"ON THE IMPORTANCE OF VARIATION OF ALKALISATION CONDITIONS ON CELLULOSE ETHER SYNTHESIS"
Source abstract
Abstract
With a multivariate approach, we investigate and correlate the effect of mercerization conditions on the properties of a cellulose ether. We have chosen to work with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) for analytical reasons. As expected, the DS was found to increase when the NaOH/AGU (anhydroglucose unit) stoichiometric ratio (r) was increased (range 1.0–1.3) and [NaOH] was decreased (range 50-30%). However, such changes also favoured the formation of unwanted side products. Decreased (r) and increased [NaOH] resulted in increased heterogeneity, and thus the quantities of insoluble particles and unreacted chemicals also increased. As another result, the prediction between mercerisation and synthesis weakens. Consequently, a DS of 0.18–0.7 was obtained; the measured solubility was much lower than expected. A non-statistical distribution of substituents was further found. Interestingly, the relative importance of substitution at increases with an increased [NaOH].
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Lignin and Wood Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 J. Carraher and E. Charles, "Seymour/Carraher's Polymer Chemistry", sixth ed., CRC Press, 2003
2. 2 L. Berglund, K. A. Johansson and K. Sundberg, US Patents 7,504,498 B2 (2009)
3. 3 H. Saxell, I. Heiskanen, L. Axrup, C. L. Hensdal and V. Jokela, US Patents 2015/0094464 A1 (2015)
4. 4 E. Sjöström, "Wood Chemistry - Fundamentals and Applications", San Diego, Academic Press Inc., 1993
5. 5 F. Porro, O. Bedue, H. Chanzy and L. Heux, Biomacromolecules, 8, 2586 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1021/bm070265710.1021/bm0702657 ↗
6. 6 E. J. Lorand, Ind. Eng. Chem., 31, 891 (1939)10.1021/ie50355a022 ↗
7. 7 D. Klemm, B. Philipp, T. Heinze, U. Heinze and W. Wagenknecht, "Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry", Wiley-VCH, 2004
8. 8 D. C. Albán Reyes, N. Skoglund, A. Svedberg, B. Eliasson and O. Sundman, Cellulose, 23, 1061 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0879-010.1007/s10570-016-0879-0 ↗
9. 9 A. J. Barry, US Patents 2,296,829 (1942)10.1136/bmj.2.4261.296 ↗
10. 10 P. Boström and L. Karlson, US Patents 8,487,089 B2 (2013)
11. 11 P. Boström, I. Ingvarsson, and K. Sundberg, U.S. Patent No 5,140,099 (1992)
12. 12 P. Mansikkamäki, M. Lahtinen and K. Rissanen, Cellulose, 12, 233 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-004-3132-110.1007/s10570-004-3132-1 ↗
13. 13 P. Mansikkamäki, M. Lahtinen and K. Rissanen, Carbohyd. Polym., 68, 35 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.07.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2006.07.010 ↗
14. 14 V. Stigsson, G. Kloow and U. Germgård, Cellulose, 13, 705 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9083-y10.1007/s10570-006-9083-y ↗
15. 15 H. Zhao, F. Cheng, G. Li and J. Zhang, Int. J. Polym. Mater., 52, 749 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1080/71374371310.1080/713743713 ↗
16. 16 S. Dapia, V. Santos and J. C. Parajó, Bioresour. Technol., 89, 289 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00066-X10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00066-X ↗
17. 17 A. Hedlund and U. Germgård, Cellulose, 14, 161 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9096-610.1007/s10570-006-9096-6 ↗
18. 18 H. Almlöf, B. Kreutz, K. Jardeby and U. Germgård, Holzforschung, 66, 21 (2012)10.1515/HF.2011.131 ↗
19. 19 M. Yeasmin and M. Mondal, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 80, 725 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.040 0141-813010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.040 ↗
20. 20 T. Heinze and K. Pfeiffer, Angew. Makromol. Chem., 266, 37 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19990501)266:1<37::AID-APMC37>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19990501)266:1<37::AID-APMC37>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
21. 21 D. C. Albán Reyes, A. Gorzsas, K. Stridh, P. de Wit and O. Sundman, Carbohyd. Polym., 165, 213 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.04510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.045 ↗
22. 22 D. C. R. Forsberg, K. Stridh, P. P. de Wit and O. Sundman, Cellulose, 26, 1297 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2104-910.1007/s10570-018-2104-9 ↗
23. 23 J. Laine, T. Lindstrom, C. Bremberg and G. Glad-Nordmark, Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., 18, 316 (2003)10.3183/npprj-2003-18-03-p316-324 ↗
24. 24 L. Eriksson, T. Byrne, E. Johansson, J. Trygg and C. Vikström, "Multi- and Megavariate Data Analysis Basic Principles and Applications", Malmö, Umetrics Academy, 2013
25. 25 P. Geladi and B. R. Kowalski, Anal. Chim. Acta, 185, 1 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-910.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-9 ↗
26. 26 T. Heinze, U. Erler, I. Nehls and D. Klemm, Angew. Makromol. Chem., 215, 93 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1002/apmc.1994.05215010810.1002/apmc.1994.052150108 ↗
27. 27 R. Feller and M. Wilt, "Evaluation of Cellulose Ethers for Conservation", Getty Publications, 1991
28. 28 L. A. Ramos, E. Frollini and T. Heinze, Carbohyd. Polym., 60, 259 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.010 ↗
29. 29 K. Schenzel, H. Almlöf and U. Germgård, Cellulose, 16, 407 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9286-010.1007/s10570-009-9286-0 ↗
30. 30 H. Yokota, T. Sei, F. Horii and R. Kitamaru, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 41, 783 (1990)10.1002/app.1990.070410325 ↗
31. 31 T. Heinze and A. Koschella, Macromol. Symp., 223, 13 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20055050210.1002/masy.200550502 ↗
32. 32 F. Ho and D. Klosiewicz, Anal. Chem., 52, 913 (1980), https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50056a03210.1021/ac50056a032 ↗
33. 33 H. S. Qi, T. Liebert, F. Meister, L. N. Zhang and T. Heinze, in "Utilization of Lignocellulosic Materials", edited by T. Heinze, M. Janura and A. Koschella, Wiley-VCH Verlag Gmbh, 2010, pp. 125-132
34. 34 Y. Tezuka, Y. Tsuchiya and T. Shiomi, Carbohyd. Res., 291, 99 (1996)10.1016/S0008-6215(96)00163-2 ↗
35. 35 E. A. Kragten, J. P. Kamerling and J. F. G. Vliegenthart, J. Chromatogr. A, 623, 49 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(92)85297-710.1016/0021-9673(92)85297-7 ↗
36. 36 H. Kono, K. Oshima, H. Hashimoto, Y. Shimizu and K. Tajima, Carbohyd. Polym., 146, 1 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.00310.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.003 ↗
37. 37 D. L. Kaplan, in "Biopolymers from renewable Resources", edited by D. L. Kaplan, Springer, 1998, pp. 47-9010.1007/978-3-662-03680-8 ↗
38. 38 K. Jardeby, H. Lennholm and U. Germgård, Cellulose, 11, 195 (2004)10.1023/B:CELL.0000025390.81603.40 ↗
39. 39 K. Jardeby, U. Germgård, B. Kreutz, T. Heinze, U. Heinze et al., Cellulose, 12, 167 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-004-1371-910.1007/s10570-004-1371-9 ↗
40. 40 V. Myllymaki and R. Aksela, US Patent 2007/0112185 A1 (2007)
41. 41 H. M. Spurlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 61, 2222 (1939), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01877a07010.1021/ja01877a070 ↗
42. "