journal article·2025-07-25Open access

OPTIMIZATION OF RHAMNOGALACTURONAN EXTRACTION FROM LINSEED USING RSM AND DESIGNING A pH-RESPONSIVE TABLET FORMULATION FOR SUSTAINED RELEASE OF CIPROFLOXACIN ANTIBIOTICS

School of Chemistry, University of Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan, MUHAMMAD AJAZ HUSSAIN, NAJMA RAEES, Institute of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan, ARSHAD ALI, Institute of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan, MUHAMMAD TAYYAB, Department of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan, GULZAR MUHAMMAD, Department of Chemistry, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan, MALIHA UROOS, School of Chemistry, University of Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan, MADEEHA BATOOL, School of Chemistry, University of Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 59· Issue 5-6

Abstract

Herein, we reported the optimization of the isolation parameters to obtain the maximum yield of the linseed mucilage (LSM) through a statistical technique, i.e., response surface methodology by applying Box-Behnken Design (RSM-BBD). The aqueous isolation yield of LSM was optimized by studying the influence of temperature (T, °C), pH, seed-to-water contact time (t, h), and seed-to-water ratio (r, w/v). The maximum yield of LSM, i.e., 12.89%, was found at T of 71.9 °C, pH of 7.09, t of 6.24 h, and r of 1:24.50 w/v, according to RSM-BBD. The pH-responsive swelling of the LSM-based tablet formulation (M3), in buffers of pH 1.2, 6.8, and 7.4, and the swelling-deswelling (on-off switching) profile of M3 in the buffers of pH 7.4 and 1.2, respectively, were investigated. The results revealed that formulation M3 swelled at pH 6.8 and 7.4, but expressed minor swelling at pH 1.2. Moreover, formulation M3 showed swelling-deswelling behavior at pH 7.4 and 1.2, respectively. The LSM sustained the release of ciprofloxacin for 24 h and followed the first-order release kinetics as well as a non-Fickian diffusion mechanism. Concluding, the LSM can be considered as a pH-responsive sustained drug release material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Polysaccharides Composition and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 H. Mirhosseini and B. T. Amid, Food Res. Int., 46, 387 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.11.01710.1016/j.foodres.2011.11.017 ↗
2. 2 Z. H. Farooqi, A. Khan and M. Siddiq, Polym. Int., 60, 1481 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.310610.1002/pi.3106 ↗
3. 3 W. Wei, J. Li, X. Qi, Y. Zhong, G. Zuo et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 177, 275 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.13310.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.133 ↗
4. 4 A. Goyal, V. Sharma, N. Upadhyay, S. Gill and M. Sihag, J. Food Sci. Technol., 51, 1633 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1247-910.1007/s13197-013-1247-9 ↗
5. 5 P. Puligundla and S. Lim, Foods, 11, 1677 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/foods1112167710.3390/foods11121677 ↗
6. 6 K. Y. Qian, S. W. Cui, J. Nikiforuk and H. D. Goff, Carbohyd. Res., 362, 47 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2012.08.00510.1016/j.carres.2012.08.005 ↗
7. 7 K. Y. Qian, S. W. Cui, Y. Wu and H. D. Goff, Food Hydrocoll., 28, 275 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.12.01910.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.12.019 ↗
8. 8 M. T. Haseeb, M. A. Hussain, S. Bashir, M. U. Ashraf and N. Ahmad, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 43, 409 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2016.125701710.1080/03639045.2016.1257017 ↗
9. 9 M. T. Haseeb, S. Bashir, M. A. Hussain, M. U. Ashraf, A. Erum et al., Braz. J. Pharm. Sci., 54, e17459 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-9790201800021745910.1590/s2175-97902018000217459 ↗
10. 10 M. T. Haseeb, M. A. Hussain, S. H. Yuk, M. Amin, S. Bashir et al., Cellulose Chem. Technol., 52, 681 (2018), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT7-8(2018)/p.681-688.pdf
11. 11 P. Y. Hung and L. S. Lai, Food Hydrocoll., 93, 413 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.03710.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.037 ↗
