Geological Hydrogen Storage: Geochemical Reactivity of Hydrogen with Sandstone Reservoirs
Source abstract
Abstract
The geological storage of hydrogen is necessary to enable the successful transition to a hydrogen economy and achieve net-zero emissions targets. Comprehensive investigations must be undertaken for each storage site to ensure their long-term suitability and functionality. As such, the systematic infrastructure and potential risks of large-scale hydrogen storage must be established. Herein, we conducted over 250 batch reaction experiments with different types of reservoir sandstones under conditions representative of the subsurface, reflecting expected time scales for geological hydrogen storage, to investigate potential reactions involving hydrogen. Each hydrogen experiment was paired with a hydrogen-free control under otherwise identical conditions to ensure that any observed reactions were due to the presence of hydrogen. The results conclusively reveal that there is no risk of hydrogen loss or reservoir integrity degradation due to abiotic geochemical reactions in sandstone reservoirs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, West Main Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, U.K.
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · H2020 Energy
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. BP. Statistical Review of World Energy, 2020 | 69th Edition; https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2020-full-report.pdf (accessed 2022-05-26).
2. Dagdougui H. · 2018
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0084510.1021/acsenergylett.1c00845 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb03944.x10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb03944.x ↗
5. 10.1016/0016-2361(94)90019-110.1016/0016-2361(94)90019-1 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0001910.1021/acs.accounts.7b00019 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0065110.1021/acs.accounts.6b00651 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0438010.1021/acs.iecr.1c04380 ↗
9. 10.1039/D0EE03536J10.1039/D0EE03536J ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.13610.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.136 ↗
11. Foh S. · 197910.2172/6536941 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12665-015-4176-210.1007/s12665-015-4176-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11245110.1016/j.rser.2022.112451 ↗
14. 10.1016/0360-3199(79)90083-110.1016/0360-3199(79)90083-1 ↗
15. Panfilov M. · 2016 · 9110.1016/B978-1-78242-362-1.00004-3 ↗
16. 10.1029/2020GL09081410.1029/2020GL090814 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.11148110.1016/j.rser.2021.111481 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.10908110.1016/j.petrol.2021.109081 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0546710.1021/acs.est.7b05467 ↗
20. 10.3390/app811228210.3390/app8112282 ↗
21. Bourgeois J. P. · Rev. l’Institut Français du Pétrole · 1979 · 34 · 37110.2516/ogst:1979013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.02.02710.1016/j.gca.2010.02.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.02510.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.025 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.05.02110.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.05.021 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.11210.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.112 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12665-019-8184-510.1007/s12665-019-8184-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/0016-7037(84)90294-110.1016/0016-7037(84)90294-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.gca.2016.05.04010.1016/j.gca.2016.05.040 ↗
29. 10.1128/aem.51.1.39-43.198610.1128/aem.51.1.39-43.1986 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00603-016-1123-910.1007/s00603-016-1123-9 ↗
31. 10.1021/j100722a00610.1021/j100722a006 ↗
32. 10.1016/0921-5093(90)90348-710.1016/0921-5093(90)90348-7 ↗
33. 10.1021/ac60367a05210.1021/ac60367a052 ↗
34. 10.1016/0039-9140(94)80110-X10.1016/0039-9140(94)80110-X ↗
35. Caskey G R J. · 198310.2172/5906050 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja01215a06910.1021/ja01215a069 ↗