"BNNSs-OH/CAB COMPOSITE COATINGS AS A NOVEL FILM FOR HIGHLY EFFICIENT WATER VAPOR BARRIER PROPERTY "
Source abstract
Abstract
Cellulose-based composite packaging films are regarded as environmentally friendly materials due to their complete degradability, as compared with plastic materials. Herein, a high-barrier composite coated paper was fabricated by coating cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) with different concentrations of edge hydroxylated boron nitride (BNNSs-OH), and then the effects of water vapor barrier, along with composition ratio and film-forming thickness in gradient setting were evaluated. The composite membrane is more likely to create higher barrier performance as the concentration of BNNSs-OH increases. In view of mechanical properties and barrier properties, the best barrier effect is achieved when the hydroxylated boron nitride solution content is 12.5 wt% and the composite thickness is 100 μm, and the water vapor transmission rate is as low as 120.8 g/m2•day. Paper coated with BNNSs-OH/CAB may be used for packaging, showing promising potential not only for the food sector, but also for other application areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. "W. Katekhong, P. Wongphan, P. Klinmalai and N. Harnkarnsujarit, Food Chem., 374, 131709 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.13170910.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131709 ↗
2. 2 L. Yin and Q. Chen, Mater. Sci. Eng., 274, 012042 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/274/1/01204210.1088/1757-899X/274/1/012042 ↗
3. 3 K. Möller, T. Gevert and A. Holmström, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 73, 69 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00067-210.1016/S0141-3910(01)00067-2 ↗
4. 4 B. Nitya, S. V. Singh, R. S. Mor and K. Kshitiz, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 105, 385 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.09.01510.1016/j.tifs.2020.09.015 ↗
5. 5 D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H. P. Fink and A. Bohn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 22 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
6. 6 C. J. Malm, O. W. Kaul and G. D. Hiatt, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 43, 1094 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50497a02810.1021/ie50497a028 ↗
7. 7 H. Zhu, W. Luo, P. N. Ciesielski, Z. Fang, J. Y. Zhu et al., Chem. Rev., 116, 16 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0022510.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225 ↗
8. 8 N. R. Saha, I. Roy, G. Sarkar, A. Bhattacharyya, R. Das et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 187, 8 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.06510.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.065 ↗
9. 9 C. C. Pola, E. A. A. Medeiros, O. L. Pereira, V. G. L. Souza, C. G. Otoni et al., Food Packag. Shelf Life, 9, 69 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2016.07.00110.1016/j.fpsl.2016.07.001 ↗
10. 10 R. I. Quintero, M. J. Galotto, F. Rodriguez and A. Guarda, Packag. Technol. Sci., 27, 6 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.204310.1002/pts.2043 ↗
11. 11 H. Ferfera-Harrar and N. Dairi, Iran. Polym. J., 23, 12 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-014-0286-z10.1007/s13726-014-0286-z ↗
12. 12 H. A. El-Rehim, H. Kamal, E.-S. A. Hegazy, E.-S. Soliman and A. Sayed, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 153, 180 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.00710.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.007 ↗
13. 13 G. C. Pradhan, L. Behera and S. K. Swain, Chin. J. Polym. Sci., 32, 10 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-014-1511-010.1007/s10118-014-1511-0 ↗
14. 14 M. Azeem, R. Jan, S. Farrukh and A. Hussain, Results Phys., 12, 1535 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.01.05710.1016/j.rinp.2019.01.057 ↗
15. 15 K. Wu, J. Fang, J. Ma, R. Huang, S. Chai et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 35 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0821410.1021/acsami.7b08214 ↗
16. 16 D. Mondal, M. M. R. Mollick, B. Bhowmick, D. Maity, M. K. Bain et al., Prog. Nat. Sci., 23, 6 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2013.11.00910.1016/j.pnsc.2013.11.009 ↗
17. 17 D. Mondal, B. Bhowmick, M. M. Mollick, D. Maity, A. Mukhopadhyay et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 96, 1 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.06410.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.064 ↗
18. 18 K. Wu, P. Liao, R. Du, Q. Zhang, F. Chen et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 6, 25 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta03642j10.1039/C8TA03642J ↗
19. 19 U. Khan, A. O'Neill, M. Lotya, S. De and J. N. Coleman, Small, 6, 7 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20090206610.1002/smll.200902066 ↗
20. 20 K. K. Kim, A. Hsu, X. Jia, S. M. Kim, Y. Shi et al., Nano Lett., 12, 1 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1021/nl203249a10.1021/nl203249a ↗
21. 21 Q. Liu, C. Chen, M. Du, Y. Wu, C. Ren et al., ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 1, 9 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b0086710.1021/acsanm.8b00867 ↗
22. 22 C. Lei, K. Wu, L. Wu, W. Liu and R. Du, J. Mater. Chem. A, 7, 33 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA05067A10.1039/C9TA05067A ↗
23. 23 W. Brostow and D. Zhang, Mater. Lett., 276, 128179 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12817910.1016/j.matlet.2020.128179 ↗
24. 24 L. E. Nielsen, J. Macromol. Sci. A, 1, 5 (1967), https://doi.org/10.1080/1060132670805374510.1080/10601326708053745 ↗
25. 25 G. L. Graff, R. E. Williford and P. E. Burrows, J. Appl. Phys., 96, 4 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.176861010.1063/1.1768610 ↗
26. "