journal article·2023-07-20Open access

EFFECT OF TiO2 DECORATED CELLULOSIC MATERIALS ADDITION ON MECHANICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF DENTAL ADHESIVE COMPOSITES

Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan, HUMAIRA JABEEN, NAWSHAD MUHAMMAD, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan, USAMA SIDDIQUI, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan, MUHAMMAD SABIR, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Biomedical Materials, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Pakistan, NAVEED AHMAD, Department of Chemical and Material Engineering, College of Engineering, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia, SAAD LIAQAT, Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 57· Issue 5-6

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to prepare cellulose fibers decorated with titanium dioxide, and then incorporate them into the formulation of dental adhesive composites. The influence of this filler on the mechanical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the composites was examined. Different proportions of the filler were mixed with the monomers and then the prepared materials were analyzed through chemical, mechanical, and microscopic characterization. Biocompatibility tests were performed using fibroblast cell lines. Mechanical characterization included the hardness test, the biaxial flexural strength (BFS) test, and the shear bond strength test (SBT). The fillers were found biocompatible, as suggested by the Alamar blue assay, while the mechanical properties of the composites increased with higher filler content. The experimental composite presented good mechanical and biological properties, and thus, it can be used as a dental adhesive material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 1 J. Perdigão, E. Araujo, R. Q. Ramos, G. Gomes and L. Pizzolotto, J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 33, 51 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.1269210.1111/jerd.12692 ↗
2. 2 A. Caiafa and L. Visser, in "Wiggs's Veterinary Dentistry: Principles and Practice", edited by H. B. Lobprise and J. R. B. Dodd, Wiley, 2019, pp. 357-38610.1002/9781118816219.ch17 ↗
3. 3 F. Amin, M. A. Fareed, M. S. Zafar, Z. Khurshid, P. J. Palma et al., Coatings, 12, 1094 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1208109410.3390/coatings12081094 ↗
4. 4 E. Sofan, A. Sofan, G. Palaia, G. Tenore, U. Romeo et al., Ann. Stomatol. (Roma), 8, 1 (2017), https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.00110.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001 ↗
5. 5 I. Q. S. de Moraes, T. G. do Nascimento, A. T. da Silva, L. M. S. S. de Lira, A. Parolia et al., Restor. Dent. Endod., 45, 31 (2020), https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e3110.5395/rde.2020.45.e31 ↗
6. 6 Y. F. Alfaawaz, R. Alamri, F. Almohsen, S. Shabab, M. M. Alhamdan et al., Scanning, 2022, 0161 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/347788610.1155/2022/3477886 ↗
7. 7 H. Moradpoor, M. Safaei, H. R. Mozaffari, R. Sharifi, M. M. Imani et al., RSC Adv., 11, 21189 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA10789A10.1039/D0RA10789A ↗
8. 8 G. Fittolani, T. Tyrikos-Ergas, D. Vargová, M. A. Chaube and M. Delbianco, J. Org. Chem., 17, 1981 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.17.12910.3762/bjoc.17.129 ↗
9. 9 J. Moohan, S. A. Stewart, E. Espinosa, A. Rosal, A. Rodríguez et al., Appl. Sci., 10, 65 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3390/app1001006510.3390/app10010065 ↗
10. 10 T. C. Mokhena and M. J. John, Cellululose, 27, 1149 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02889-w10.1007/s10570-019-02889-w ↗
11. 11 M. Alhaji Mohammed, W. J. Basirun, N. M. M. Abd Rahman and N. Salleh, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 5577 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.188168910.1080/15440478.2021.1881689 ↗
12. 12 H. G. de Oliveira Barud, R. R. da Silva, M. A. C. Borges, G. R. Castro, S. J. L. Ribeiro et al., Molecules, 26, 49 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2601004910.3390/molecules26010049 ↗
13. 13 A. Sengottuvelan, Bioactivation of titanium dioxide scaffolds by functionalization and coating approaches, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 2021
14. 14 V. Kumaravel, K. M. Nair, S. Mathew, J. Bartlett, J. E. Kennedy et al., J. Chem. Eng., 416, 129071 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.12907110.1016/j.cej.2021.129071 ↗
15. 15 L. Chen, Z. Jiao, X. Yin, W. Li, X. Wang et al., J. Environ. Manag., 319, 115718 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11571810.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115718 ↗
16. 16 M. A. Ruivo, R. R. Pacheco, M. Sebold and M. Giannini, Microsc. Res. Tech., 82, 1756 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.2334210.1002/jemt.23342 ↗
