
51. 51 C. M. Lee, K. Kafle, D. W. Belias, Y. B. Park, R. E. Glick et al., Cellulose, 22, 971 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0535-510.1007/s10570-014-0535-5 ↗
52. 52 C. Ververis, K. Georghiou, N. Christodoulakis, P. Santas and R. Santas, Ind. Crop. Prod., 19, 245 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.00610.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.006 ↗
53. 53 P. T. Larsson, T. Lindström, L. A. Carlsson and C. Fellers, J. Mater. Sci., 53, 3006 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1683-4"10.1007/s10853-017-1683-4 ↗