12. 12 Y. Wu, S. W. Cui, J. Tang, and X. Gu, Food Chem., 105, 1599 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.03.06610.1016/j.foodchem.2007.03.066 ↗
13. 13 M. M. Dick, L. Dal, R. C. Rodrigues, R. A. de Oliveira and S. H. Flôres, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 123, 900 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.12610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.126 ↗
14. 14 R. H. Myers, D. C. Montgomery, G. G. Vining, C. M. Borror and S. M. Kowalski, J. Qual. Technol., 36, 53 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2004.1198025210.1080/00224065.2004.11980252 ↗
15. 15 A. Ali, M. T. Haseeb, M. A. Hussain, M. Tayyab, G. Muhammad et al., Cellulose Chem. Technol., 56, 957 (2022), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.8610.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.86 ↗
16. 16 S. N. A. Bukhari, A. Ali, M. A. Hussain, M. Tayyab, N. F. Alotaibi et al., Polymers, 14, 1904 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1409190410.3390/polym14091904 ↗
17. 17 M. Jouki, F. T. Yazdi, S. A. Mortazavi and A. Koocheki, Food Hydrocoll., 36, 9 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.08.03010.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.08.030 ↗
18. 18 M. A. Hussain, A. Ali, G. A. Tariq, A. Khan, A. M. T. Haseeb et al., Gels, 9, 525 (2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/gels907052510.3390/gels9070525 ↗
19. 19 M. E. Morales-Tovar, E. G. Ramos-Ramírez and J. A. Salazar-Montoya, Food Bioprod. Process., 120, 166 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2020.01.00910.1016/j.fbp.2020.01.009 ↗
20. 20 S. C. Orifici, M. I. Capitani, M. C. Tomás and S. M. Nolasco, J. Sci. Food Agric., 98, 4495 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.897410.1002/jsfa.8974 ↗
21. 21 S. Yousuf and S. S. Maktedar, Sustain. Food Technol., 1, 107 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1039/D2FB00010E10.1039/D2FB00010E ↗
22. 22 K. Zhang, W. Feng, and C. Jin, MethodsX, 7, 100779 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.10077910.1016/j.mex.2019.100779 ↗
23. 23 M. Gibaldi and S. Feldman, J. Pharm. Sci., 56, 1238 (1967), https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.260056100510.1002/jps.2600561005 ↗
24. 24 J. G. Wagner, J. Pharm. Sci., 58, 1253 (1969), https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.260058102110.1002/jps.2600581021 ↗
25. 25 R. W. Korsmeyer, R. Gurny, E. Doelker, P. Buri and N. A. Peppas, Int. J. Pharm., 15, 25 (1983), https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(83)90064-910.1016/0378-5173(83)90064-9 ↗
26. 26 P. L. Ritger and N. A. Peppas, J. Control Release, 5, 37 (1987), https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(87)90035-610.1016/0168-3659(87)90035-6 ↗
27. 27 J. Siepmann and N. A. Peppas, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 48, 139 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00112-010.1016/S0169-409X(01)00112-0 ↗
28. 28 E. Ghobadi, M. Varidi, M. J. Varidi and A. Koocheki, Innov. Food Technol., 5, 447 (2008), https://doi.org/10.22104/jift.2017.2173.1499
29. 29 I. Kouadri, A. Layachi, A. Makhlouf and H. Satha, Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact., 23, 362 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2018.145534310.1080/1023666X.2018.1455343 ↗
30. 30 S. N. A. Kumar, S. K. Ritesh, G. Sharmila and C. Muthukumaran, Arab. J. Chem., 10, S2145 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.04710.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.047 ↗
31. 31 S. Keshani-Dokht, Z. Emam-Djomeh, M. S. Yarmand and M. Fathi, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 118, 485 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.06910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.069 ↗
32. 32 M. Amin, N. S. Abbas, M. A. Hussain, M. Sher and K. J. Edgar, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 113, 719 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.14210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.142 ↗
33. 33 S. Hocine, D. Ghemati and D. Aliouche, Polym. Bull., 80, 12591 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04664-710.1007/s00289-022-04664-7 ↗
34. "