17. 17 N. L. Kelly, PhD Thesis, University of Warwick, 2020, https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/156863/
18. 18 M. Goulart, A. Fugolin, S. Lewis, J. Rodrigues, M. Erhardt et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 118, 111535 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11153510.1016/j.msec.2020.111535 ↗
19. 19 S. U. Zaman, M. K. U. Zaman, S. Rafiq, A. Arshad, M. S. Khurram et al., Artif. Organs, 45, 1377 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.1402010.1111/aor.14020 ↗
20. 20 S. Chung, A. Yap, S. Chandra and C. Lim, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater., 71, 278 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3010310.1002/jbm.b.30103 ↗
21. 21 N. Kumar, F. Ghani, M. A. Fareed, S. Riaz, Z. Khurshid et al., Mater. Technol., 37, 2166 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2021.188666410.1080/10667857.2021.1886664 ↗
22. 22 M. Hu, R. Weiger and J. Fischer, Dent. Mater., 32, 223 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.02310.1016/j.dental.2015.11.023 ↗
23. 23 B. Pidhatika, V. T. Widyaya, P. C. Nalam, Y. A. Swasono and R. Ardhani, Polymers, 14, 5526 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1424552610.3390/polym14245526 ↗
24. 24 S. A. Shahdad, J. F. McCabe, S. Bull, S. Rusby and R. W. Wassell, Dent. Mater., 23, 1079 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.00110.1016/j.dental.2006.10.001 ↗
25. 25 B. Pratap, R. K. Gupta, L. Denis and D. Goswami, Mater. Today Proceed., 21, 1563 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.09010.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.090 ↗
26. 26 S. H. Kim, C. M. Lee and K. Kafle, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30, 2127 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0162-010.1007/s11814-013-0162-0 ↗
27. 27 K. L. Khalid, J. Pure Appl. Sci., 13, 53 (2022), https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v13i1.10S
28. 28 H. Zhao, J. H. Kwak, Z. C. Zhang, H. M. Brown, B. W. Arey et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 68, 235 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.12.01310.1016/j.carbpol.2006.12.013 ↗
29. 29 K. Conley, L. Godbout, M. T. Whitehead and T. G. van de Ven, Carbohyd. Polym., 135, 285 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.02910.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.029 ↗
30. 30 R. P. Swatloski, S. K. Spear, J. D. Holbrey and R. D. Rogers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 4974 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja025790m10.1021/ja025790m ↗
31. 31 X. Ju, M. Bowden, E. E. Brown and X. Zhang, Carbohyd. Polym., 123, 476 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.07110.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.071 ↗
32. 32 S. S. Al-Taweel and H. R. Saud, J. Chem. Pharm., 8, 620 (2016), www.jocpr.com
33. 33 L. C. Yeng, M. U. Wahit and N. Othman, J. Teknol., 75, 107 (2015), https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.533810.11113/jt.v75.5338 ↗
34. 34 Z. Kutuk, C. Ozturk, F. Cakir and S. Gurgan, Niger. J. Clin. Pract., 22, 833 (2019), https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_628_1810.4103/njcp.njcp_628_18 ↗
35. 35 A. Skapska, Z. Komorek, M. Cierech and E. Mierzwinska-Nastalska, Polymers, 14, 2686 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1413268610.3390/polym14132686 ↗
36. 36 K. Cho, G. Rajan, P. Farrar, L. Prentice and B. G. Prusty, Compos. B. Eng., 230, 109495 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10949510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109495 ↗
37. 37 J. Perdigão, Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev., 56, 190 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.00410.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004 ↗
38. 38 N. Ilie, T. Hilton, S. Heintze, R. Hickel, D. Watts et al., Dent. Mater., 33, 880 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.01310.1016/j.dental.2017.04.013 ↗
39. 39 Y. Kadin, M. Mazaheri, V. Zolotarevskiy, C. Vieillard and M. Hadfield, J. Eur. Ceram., 39, 4011 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.05.05810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.05.058 ↗
40. 40 T. A. Cevanti, N. S. Purnama Sari, S. I. Isnaini, M. F. Rois, H. Setyawan et al., J. Int. Dent. Med. Res., 14, 1401 (2021), http://www.jidmr.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/13-D21_1651_Dian_Agustin_Indonesia-3-Adioro.-Cellulose.pdf
41. 41 M. Sabir, A. Ali, U. Siddiqui, N. Muhammad, A. S. Khan et al., J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 31, 1806 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.177782710.1080/09205063.2020.1777827 ↗
42. 42 M. Sabir, N. Muhammad, U. Siddiqui, A. S. Khan, M. R. Syed et al., Polym. Bull., 1 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04503-910.1007/s00289-022-04503-9 ↗